128 is one more game. While it is an extremely dumb idea, it doesn't really matter. In fact, screw it, 256 is easy to get to also. In fact - let's expand one more level and every team in America gets to play. Approximately 350 Div 1 teams. Make a bracket that has room for 512 teams. Give the top 100 teams byes into the second round (I dont know the exact math) and Voila! Everyone gets a participation medal!
No selection show needed. We can just use whatever ranking system that is already in place. I prefer KenPom.
I did not think . 64 X 2 = 128. It is just one more round! I think it only works , as many
have suggested, that the " first" round is in the form of a " play in round " where both
teams in the initial round are fighting to " get into" the regular 64 team brackets. I
still would mourn the loss of the WNIT. Maybe teams losing in the FIRST "play in round" could
authomaticly became the WNIT field??. Sure, it sounds like a "loser's bracket" but that
is something like the current FIBA format = losing in your initial POOL does not eliminate a
team from moving on ( note, the FIBA format for tie breakers is pretty complex , as is
their ranking of teams prior to FIBA tournaments). I believe the FIBA Women's
soccer has a formula for "seeding' has a formula of looking back at the last 8 YEARS
of games to decide the seedings of the pools. That is complex! = it includes consideration of the quality of
the past opponents, the strength of the " region" ( Africa / Asia / Europe / "Americas"
etc. The strength of it is that the FIBA world agrees to it and .. the cream rises to
the top when all is said and done.