Non-Key Tweets | Page 937 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

pepband99

Resident TV nerd
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,761
Reaction Score
9,694
Are you really arguing that real estate on a cable dial matters? This is one of the most boomer arguments I have seen in weeks.

It does when linear access rates differ, at a minimum.

That being said, look at ESPN vs FS1 ratings for comparable content, and you will have your answer.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,661
Reaction Score
8,664
I guess and yet they're willing to pay Connecticut to put our games on there. They must've found some cash in the sock drawer or something.
To be fair, they are literally only paying us cash in the sock drawer amounts. And then managed to find a play by play announcer who had literally never called a college football game (and probably never even been to one) before she started doing ours.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,340
Reaction Score
21,778
Are you really arguing that real estate on a cable dial matters? This is one of the most boomer arguments I have seen in weeks.
That is the only reason the ACC is looking at Stanford/Cal/SMU. They are additive to the linear ACC Network. I think it is short sighted, but that’s the driver.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2021
Messages
955
Reaction Score
3,744

I can’t see the higher ups at uconn doing anything this stupid..i can see them doing a money grab for all sports and a full share at the expense of our basketball
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,334
Reaction Score
221,395
To be fair, they are literally only paying us cash in the sock drawer amounts. And then managed to find a play by play announcer who had literally never called a college football game (and probably never even been to one) before she started doing ours.
Lol, I want to be critical of your last sentence, but, man, she was abysmal wasn't she? :D

That said there's a long line of teams that would love our deal, including those whose entire conference gets for all their sports. I'll tell you, it never fails to amaze me how hard New Englanders work out to find the downside about things. It's definitely not Notre Dame's NBC deal, but it's still a deal, it's still more money, it's still more exposure and all of that is a good thing.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,661
Reaction Score
8,664
Lol, I want to be critical of your last sentence, but, man, she was abysmal wasn't she? :D

That said there's a long line of teams that would love our deal, including those whose entire conference gets for all their sports. I'll tell you, it never fails to amaze me how hard New Englanders work out to find the downside about things. It's definitely not Notre Dame's and BC deal, but it's still a deal, it's still more money, it's still more exposure and all of that is a good thing.
There is a long line of teams. But none of them are programs we are emulating or striving to be. Yes, Georgia State and Toledo and San Jose State would all take our home football exposure and money. And?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,661
Reaction Score
8,664
Lol, I want to be critical of your last sentence, but, man, she was abysmal wasn't she? :D
I don't even want to be critical of her -- I have heard her call a basketball game and she is competent. I am amazed that CBS would put someone who had never called a game anywhere else on the air without adequate testing and training just because they had hired her to do some basketball.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,661
Reaction Score
8,664
That is the only reason the ACC is looking at Stanford/Cal/SMU. They are additive to the linear ACC Network. I think it is short sighted, but that’s the driver.
Apparently, for reasons I don't understand, they are not willing to change their strategy 180 degrees just because Muntz thinks they're stupid. Go figure.
 
Last edited:

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,562
Reaction Score
34,319
Whether you call it boomer or not, the reality is that cable still outperforms streaming and it likely will until a tipping point in another 3-5 years. People with the means will continue to want cable and a conventional large screen for the ease of it and channel surfing. Media strategies have to embrace both until technology advances make streaming more user-friendly.

I am saying that where you are on the cable dial has become completely irrelevant. Most people don't know and don't care what channel they are watching when they watch a game. The days of surfing through channels and stopping on ESPN are over.

Just out of a desire for survival, at some point cable is going to morph into something that looks a lot like streaming. The key point is that ESPN's monopoly on access will be broken. That is all we really need, because then it becomes a free-for-all for viewers, and I like UConn's odds in that scenario.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
21,046
Reaction Score
47,640
I can’t see the higher ups at uconn doing anything this stupid..i can see them doing a money grab for all sports and a full share at the expense of our basketball
I would love it. Just so i could see the heads of people like you explode.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,334
Reaction Score
221,395
There is a long line of teams. But none of them are programs we are emulating or striving to be. Yes, Georgia State and Toledo and San Jose State would all take our home football exposure and money. And?
Duh, why would we emulate anyone who is striving to achieve what we already have? I bet that sounded a lot more insightful in your head.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,334
Reaction Score
221,395
I don't even want to be critical of her -- I have heard her call a basketball game and she is competent. I am amazed that CBS would put someone who had never called a game anywhere else on the air without adequate testing and training just because they had hired her to do some basketball.
I'm sure they have their reasons, whether it was a desire to have their announcing staff look more inclusive, or maybe just take a talented commentator and expand her range, but I agree with you she was terrible and didn't seem thoroughly unprepared.
 

Dream Jobbed 2.0

“Most definitely”
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
15,003
Reaction Score
56,612
Non-key legit tweets
And what he outlines certainly fits the narratives we have seen. Zaga/UConn has probably been the B12 preferred goal the entire time as BB only. We are the ones slowing it down- holding out for the full ticket.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,394
Reaction Score
22,856
I can’t see the higher ups at uconn doing anything this stupid..i can see them doing a money grab for all sports and a full share at the expense of our basketball

I have a different opinion. I say take it as long as a football alliance is included. We can be the ND of the B12. It must run through the same timeline as the current B12 media contract. Then we will “invest” in football like there is no tomorrow. Cheat, steal, whatever it takes. It gives us 5-6 years to get this the ship turned around.
 

Chin Diesel

Power of Love
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,418
Reaction Score
104,569
SO true...... it's like they enjoy the carnage, SMH !


This does go to the point that all the major conferences have a few teams who the media partners know bring zero value by themselves but rather just serve as fodder and programming hours for the teams who do bring value.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2016
Messages
594
Reaction Score
1,444
Honest question though: if the endgame is to be fully part of a conference, and they agreed join a big conf in bball only and FB scheduling preference, that conf has no financial incentive to add them as a full partner in the future even if FB gets better. Why would they? The conf is getting a better product for nothing. I get the risk of getting completely left without a conf. though. Not sure what is realistic anymore.
how about if there is an end game - full membership after a set period of time
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
90
Reaction Score
251
how about if there is an end game - full membership after a set period of time
Would be nice, but what incentive does the conf have to agree to that? In theory they could add them later if UConn FB improved. This arrangement is one sided, and imo you only consider doing something like this if you are out of options (they might be), and there is no hope of a better situation in the future.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2016
Messages
594
Reaction Score
1,444
Would be nice, but what incentive does the conf have to agree to that? In theory they could add them later if UConn FB improved. This arrangement is one sided, and imo you only consider doing something like this if you are out of options (they might be), and there is no hope of a better situation in the future.
thats the point. it cant be one sided
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,543
Reaction Score
88,208
NBC gave up on their sports cable channel. They didn't even bother to have a goodbye sendoff. It just died after an auto auction one night.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,814
Reaction Score
9,569
Once you one button types die Cable is dunzo.
Sorry, but I stream more than I watch via cable... If you're running a media company now and gun is to your head, where do you put your less than 3 year business strategy?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
27,493
Reaction Score
37,210
Sorry, but I stream more than I watch via cable... If you're running a media company now and gun is to your head, where do you put your less than 3 year business strategy?

Networks that are affiliated with YouTube TV and Fubo. Stuff like that.
 

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
1,912
Total visitors
2,040

Forum statistics

Threads
159,560
Messages
4,195,707
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom