Neinas: Wvu's Entrance Contingent On Being Available Next Year | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Neinas: Wvu's Entrance Contingent On Being Available Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
41
Reaction Score
4
You are all reading a whole lot into nothing. If you honestly think WVa is going to be around next year and not playing it's away games in the Midwest, you're naive.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,326
Reaction Score
5,513
You are all reading a whole lot into nothing. If you honestly think WVa is going to be around next year and not playing it's away games in the Midwest, you're naive.

O.K. Einstein -- if WVU knew it could play its road games in the midwest next year, why did they need to go to court to get a Declaratory Judgment saying they could? You mean they weren't ready to rely on your legal opinion?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
981
Reaction Score
826
You are all reading a whole lot into nothing. If you honestly think WVa is going to be around next year and not playing it's away games in the Midwest, you're naive.

I don't think most of us care. I certainly don't but I want to make sure we have something in place to protect UConn's interests. I don't give a crap what happens to WVU after that.
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,157
Reaction Score
24,790
This is #begharder B12 style. I thought the math didn't work for WVU and.Missouri.

This should end in one of two ways. Once it has 12 teams, the BE trades longer term AQ status to drop the 27 month term for all teams.

Or, the B12 goes to 12 by adding BYU now at and WVU, UL later. If the get desperate perhaps an old SWAC school takes BYUs spot.

Everybody keep your arms and legal inside until the coaster has come to a complete stop.

Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
41
Reaction Score
4
O.K. Einstein -- if WVU knew it could play its road games in the midwest next year, why did they need to go to court to get a Declaratory Judgment saying they could? You mean they weren't ready to rely on your legal opinion?

Doing their due diligence through a little bit of paper work isn't going to put the breaks on what the B12, WVa, FOX and ESPN want. Once the wheels are in motion in one of these situations, there is no stopping them, it's going to happen.

You can sit there and hold out hope all you want, but just be prepared when the upcoming home slate is made up of the Conference USA Murderers Row.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,326
Reaction Score
5,513
Doing their due diligence through a little bit of paper work isn't going to put the breaks on what the B12, WVa, FOX and ESPN want. Once the wheels are in motion in one of these situations, there is no stopping them, it's going to happen.

You can sit there and hold out hope all you want, but just be prepared when the upcoming home slate is made up of the Conference USA Murderers Row.

You didn't offer any defense to your theory or rebuttal to my attack of it. But hey, you threw some buzz phrases around so maybe no one will notice.

WVU will be gone for the 2014 season. Earlier if the parties work something out, but that will require cooperation from leagues other than the Big XII. Insulting UConn's future doesn't change any of that.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
41
Reaction Score
4
You didn't offer any defense to your theory or rebuttal to my attack of it. But hey, you threw some buzz phrases around so maybe no one will notice.

WVU will be gone for the 2014 season. Earlier if the parties work something out, but that will require cooperation from leagues other than the Big XII. Insulting UConn's future doesn't change any of that.

I don't need to insult UConn's future when it's already dead in the water.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,326
Reaction Score
5,513
I don't need to insult UConn's future when it's already dead in the water.

Good one. See what you can come up with when your Mom doesn't edit your posts.

Care to answer why WVU needed to go to court if it already knows it's not staying in the Big East for next season?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
26,231
Reaction Score
31,819
So the Titanic said to the Hindenburg... "Dude you are totally F&&KED!!!"
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,797
Reaction Score
4,910
The CUSA schools and Boise can NOT join next year - WVU has to sit tight. Other than that and some minor legal niceties (which is what I suspect you feel the BE by-laws are), your arguments are sound. Go Colts!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,285
Reaction Score
9,284
I've said this before on othjer posts and I stand by it - - the B12 is doomed. They don't like each other, they don't trust each other and they are going to split someday soon. Noone trusts UT, OU wishes they could be California girls, OSU goes where OU wants, and schools like KU, KSU, ISU and Baylor are holding on by a thread. Why do you think Mizzou wants out so badly. For the life of me I don't understand why the SEC doesn't go after OU (and OSU). Regardless, moving to the B12 is like jumping from one sinking ship to another. They are stuck between two expansionist conferences - the Pac 12 and the SEC (not to mention the B10 is sitting back waiting for schools to fall to them).

I don't blame WVU for leaving the BE; I simply think they will find themselves pimping for a conference again, very soon.

Exactly. The B12 is teetering. Don't get me wrong, it's significantly more stable than the BE is today and will ever be, so I get why WVU and UL wanted in so badly. I hope all the BE FB schools land where they want to land, but let's not get it twisted, there are very valid reasons why Nebraska, Colorado, aTm, and Mizzou wanted out of what appeared to be a very solid and stable conference. Those reasons are just as real today as they were last year. I'm guessing Luck and Co in Mo'Town know this, but see it as an opportunity to better position themselves for the SEC in 5+/- years time when the house of cards comes crashing down around the Big Longhorn Conference. I have always pulled for WVU, and was actually hoping they'd land in the SEC. When they got the B12 invite, I was happy for them. And then they went the lawsuit route which could harm UConn and all of their partners (the BE FB schools).
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
981
Reaction Score
826
Doing their due diligence through a little bit of paper work isn't going to put the breaks on what the B12, WVa, FOX and ESPN want. Once the wheels are in motion in one of these situations, there is no stopping them, it's going to happen.

You can sit there and hold out hope all you want, but just be prepared when the upcoming home slate is made up of the Conference USA Murderers Row.

OK, we'll see who is ranked higher in the final BCS rankings this year. WVU or Boise St. and Houston. WVU will probably finish behind Cincy.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
927
Reaction Score
400
So WVU still hasn't even bothered to read the Big 12 bylaws yet?
That's what I was looking at! It's just outrageously stupid!

"We're just becoming familiar with the bylaws of the Big 12," Luck said. "There's lots of details we have to look at, but we'll get to that in due time and we'll make prudent decisions based on the best interests of our student-athletes and our university."
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2011
Messages
41,055
Reaction Score
2,354
You didn't offer any defense to your theory or rebuttal to my attack of it. But hey, you threw some buzz phrases around so maybe no one will notice.

WVU will be gone for the 2014 season. Earlier if the parties work something out, but that will require cooperation from leagues other than the Big XII. Insulting UConn's future doesn't change any of that.

If WVU really wants to play in the Big XII next year I do not believe there is anything that a court will do to stop it. As I am sure you know, the ordinary remedy for breach of contract is monetary damages, not specific performance. That being said, I agree with you that Neinas' comments were not advisable from a litigation standpoint.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,326
Reaction Score
5,513
If WVU really wants to play in the Big XII next year I do not believe there is anything that a court will do to stop it. As I am sure you know, the ordinary remedy for breach of contract is monetary damages, not specific performance. That being said, I agree with you that Neinas' comments were not advisable from a litigation standpoint.

But you've stated a truism that doesn't add anything. Of course monetary damages is the "ordinary remedy," but that doesn't eliminate equitable relief where the standards are met (likelihood of success on the merits and irreperable harm). Care to comment on why you are confident the Big East couldn't prevail on that? You may ultimately be correct, but you haven't provided enough for anyone to be able to evaluate the likelihood of that..
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
If WVU really wants to play in the Big XII next year I do not believe there is anything that a court will do to stop it. As I am sure you know, the ordinary remedy for breach of contract is monetary damages, not specific performance. That being said, I agree with you that Neinas' comments were not advisable from a litigation standpoint.

I am not a lawyer (so take my opinion with a grain of salt)...but I think it is more likely that the court rules that they cannot force WVU to play in the Big East, but they can force them not to be able to join another conference until 2014 because of their contract with the Big East.

So WVU's choice will be to stay in the BE until 2014, or completely blow up their schedule by going independent, losing the BCS bid possibility, losing all bowl affiliations, losing all TV agreements (no TV would kill recruiting) and losing out on the Big East revenue. I am sure they would much rather be in the BE for those 2 years than go independent on such short notice.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
14
Reaction Score
42
For the law people out there, anyone have an educated guess as to how long this might take in the court system to figured out whether WVU has to stay in the BE, or whether they can leave. Normally, as someone that has no idea about law, I would say this is a mess and guess a couple years. But I'm assuming this can get expedited somehow given the time frame WVU is trying to leave in. Anyone know?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,326
Reaction Score
5,513
For the law people out there, anyone have an educated guess as to how long this might take in the court system to figured out whether WVU has to stay in the BE, or whether they can leave. Normally, as someone that has no idea about law, I would say this is a mess and guess a couple years. But I'm assuming this can get expedited somehow given the time frame WVU is trying to leave in. Anyone know?

There are no hard and set rules, and it varies by jurisdiction, but given that the case for equitable relief doesn't need to get into ESPN or the Big XII, and given the time frame (that we're talking about a season that starts in 10 months), I would think 3 to 4 months. But that's not much more than a WAG.

A full case, including damages, would be more than a year under almost any scenario.
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,172
Reaction Score
33,030
The most amazing part of this thread is how many posters think you can just bust a contract with minor consequences. If you don't like a deal you signed, just walk away. It's that easy!!!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
531
Reaction Score
610
If WVU really wants to play in the Big XII next year I do not believe there is anything that a court will do to stop it. As I am sure you know, the ordinary remedy for breach of contract is monetary damages, not specific performance. That being said, I agree with you that Neinas' comments were not advisable from a litigation standpoint.

What the court can do is make the monetary damages too high for WVU to be able to afford to go to the B-12. The loss of the BCS status is somewhere around $23 million a year plus their $5 millon buyout I think $28 million would be too much for the mountaineers to recover especially since they are part-earners for the first few years in the B-12
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,326
Reaction Score
5,513
The most amazing part of this thread is how many posters think you can just bust a contract with minor consequences. If you don't like a deal you signed, just walk away. It's that easy!!!

Where would they get that from? Maybe from many on the board who assumed the Big East could just get out of its ESPN deal whenver it wanted, or ignore the exclusive negotiating window that was in that agreement?
 

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
especially since they are part-earners for the first few years in the B-12

I don't think that is true. While TCU doesn't get a full share the first few years in the B12, I am pretty sure that I read that WVU will get a full share of revenue from the get go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
420
Guests online
2,894
Total visitors
3,314

Forum statistics

Threads
157,162
Messages
4,085,972
Members
9,982
Latest member
CJasmer


Top Bottom