Non-Key Tweets | Page 1046 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

temery

What?
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
21,352
Reaction Score
43,777
Maybe just go with the "I Hate You All Non-Key Tweet Forum"? That seems easier.

you just jumped to the Multiverse. Maybe someone there will have some idea of what you're talking about.
 

Fairfield_1st

Sitting on this Barstool talking like a damn fool
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
2,688
Reaction Score
8,552
Plus, Swaim was a freaking lunatic.
So are you for or against the renaming? To me it seems like a "freaking lunatic" perfectly sums up the non-key tweets. :)
Do we have to remove tweets from the name since it's now X? Such a dumb name change. EM should have left it alone. It's like when Prince became the symbol. In both case, Twitter & Prince, people just called it the site/artist formerly known as...
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
21,314
Reaction Score
46,899
So are you for or against the renaming? To me it seems like a "freaking lunatic" perfectly sums up the non-key tweets. :)
Do we have to remove tweets from the name since it's now X? Such a dumb name change. EM should have left it alone. It's like when Prince became the symbol. In both case, Twitter & Prince, people just called it the site/artist formerly known as...
Prince adopted the symbol to get out of a bad record contract. So not the same thing.
 

Fairfield_1st

Sitting on this Barstool talking like a damn fool
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
2,688
Reaction Score
8,552
Prince adopted the symbol to get out of a bad record contract. So not the same thing.
Did someone pee in your cornflakes today?
I didn't mention how or why they got their new names, just that people continued to reference their original name and not the new one.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
17,952
Reaction Score
24,762
This is getting weirder by the day - an employee paying other "employees".
I may be missing a post. nevertheless, it is possible for one to be both an employee and a contractor. not sure if that applies to your comment.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,880
Reaction Score
9,755
I may be missing a post. nevertheless, it is possible for one to be both an employee and a contractor. not sure if that applies to your comment.
I see the coach as an employee and the athletes as quasi employees or true employees in the future (that's why I put the reference to players being employees in quotes)... Regardless, this LSU scenario sure is raising a lot of eyebrows, questions and concerns.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,842
Reaction Score
48,728
I see the coach as an employee and the athletes as quasi employees or true employees in the future (that's why I put the reference to players being employees in quotes)... Regardless, this LSU scenario sure is raising a lot of eyebrows, questions and concerns.
They can't be considered employees when there's so much more involved here. They're part of a university that has so many different categories of workers.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,880
Reaction Score
9,755
They can't be considered employees when there's so much more involved here. They're part of a university that has so many different categories of workers.
Whether considered employees technically or not, they will likely be something extremely close to it in the fairly near future. Perhaps some sort of union-like situation with collective bargaining. It's moving that way with these decided and looming court cases.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,842
Reaction Score
48,728
Whether considered employees technically or not, they will likely be something extremely close to it in the fairly near future. Perhaps some sort of union-like situation with collective bargaining. It's moving that way with these decided and looming court cases.
I was actually referring to the courts. There are a lot of carve outs at universities in labor law and even with taxes.

If college ball were truly run as a business the profit split would be totally different.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
17,952
Reaction Score
24,762
I see the coach as an employee and the athletes as quasi employees or true employees in the future (that's why I put the reference to players being employees in quotes)... Regardless, this LSU scenario sure is raising a lot of eyebrows, questions and concerns.
Got it. That's really no different than any organization, especially pro sports where the athletes make more than the coaches. Everyone is an employee and the coach is in management.
They can't be considered employees when there's so much more involved here. They're part of a university that has so many different categories of workers.
There are far more complicated arrangements in the corporate world. Agreed there is a lot to shake out here, but whether they end up being employees, contractors, full time, part time, they'll figure out a way to get paid.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,842
Reaction Score
48,728
Got it. That's really no different than any organization, especially pro sports where the athletes make more than the coaches. Everyone is an employee and the coach is in management.

There are far more complicated arrangements in the corporate world. Agreed there is a lot to shake out here, but whether they end up being employees, contractors, full time, part time, they'll figure out a way to get paid.
It's the below minimum wage thing that is allowed on campus. Not sure about the corporate world for that. But many workers are also exempt from taxes.
 

UCFBfan

Kings of New England!
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
6,145
Reaction Score
13,670
Who is Uncle UConn? That's a new one. Is his nephew the Dude? Does he own a car wash? Does he know how to use the "/" key a lot?????
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
392
Guests online
2,787
Total visitors
3,179

Forum statistics

Threads
161,263
Messages
4,256,697
Members
10,097
Latest member
21isawesome


.
Top Bottom