- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 13,727
- Reaction Score
- 40,696
No.Do you at least admit that there is a significant advantage to the team that randomly happens to win the coin toss?
No.Do you at least admit that there is a significant advantage to the team that randomly happens to win the coin toss?
Arguing against statistical fact. I would expect nothing less from you Deepster.No.
My career is based solely on analyzing statistics. And the one thing I do know for certain is, you can spin any number to say whatever you want it to say.Arguing against statistical fact. I would expect nothing less from you Deepster.
Well so far you've been pretty awful at it in this discussion.My career is based solely on analyzing statistics. And the one thing I do know for certain is, you can spin any number to say whatever you want it to say.
Frankly, what's wrong with OT is the fact both teams must touch the ball unless a TD is scored. It should be any score wins the game.
It’s fine the way they have it now, defenses get paid to stop offenses from getting into the end zone, would not be in favor of full 15 minute OT the baseball model I stated above I would be open to.That is even worse. That's the old rule.
What's wrong is that it alters the game. Just play a 15 minute quarter and leave it at that. Still tied, play another.
That is even worse. That's the old rule.
What's wrong is that it alters the game. Just play a 15 minute quarter and leave it at that. Still tied, play another.
EnochRoot: "I don't see the issue"This whole debate is like an engineer looking to solve problems that don't exist.
That's opinion. And I get it. I know what makes you tick here and I understand.Well so far you've been pretty awful at it in this discussion.