I disagree about this. Though he might not have ever been a jumper he has lost lateral quickness since his Freshman year with the added weight. He use to have some pretty fast post moves even though he missed them a lot. LOL. He now is just plain slow and it is painful. As soon as he moves the defense is there. He sucks but he is all we have back there to give AB some minutes so he has to learn to do the dirty work of rebounding better at least.
Agreed on pretty much all of this.We usually have this thread about once per year.
My experience with weight lifting was pretty typical, I thought, of most men in their late teens and 20s. If you're not taking drugs, and you're busting your ass in the weight room for at least an hour a day, 5 days a week, a pound a month of muscle would be an excellent gain. That's 12 pounds a year.
Their is a very widely spread myth that a man can add "15 pounds of muscle in the off season." That's complete horsesh-t, unless you're on steroids. At that rate, you could put on 30 pounds of muscle a year and go from a 160 pound weakling to Arnold sized in 3 years. That's not how it works.
Phil did not - repeat, did not - put on 20 pounds of muscle between April and September. 10 pounds of muscle over that time period would have been a tremendous gain. If he put on 20 pounds, it was mostly fat.
Regarding training for vertical - pretty darn easy, really. Olympic squat athletes all have tremendous vertical.
When I started playing ball, I had about a 24" vertical. Pathetic. After about 4 years of heavy weight training and playing ball, my vertical was about 36". Acceptable. But my squat went from sets at 110 to sets at 300 over those 4 years.
I'm also not a believer that muscles make you slower or bulker or any of that, unless you're Mr. Olympia size. Most 18 year olds with a natural frame, like Phil, would benefit immensely from putting on 25 pounds of muscle, for quickness, vertical, and all of it.
The Florida before and after pics are proof of that - they didn't get slower by getting more muscular.
Phil is Phil.
I don't disagree about being a bad finisher. I agree he has always been but now he can't even get open on his moves as they are so slow. He definitely didn't gain much muscle as he seems weaker with the extra weight also. LOL!!!!Well, then I guess we'll agree to disagree. Phil has always been a terrible finisher around the basket because he's never been particularly quick or explosive. If you think it's the weight, then that's your prerogative.
You think! He's been here 3 years and we would think he's trending up but he's stagnant. Expected some slight improvement ; how hard can that be. Put the Rock in a let him bang some bodies around at least we have him for 4 years.
Yeah i know but sometimes the truth has to be said and sometimes its harsh. I dont like to sugar coat like a lot of apologists on here. I praised his play in the tourney last season which was a revelation and helped contribute to our title. But the fact is he has been absolutely terrible this year thus far and hasnt been very good since hes been here. I really hope he gets it together but i see absolutely no reason to believe he will. I mean come on, Brimah,Facey and even Lubin played well against that horrible coppin st frontcourt but Noland did Zilch !!!wow. pretty harsh.
He made a really nice move against Texas, where he spun around and had a clean dunk from about 10', but he, incredibly, missed a dunk. Two points for an uncontested layup... hopefully next time. Oh, and we lost by 1.I love Phil and hate to criticize the guy but really WTF has he really worked on in the off-season . He finished last season strong for Phil and was an important player in the rotation during the championship run. I really thought Phil was gonna build on that but it ain't happening . Was expecting so much more. Call it what you want but he ain't getting better and imo he's worse.
Yeah i know but sometimes the truth has to be said and sometimes its harsh. I dont like to sugar coat like a lot of apologists on here. I praised his play in the tourney last season which was a revelation and helped contribute to our title. But the fact is he has been absolutely terrible this year thus far and hasnt been very good since hes been here. I really hope he gets it together but i see absolutely no reason to believe he will. I mean come on, Brimah,Facey and even Lubin played well against that horrible coppin st frontcourt but Noland did Zilch !!!
Actually its a waste to spend time to research or even look up this stat.Anyone happen to know what his +/- would be?
Facey can score,hit free throws and most importantly rebounds and played very well against texas so his good by far outweighs his deficiencies same with Amidah. Nolan being better defensively is a stretch unless your simply talking against msu in the tourney ill give you that but to say hes better than Amidah thats nonsense. Amidah changes the game with his presence in the post. Sorry you dont like Nolan being called out but it is what it is.Nolan plays better defense than all of those you name on the post. Brimah blocks more shots and is scarier no doubt but Nolan is a better defender physically as long as he isn't looking for the charge only which is now a problem. Facey is not a good defender at all yet unless you count Coppin. We will see how much better he is now against Jefferson. While you like to hammer Phil as to not being good at all his stats will never be but there are still some decent things he does others can't do like it or not. Not all rosey with the one's you prefer to discuss!
I really think Phil will start regressing to the mean and start playing at least as well as he did last year...TSam as well...and that should boost the team's fortunes considerablyNolan plays better defense than all of those you name on the post. Brimah blocks more shots and is scarier no doubt but Nolan is a better defender physically as long as he isn't looking for the charge only which is now a problem. Facey is not a good defender at all yet unless you count Coppin. We will see how much better he is now against Jefferson. While you like to hammer Phil as to not being good at all his stats will never be but there are still some decent things he does others can't do like it or not. Not all rosey with the one's you prefer to discuss!
Lubin has been inconsistent, which is better than being consistently terrible, which is what Phil has been. Nolan isn't doing anything well enough to fill a role. We need someone who can give our bigs a rest, and at this point, I'm not sure that Lubin wouldn't be better suited to that.
Facey can score,hit free throws and most importantly rebounds and played very well against texas so his good by far outweighs his deficiencies same with Amidah. Nolan being better defensively is a stretch unless your simply talking against msu in the tourney ill give you that but to say hes better than Amidah thats nonsense. Amidah changes the game with his presence in the post. Sorry you dont like Nolan being called out but it is what it is.
I'm struggling to think of wtf you've seen out of Lubin to think he'd be better suited to get more minutes. Are we watching the same guy?