- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
- Messages
- 2,351
- Reaction Score
- 5,746
The new Husky is in time for us leaving the so-called Big East and heading to the B12!
And it’s sponsored by Rockstar energy drinks.It houses The Bahamian Studies Program.
Meh, NAU at #20???
I’m guessing the metrics aren’t weighted by sport. So winning a NC in quidditch is equal to the NC in football.
NAU are perennial NCAA champions in cross country.Who knows his metrics....not Director's Cup metrics for sure.
Apple is going to put out that huge amount of money for a very short 3 year deal? No freaking way.If true, would this help or hurt us? For the B12 to expand and extend an offer to UConn, we would need a partner.
Yeah, but the same tweet also states that the term if the deal will be three years. I'm not sure when the current media deal expires but I imagine they aren't negotiating today for something that won't start until the fall of 2026. If Apple's plan is to purchase ESPN in three years, why wouldn't they want the PAC's content for a longer term in the deal they are currently negotiating?That tweet is based on the assumption that Apple buys ESPN in three years. Seems to be saying that it doesn't matter that the deal is streaming because one of the biggest linear players won't be around anyway.
I mostly follow and read Andrew Marchand from the NY Post as it relates to media deals. He’s got a pretty reliable track recordContradicting almost everything I've read about the PAC12 deal, all others have it less than $25M/yr. I saw one this morning of $19.5/yr. Who knows.
Oh, I agree. And why would the PAC be believing that Apple is going to purchase ESPN in three years? I doubt that Apple is telling them that.Yeah, but the same tweet also states that the term if the deal will be three years. I'm not sure when the current media deal expires but I imagine they aren't negotiating today for something that won't start until the fall of 2026. If Apple's plan is to purchase ESPN in three years, why wouldn't they want the PAC's content for a longer term in the deal they are currently negotiating?
There's some decent stuff on there, but it wasn't enough to keep me interested in it. I may turn it back on and binge the second season Ted Lasso and see what else is available.Apple could pay in order to keep the PAC together. Just looked into Apple TV to watch Ted Lasso and it did not seem like they had a lot of content. Noticed MLS.
Just because you have money doesn't mean you have to spend it (I cannot tell you how many times I said this exact thing to my ex-wife).Apple could pay in order to keep the PAC together. Just looked into Apple TV to watch Ted Lasso and it did not seem like they had a lot of content. Noticed MLS.
Unless Apple announced that their intentions publicly , it would potentially be illegal if anyone privy to the conversation then used it to buy Disney stock. Yet the information finds its way to Big 12 Mafia.Oh, I agree. And why would the PAC be believing that Apple is going to purchase ESPN in three years? I doubt that Apple is telling them that.