I think she's really talented. It's almost like they have a logjam in their front line and she has been negatively impacted (kinda like AE last year). Watson being in foul trouble probably lead to her playing more minutes today.For anybody( maybe just me) who has been wondering where the Maddy Westbeld ,who was all ACC as a frosh, has been, she certainly showed up today. Been averaging 7pts,6 boards 2 assists, today had 17 ,9, and 4, and blocked 3 shots. Had a modest year last year; wonder if she was hurt. Back to her frosh year, she would make them very tough.
The rebounding difference was in defensive rebounds and that was because Notre Dame didn't miss many shots and UConn did. The offensive board numbers were about even.
ND grabbed 8 offensive boards and UConn grabbed 7 offensive boards. Not one ND player grabbed more than 1 offensive rebound. Actually, 4 ND players are given credit for 1 offensive rebound.The Irish got 32% of their missed shots, UConn got 19% of their missed shots. The Huskies were dominated on the boards.
ND grabbed 8 offensive boards and UConn grabbed 7 offensive boards. Not one ND player grabbed more than 1 offensive rebound. Actually, 4 ND players are given credit for 1 offensive rebound.
The difference on the defensive boards was 31-19.
Overall, the difference was 39-26.
Rebounding was not the reason this game was lost. It was shot-making.
Because I know what it looks like when UConn is dominated on the boards and this was not one of those games. Who cares about %s when the numbers are low. Four offensive boards were team rebounds where the ball was probably a 50-50 ball that was last touched by a UConn player. The other 4 were credited to 4 ND players.Why are you comparing total offensive rebounds when one team had far more opportunities at them than the other?
Again, 32% to 19%.
I never said UConn lost only due to rebounding, but it was an issue along with both offense and defense.
Not sure where you're getting the 13 more possessions. ND and UConn took the same number of shots -- 57. ND made 32 FGs and UConn made 21 FGs. UConn made 2 more 3FGs than ND. UConn took 6 more FTs (13-7) and ND turned the ball over 3 more times (18-15). Second chance points were the same at 10 points. This was not like South Carolina putting up 15 more FGAs off of offensive rebounds.Rebounding was clearly a factor. That's 13 more possesions and if you convert half of them it's over 10 points on the scoreboard. Plus their rebounding our misses drove their fast break conversions. Rebounding difference was one of the top reasons for the loss. And we should have expected it going in. They have a lot of bigs and we do not currently.
We got out coached today to a degree also. Notre Dame's game plan was textbook in how to beat this years team. Leave Aubrey and Nika open for jump shots and double others. Deny Azzi and Lou. Box out and dominate the paint. We were playing this game but the outcome was all dependent upon our weaknesses perfoming at least average. Nika did her part today at least some. Aubrey had a bad day.
This doesn't knock us out of the top 10 or even the top 5. I can't believe some of the things I read sometimes. We've beat 3 top 10 teams and lost to one. It's not the end of the world.
I think we are going to keep seeing this sort of deny defense though. One way to help fight it is to give the ball to Azzi earlier, as in putting her in Olivia Miles mode as a quasi PG. Let Azzi beat them off the dribble some, or at least penetrate. Set high screens for her. If she didn't get hurt I'm sure Geno would have adjusted in some way.
A normal Caroline could have helped win this game. We need her back to game form asap. Dorka as well, obviously.
I love Rebecca (saw her in the '95 parade as a little kid and loved her ever since, especially she ended up settling down near where I grew up). She is a fantastic advocate for UConn wbb and I admire her accomplishments. That being said, yeah, I have felt for some time now that she goes out of her way to seem impartial - beyond what seems necessary.agree with most of the comments here. On a separate topic, wanted to see what the BY thinks of Rebecca Lobo calling the games. Sometimes it seems to me that since the nation knows her as a Husky, she goes out of her way to praise (and over praise) the other team, especially our heated rivals. I know she has to be impartial, but sometimes it feels like too much. I really like watching Husky games with other announcers.
Geno's limited playing of Amari continues to baffle me. I mean could she have shot, rebounded, and been outhustled, and been frazzled any worse than Aubrey? I could see if we had a full squad, but with all the injuries? What a wasted resource....In the course of a season, this counts only as a loss. Of course, there is distaste because it was ND. In the bigger picture, there are a few concerns. Let's hope Aziz is OK - held out as a precaution. Without her in the lineup, Conn's offense struggled in the half court. ND killed UConn on the glass, essentially shutting down the transition game.
Dora was missed in this game - Aubrey is pushed around by bigger players underneath. She had a rough game offensively and Caroline seemed completely out of sorts today.
I hate to give ND credit, but Coach Ivey had a solid gameplay for UConn. After losing to MD last week, it was obvious they were prepared and ready to atone for that loss.
UConn has already had its share of injuries and looking at the UConn bench in the second half, there was too much talent sitting there.
Maybe the bright spot is Amari gave Geno something to think about going forward. She has looked more engaged her last two games and she has a nice stroke and is obviously confident taking the shot.
So, was the Iowa game an aberration? Yeesh, you wonder whether this team will ever be at full strength....Caroline is still way out of shape. You can really see her struggling to get back on defense. Not being able to work out and practice in the off season has really hurt her development. She has a lot of work to do in practice before she can be expected to contribute any meaning full minutes.
This is a very unfair critique of Azzi--ND focused their defense entirely on Azzi, sometimes with three people face-guarding her! What did you expect her to do? No, it was up to others to make the wide-open shots that the defense was giving them, because of the attention given to Azzi., to rebound and play defense. IMO, only Lou stepped up, the others had horrifically sub-par games.... Killer instinct? What a misguided observation...Azzi is not aggressive enough, It just doesn’t seam to be her nature. The ND guard wanted to crush UConn’s will, and she pretty much did. Azzi needs to get a killer instinct.
After watching Griffin for three years now, it is clearly evident that she is not a good shooter, she continues to be awkward at times on offense. She is a slasher with a great motor but not a solid shooter, and her body of work will never garner her an All-American selection...Griffen "took those shots" because she was open and other players were not, and she's been practicing those shots (but not under duress). She needs more practice shots to get confidence in them, so that she can feast on the opportunities defenses provide and become an All American.
If you look back to the Texas game, the issues that hurt UConn today against ND were there too. Our interior defense was lacking (even with Dorka-albeit she did play that game with a broken thumb). When we really needed a bucket against Texas, Azzi was really the only one who could provide it (scoring 17 of 20 4thQ pts that game). With a similar issue regarding dealing with size inside plus not having Azzi available, ND took advantage of those weaknesses.easy to see some weaknesses with this team. It's just that no one wanted to see them. We struggled to score against a top defense, especially with Azzi out.
Yes and whoever ends up with her will have quite the steal.Lou is a gamer bucket getter. Do yall think she can make and play in the W???