No first team all big east. | Page 2 | The Boneyard

No first team all big east.

Peavy has been a monster to end the year (stepping up when Sorber went down). 23, 7, and 4.5 from February on (9 games) while being one of the best perimeter defenders in the league.

Hard to reconcile that with 10 ppg in December for awards though.

This guy has “Bad Team Superstar” written all over him. He is a stats monster recently, but Georgetown has beaten Villanova (x2), Butler, Seton Hall and Providence since January 3. Feels more like a second or third team player.

I agree with the other selections.
 
I’m not upset with Peavy on the first team. He’s putting up numbers on a bad team, but he still put up the numbers. If it was Ashworth, Solo, or Kadary instead of him, I also wouldn’t be upset with it

50/50 on Kalkbrenner vs Luis for POY. Both had great seasons for successful teams

Last year I’m pretty sure the coaches voted Devin Carter just so Tristen Newton wouldn’t win. If they follow the same logic (beast player on a bad team), then it 100% should be Eric Dixon with no question. But I think that voting logic was a one-time thing
 
I’m not upset with Peavy on the first team. He’s putting up numbers on a bad team, but he still put up the numbers. If it was Ashworth, Solo, or Kadary instead of him, I also wouldn’t be upset with it

50/50 on Kalkbrenner vs Luis for POY. Both had great seasons for successful teams

Last year I’m pretty sure the coaches voted Devin Carter just so Tristen Newton wouldn’t win. If they follow the same logic (beast player on a bad team), then it 100% should be Eric Dixon with no question. But I think that voting logic was a one-time thing
Do you really think they voted Carter so Newton wouldn’t win? UConn had a gluttony of talent last year, Carter carried PC.
 
Do you really think they voted Carter so Newton wouldn’t win? UConn had a gluttony of talent last year, Carter carried PC.
The last time a BE POY wasn’t in the top 5 teams was 2000. Not counting the weird triple-winner year in 2021, the last time a BE POY wasn’t top 3 was 2016

In a year when the BE had 3 AP All Americans, I refuse to believe that the POY voting was honest in giving it to Devin Carter. He carried them, but carried them to .500 and an NIT berth

If Eric Dixon wins POY this year then I’ll admit I was wrong and the criteria is just different now. He’s had a better individual season and Nova is 1 game ahead of where PC was. If not, then I have to start asking why the BE voted with that set of criteria for 1 year and 1 year only
 
The last time a BE POY wasn’t in the top 5 teams was 2000. Not counting the weird triple-winner year in 2021, the last time a BE POY wasn’t top 3 was 2016

In a year when the BE had 3 AP All Americans, I refuse to believe that the POY voting was honest in giving it to Devin Carter. He carried them, but carried them to .500 and an NIT berth

If Eric Dixon wins POY this year then I’ll admit I was wrong and the criteria is just different now. He’s had a better individual season and Nova is 1 game ahead of where PC was. If not, then I have to start asking why the BE voted with that set of criteria for 1 year and 1 year only
Carter was a ridiculous all around player and a lottery pick. I don’t think that because he was an outlier to a trend means the fix was on. He deserved it.
 
.-.
The last time a BE POY wasn’t in the top 5 teams was 2000. Not counting the weird triple-winner year in 2021, the last time a BE POY wasn’t top 3 was 2016

In a year when the BE had 3 AP All Americans, I refuse to believe that the POY voting was honest in giving it to Devin Carter. He carried them, but carried them to .500 and an NIT berth

If Eric Dixon wins POY this year then I’ll admit I was wrong and the criteria is just different now. He’s had a better individual season and Nova is 1 game ahead of where PC was. If not, then I have to start asking why the BE voted with that set of criteria for 1 year and 1 year only
How about because in '24 the Big EAst's dominant team really didn't have A dominant player. Rational people could have thought any of our starters but Alex was UConn's MVP. When opinions split like that, a dominant best player on some other team has a path to winning.
 
.-.
Just to compare, Alex's season against the BE First Team selections.

GGSMPFGFGAFG%3P3PA3P%2P2PA2P%eFG%FTFTAFT%ORBDRBTRBASTSTLBLKTOVPFPTS
Kalkbrenner303033.67.711.766.3%0.61.734.0%7.210.071.7%68.7%3.34.869.0%2.46.69.01.60.62.71.31.319.4
Peavy313137.06.714.247.6%1.64.139.7%5.110.150.8%53.3%1.82.865.1%1.74.05.73.62.30.52.62.916.9
Kam Jones313133.47.715.948.5%1.85.830.6%5.910.158.8%54.1%1.72.664.6%0.63.84.56.11.50.31.82.118.9
Ejiofor313031.64.88.457.3%0.31.125.7%4.57.362.2%59.0%4.26.268.2%4.33.88.21.50.91.51.82.514.1
Luis Jr302731.96.514.644.6%1.23.930.8%5.310.749.7%48.7%3.95.374.2%2.15.07.12.21.40.62.22.218.1
E Dixon303034.97.916.946.5%3.07.142.9%4.89.849.2%55.5%4.95.982.5%1.53.85.42.10.70.32.22.023.6
Karaban292936.14.911.244.0%2.16.035.3%2.85.253.9%53.4%2.63.183.1%1.83.55.22.80.51.61.31.914.5
 
Peavy on the First team is a stretch to me.

View attachment 107594
IMG_6272.jpeg
 
Worth nothing when only looking at Big East games, and omitting non conference numbers we see

PEAVY: 19.15ppg on 48.8% from the field and 42.6% from 3pt range with 6.55 rebounds a game, 3.45 assists a game, 2.2 steals a game, and 0.3 blocks a game

his numbers are better when looking at big east games in comparison to the entire season, whereas Karaban's season long numbers are inflated by non-conference games and his big east game stats are much worse.

KARABAN: 14.05ppg on 42.6% from the field and 31.5% from 3pt range with 5.35 rebounds a game, 2.7 assists a game, 0.45 steals a game, and 1.55 blocks a game.

If there was an argument for Peavy to not make the First Team I think its necessary to say who should have deserved the spot. I love Karaban and I'm not looking to bad mouth him at all but it is baffling to me to try to claim he deserved the spot over Peavy while he was in the fan bases dog house for the past 1.5 months. So if Peavy wasn't deserving of the spot, who got robbed?
 
Worth nothing when only looking at Big East games, and omitting non conference numbers we see

PEAVY: 19.15ppg on 48.8% from the field and 42.6% from 3pt range with 6.55 rebounds a game, 3.45 assists a game, 2.2 steals a game, and 0.3 blocks a game

his numbers are better when looking at big east games in comparison to the entire season, whereas Karaban's season long numbers are inflated by non-conference games and his big east game stats are much worse.

KARABAN: 14.05ppg on 42.6% from the field and 31.5% from 3pt range with 5.35 rebounds a game, 2.7 assists a game, 0.45 steals a game, and 1.55 blocks a game.

If there was an argument for Peavy to not make the First Team I think its necessary to say who should have deserved the spot. I love Karaban and I'm not looking to bad mouth him at all but it is baffling to me to try to claim he deserved the spot over Peavy while he was in the fan bases dog house for the past 1.5 months. So if Peavy wasn't deserving of the spot, who got robbed?
I would've given it to Freemantle- in Big East play 17/9/3 on 58% field goal and Xavier is way better than Georgetown.
 
.-.
If you tell me I can have Freemantle or Peavy on my team, I'll take Peavy every time.

If Freemantle could stay healthy, I would probably lean Freemantle.
 
And you'll lose to DePaul.
Freemantle and Xavier's Sweet 16 team from 2023 lost to DePaul which was much worse than this year's DePaul team. But that is a team issue, Peavy is a good two-way player while Freemantle is very good on offense but nothing special on defense.
 
Freemantle and Xavier's Sweet 16 team from 2023 lost to DePaul which was much worse than this year's DePaul team. But that is a team issue, Peavy is a good two-way player while Freemantle is very good on offense but nothing special on defense.
Yeah, I'll take Freemantle.
 
Tarris is a starter that got 6th man? I mean that’s what he really is though Samson has come on very recently.
 
.-.
Tarris is a starter that got 6th man? I mean that’s what he really is though Samson has come on very recently.
He doesn't start. Much as people here don't like that, he is eligible for sixth man of the year. Why wouldn't he be?
 
Tarris is a starter that got 6th man? I mean that’s what he really is though Samson has come on very recently.
He started 1 game when Samson was out. He came off the bench. That's the definition of the award.
 
He started 1 game when Samson was out. He came off the bench. That's the definition of the award.
Understood but how many minutes has Tarris played versus Samson?
He’s a sub who plays starter minutes and our starter played sub minutes.
He’s could come in after 1 minute, play 70% and still be 6th man?
He has at worst split the center job but he starts the game on the bench.
 
Understood but how many minutes has Tarris played versus Samson?
He’s a sub who plays starter minutes and our starter played sub minutes.
He’s could come in after 1 minute, play 70% and still be 6th man?
He has at worst split the center job but he starts the game on the bench.
in 20 Big East games Tarris logged 20 or less minutes in 12 of them
 
in 20 Big East games Tarris logged 20 or less minutes in 12 of them
Yeah but he played more than Samson. He’s been our primary center all year. Hurley was loyal to Johnson letting him start. If that is a 6th man ok and congrats to him on the recognition.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,160
Messages
4,555,220
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom