New Rule For Transfers Proposed | The Boneyard

New Rule For Transfers Proposed

Joined
Aug 5, 2017
Messages
4,087
Reaction Score
10,875
Have to admit Cal (along with Izzo) are on target with their support for a change in the transfer rules:

Proposal: Each player would be allowed to transfer one time without sitting out.

 
"The transfer portal is way worse than NIL," Izzo said. "What the transfer portal does is gives a lot of middlemen a chance to come in. What I think is bothering me and my sport the most is the way people are tampering with people throughout the year."

"Even in the NFL, NBA, you don't tamper with a guy who has a four-year contract," he said. "The portal never closes because you have too many dirtbags who are tampering with people and players. The worst thing I see is the tampering."


 
Maybe add where a second transfer player could play immediately if but they are ineligible to collect any NIL money for that first year at the new school.
 
Coaches should only be able to take a new job every 4 years then.
Just stop. Not even roughly comparable. NFL and NBA and major league players can’t just walk if the team brings in a new head coach or GM or manager. Heck you can’t move if the team is sold and you are under contract. If Hank fires Boone on Tuesday, Judge should be able to move to Boston next season under your theory.
 
Coaches should only be able to take a new job every 4 years then.
Buy out clauses would also work.

I assume part of the problem is universities being resistant to formal contacts to get around labor laws.
 
One free transfer then sit a year anytime after unless the head coach leaves
Why do you want to allow changes if the coach leaves? These guys are now professionals whatever you want to call them. As I said above, Judge can’t leave the Yankees if Boone goes. The Pats quarterback wasn’t allowed to leave when the coach got fired. The CT Sun players don’t become free agents and in that case the team is being sold to new owners AND being moved to a new city. Maybe it was a legitimate argument when players were actually amateurs. Today, it is phony as a $3 bill. The coach left. Cry me a river. Then just suck it up and play to impress the new guy!
 
Just stop. Not even roughly comparable. NFL and NBA and major league players can’t just walk if the team brings in a new head coach or GM or manager. Heck you can’t move if the team is sold and you are under contract. If Hank fires Boone on Tuesday, Judge should be able to move to Boston next season under your theory.
Wouldn’t be opposed to this
 
I don’t know if the courts would rule against this but how about an x, y, z rule where x is the maximum number of players that can transfer into a given program in one year, y is the maximum number of players that can transfer over a determined period (z).

For example X could be 3 or 4 players max a year. Y can be 10 - 12 players over a period (z) of 4 - 6 years.
 
Coaches should have to sit out a year after signing on to a new school, so they can focus on the core competencies of their new institution, and develop a greater appreciation of the opportunity given to them

I've gone to the Champions Classic (Kentucky, Michigan State, Kansas, Duke) almost every year since inception - last year watched a kid named Cooper Flagg turn the ball over 3x at the end of the game, in a loss to Kentucky, so the final four was no surprise to me ... this year I'm sitting it out, and let the organizers know they need to change the name of the event to "The Classic" until they invite UConn, but I digress, lol

It's really sad to watch Cal and Izzo lose their grip on the total control they once thrived on - the same control that built their legacies (and fortunes).

... there's always talk about rolling things back to the "good old days" ... let's roll back the whole thing - freshman cannot play (that might solve that 1-and-done thing), and let's cut coaches pay so they have to moonlight teaching badminton at the ymca to make ends meet
 

Online statistics

Members online
238
Guests online
1,114
Total visitors
1,352

Forum statistics

Threads
164,055
Messages
4,380,470
Members
10,172
Latest member
mangers


.
..
Top Bottom