Well you are lying because you don't "know". You can speculate and guess and even believe (and that's really what it is). But you don't know.
Are you of the opinion that if the Huskies do not win the NC it is due to them not playing well? Or, are you embracing the inverse corollary to that: the only way the Huskies win the NC is by playing well against the Top 5?
Neither, and that's the point. I don't have a evidence for that (and neither do you). But you're speculating, guessing, not "knowing".
Sorry, you're just out to lunch on this. You'd think after following this team for as long as you say, you'd know better. But I guess it just never clicks for some people.
This latest post of yours underscores why your previous post was nonsense.
On one hand, you state: that "we know IF we play well we can easily beat most mid ranked to unranked teams easily." The premise behind your statement was:
you know because you have seen it. On the other hand, you state in another post that "Geno knows, but we don't".
You didn't you use the term "speculate" in either of those statements pertaining to you and Geno, did you? Of course not, you used the term "know".
Nor did you take the undeniable position that nobody can see the future - not you, not Geno, not anyone else. If you would have, I'm guessing you probably would have eliminated any pushback. Certainly from me.
Instead, you ridiculously opted to base your contention of not knowing if we can play well against Top 5 teams simply on the premise that the world hasn't seen it happen yet
this year.
The definition of speculating is forming a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm or conclusive evidence.
What is my firm evidence for knowing that
this team can and will play well against Top Five opponents? Simple: past history of this program under Geno, coupled with this team's exceptional talent, resilience, depth, and development as the season has progressed. Every time UConn has had a team close to this year's caliber, they have played well against Top Five opponents in the NCAA tournament.
Visual and historical evidence is all I need to take the posture that "I know". Your "knowledge", on the other hand, is limited to what you have seen thus far. What a pity.