No Foul – Game was over | The Boneyard

No Foul – Game was over

.-.
Thought this still from the other thread showed it better. If they had called the foul would they have gone to the monitor to see if the foul occurred after the buzzer?
1581280213444.png
 
That seems to show it all. Also, when the play happened in real time, it looked like he also traveled but I'd like to see the replay on that aspect. Anyone see the replay on that part?
 
CTFAN4LIFE said:
That seems to show it all. Also, when the play happened in real time, it looked like he also traveled but I'd like to see the replay on that aspect. Anyone see the replay on that part?
Expand ...

Yes, he absolutely traveled. Once he took that step-back, his feet were set. He threw another jab step after to try to initiate contact. Should have been a travel.
 
It’s about time that one of these close calls or non calls went our way. I felt as if Akok didn’t have enough control of the ball to be called for travel and he was actually tripped by Cumberland. I also feel like they missed the push on Josh when he was called out of bounds. Finally, something went our way. YOU know very well this could have been a foul easily.
 
.-.
WhereistheDove? said:
Yes, he absolutely traveled. Once he took that step-back, his feet were set. He threw another jab step after to try to initiate contact. Should have been a travel.
Expand ...
Thanks - it looked that way to the naked eye.
 
4NCsMORE2Go said:
It’s about time that one of these close calls or non calls went our way. I felt as if Akok didn’t have enough control of the ball to be called for travel and he was actually tripped by Cumberland. I also feel like they missed the push on Josh when he was called out of bounds. Finally, something went our way. YOU know very well this could have been a foul easily.
Expand ...
With all the garbage calls that have went against us this year...on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being most guilty, and 1 being least guilty, Im about a negative 200.
 
Was in the car and the radio guy says a foul occurred but was not called. Even our own announcer.
 
.-.
I hadn't actually seen the clock element of this. And the CBS announcers went on about how it was a foul. It sure looked like one to me. Unless of course it was after time had expired. :)
 
ConnEd said:
I hadn't actually seen the clock element of this. And the CBS announcers went on about how it was a foul. It sure looked like one to me. Unless of course it was after time had expired. :)
Expand ...
It looked like Cumberland jumped into Vital and initiated the contact. Announcer seemed to be hoping Cincinnati would win.
 
Last edited:
amidagoat said:
I'm enjoying seeing Cincy fans complain on twitter right now about AAC officials
Expand ...
Kitaman said:
Ever seen our chat room?
Expand ...
Could it be both fan bases are right??? Is it possible the AAC officials do suck, which is why won today? Yes. Yes, they do suck and that is why won. Message to cinci fans: live with it. We UConn fans had to. Especially this year.
 
Slo-mo'd a few plays at the end. First, the ball did graze off of Bouknight's fingers, but from the angle they showed you couldn't tell if it was still in contact with Williams arm after that. IMO, there wasn't enough to overturn the call on the court.

Second, Cumberland's feet were still on the floor when time expired (as shown in the screenshot above), so when he jumped into Vital, the clock had already expired. So even if it was a foul, it was after the game was over.

Great win in the type of game we had been losing this year!
 
jibsey said:
Was in the car and the radio guy says a foul occurred but was not called. Even our own announcer.
Expand ...
AtlHusky said:
Slo-mo'd a few plays at the end. First, the ball did graze off of Bouknight's fingers, but from the angle they showed you couldn't tell if it was still in contact with Williams arm after that. IMO, there wasn't enough to overturn the call on the court.

Second, Cumberland's feet were still on the floor when time expired (as shown in the screenshot above), so when he jumped into Vital, the clock had already expired. So even if it was a foul, it was after the game was over.
Expand ...
So you're saying the radio announcer was wrong? Well alright then.
 
AtlHusky said:
Slo-mo'd a few plays at the end. First, the ball did graze off of Bouknight's fingers, but from the angle they showed you couldn't tell if it was still in contact with Williams arm after that. IMO, there wasn't enough to overturn the call on the court.

Second, Cumberland's feet were still on the floor when time expired (as shown in the screenshot above), so when he jumped into Vital, the clock had already expired. So even if it was a foul, it was after the game was over.

Great win in the type of game we had been losing this year!
Expand ...

How many times have we heard the review was not conclusive so the call stands? Only in the AAC.
We replayed those last 2.7 seconds a frame at a time and it's clear the backboard is lit up when the contact happened so no foul. It was annoying, to say the least, to listen to that Villanova grad going on about how there was a foul without replaying it in slo-mo to verify it. Of course, they had to get to the Purple Aces game so there wasn't time. :rolleyes:
 
.-.
First of all the reversal was wrong. Not because I'm sure the ball didn't go off of Bouks finger tips but because you couldn't tell for sure if it stayed in contact with the Cincy players forearm directing it the way it went. No way they can reverse that considering their call.

On the last play of the OT first of all Cumberland was taking too long to try to get open, great job by CV, and then after a little travel which they never call CV went straight up and Cumby forced the contact moving forward into CV knowing he wasn't getting the shot off so why not try to get to the line. No call, clock or not, would've been the right call anyway.
 
mauconnfan said:
First of all the reversal was wrong. Not because I'm sure the ball didn't go off of Bouks finger tips but because you couldn't tell for sure if it stayed in contact with the Cincy players forearm directing it the way it went. No way they can reverse that considering their call.

On the last play of the OT first of all Cumberland was taking too long to try to get open, great job by CV, and then after a little travel which they never call CV went straight up and Cumby forced the contact moving forward into CV knowing he wasn't getting the shot off so why not try to get to the line. No call, clock or not, would've been the right call anyway.
Expand ...

This annoyed me quite a bit. Unless the refs had a different camera angle (from the side) there was absolutely no way to tell whether that went off his arm. Should not have been reversed.
 
HuskyHawk said:
Yeah I said this in the chat. Replay showed it clearly. It was otherwise a foul on Vital.
Expand ...
That’s one that I feel generally doesn’t get called. Cumberland was just playing for the foul, which refs seem to rarely reward on last second shots. That being said, he traveled to initiate that contact and it was after time expired so the right outcome happened regardless.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,557
Messages
4,583,075
Members
10,493
Latest member
Mwil1032


Top Bottom