- Joined
- Dec 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,561
- Reaction Score
- 7,901
Lol. My apologies for wanting to learn a bit. No need for the arrogance.It’s simple math and probability. It’s not rocket science
Lol. My apologies for wanting to learn a bit. No need for the arrogance.It’s simple math and probability. It’s not rocket science
Can you agree that being 11-1 in games decided by 5 points or less in one season is a statistical anomaly?A bit of recency bias here since they struggled with Depaul and Butler. Besides those two every other game decided by 5 points or less is a top 68 team on KenPom:
Wisconsin 25
Northwestern 68
TT 7
Uconn 18
Seton hall 37
Xavier 35
Marquette 32
St. John’s 66
DePaul 109
Nova 12
Butler 135
That wasn’t aimed at you. It was a general commentLol. My apologies for wanting to learn a bit. No need for the arrogance.
Yes, definitely. I think I just get frustrated because I perceive our fanbase frequently calling them lucky as jealously & we have no reason to be jealous whatsoever. I want a rematch to prove who is the better team - UConn.Can you agree that being 11-1 in games decided by 5 points or less in one season is a statistical anomaly?
It is not jealousy. Nationally PC is a completely irrelevant program, they have 1 tournament win since the Clinton administration. People are simply stating facts. This board is far from the only place questioning how good this PC team actually is.Yes, definitely. I think I just get frustrated because I perceive our fanbase frequently calling them lucky as jealously & we have no reason to be jealous whatsoever. I want a rematch to prove who is the better team - UConn.
Was going to mention that myself. Wish there were some way to beat Creighton and still meet Providence in the BET. Don't trust the Friars to make it to the final.At this point, I’m trying to be optimistic and see it as a win-win. Either we beat Creighton, lock in the BET 3-seed, and stay hot, or they beat us, we fall to the 4, and have PC potentially in the semis for an easier road to the BE final instead of Nova.
It’s not jealousy; it’s insecurity.Yes, definitely. I think I just get frustrated because I perceive our fanbase frequently calling them lucky as jealously & we have no reason to be jealous whatsoever. I want a rematch to prove who is the better team - UConn.
And Daniels (84% foul shooter) missing a 1-and-1 with 30 seconds left with Villanova up by 4 isn’t lucky?Last night PC had two players foul out. The game was 70-70 at the end of regulation, Xavier went up 75-70 with 2:15 remaining. Jones missed a key free throw and the OT ended 75-75. That was pretty lucky.
Are we talking Federal Hill types?Clearly Providence is sending hit men to enfeeble their opponents before playing them.
Let's just say their names end in vowels, and they might be involved in the trash business.Are we talking Federal Hill types?
as of tuesday lunardi had them as the 3rd of the "last 4 byes" teams so there were/are only 5 teams between them and the wrong side of the bubble.Creighton isn’t on the bubble, they’re squarely in.
Well, Uconn should win out now.That's too bad, felt like Creighton was just hitting their stride.
Of course this happens right before they play the lucky Friars too.
I won’t pretend to have any insight into the algorithm behind the luck metric on KenPom as my AP statistics teacher in HS couldn’t have cared less about helping us learn. With that said I’d love to know why them being 11-1 in games decided by 5 points or less makes them lucky. To me that shows poise & composure when it matters most on a consistent basis, not luck.
The ghost of Buddy C.Clearly Providence is sending hit men to enfeeble their opponents before playing them.
bite your tongue!Creighton isn’t on the bubble, they’re squarely in. Horrible loss for them, it’s like us losing Cole.
And Daniels (84% foul shooter) missing a 1-and-1 with 30 seconds left with Villanova up by 4 isn’t lucky?
Injured his wrist going for a steal at St. John's last night. Creighton is on the right of the bubble but they have a tough schedule coming up - @ Providence, vs. us, and vs. Hall.