It wasn't Boatright's absense in this game. There was absolutely no offense from our forecourt, and zero points from our bench.
Uconn was taken completely out of any of it's offensive sets. I doubt Boat would've made much difference had he played.
We desperately need to get the ball to our big guys in the right places. That, unfortunately, isn't happening.
I do agree with a lot of this post.
However, I have to disagree with the idea that Boatright doesn't give a lot to this team and is a huge difference. I think Lamb and Napier are both working without a safety net right now which is hurting their play tremendously. Everyone is saying, "UConn runs a slow offense with a lot of dribbling." but UConn is also trying to slow the game down right now so they aren't completely exposed for having zero depth in the backcourt.
Let's take the Cincy game first: Boatright being there for 25-30 minutes allows UConn to match up with Cincy's 4 guard offense with Napier/Lamb/Boatright/Giffey, which may or may not have worked but it allows the option. It was that offense which hurt UConn the most.
Against Tennessee, you could see Lamb and Napier were tired and they had to put in Allen for more minutes than you would like (though he was decent, he gave up a huge 3).
Overall, Boatright is also another player who can break down the defense and create shots for Drummond/Oriakhi/Smith/etc. Giffey is a good passer/shooter but can't create for others. Napier looks dead on his feet and Lamb looks like he is trying to conserve energy for the second half the past few games. The same can be said for the first few games without Boatright.
I have no idea if UConn wins those games with Boatright (because the defense was pretty good against both teams) but offensively he would be a huge help.