- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,742
- Reaction Score
- 16,144
http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcspo...lie-angling-for-big-east-postseason-hardware/
Gives some props to Bazz as well
Gives some props to Bazz as well
gotta finish up strong, Buzz and JT3 are his main comp right now
really? well fruck both of there pot belly fat asses.
really? well fruck both of there pot belly fat asses.
I would love to see a big east coaches one on one tournament. Like our chances
i mena thats not even a fair deal. ko runs with our team daily in practice and actually was a good player to boot.
The academic progress report does not measure academic progress.
Retroactive enforcement is unacceptable.
Punishing current players for the sins of those who are long gone is not logical.
Emmert abused his authority to settle a score with his former employer.
Certainly true.
This is the greatest injustice that has been visited upon on us and needs to be shouted to the heavens.
We might feel this way, but how else can you punish college programs? Using this argument costs us a ton of credibility and makes us sound like whiners, which severely undermines what should be the only point of contention, above.
Also certainly true, and maybe with the Miami fiasco the media will turn a more critical eye on the NCAA and its leadership.
Since UConn won't be playing in the Big East Tournament what happens if a UConn player or coach wins an award? Will they just not be there to receive it? Or do the individuals get invited to the awards dinner and the rest of team stays home?
Yeah, as mentioned the "punishing current players" aspect doesn't hold water. Otherwise no punishment is possible in college.
It's the retroactive part. They changed the rules halfway through. That should have been the school's top -- maybe only -- argument from the beginning.
Exactly why I want to see it
I agree 100%.Yeah, as mentioned the "punishing current players" aspect doesn't hold water. Otherwise no punishment is possible in college.
It's the retroactive part. They changed the rules halfway through. That should have been the school's top -- maybe only -- argument from the beginning.
This is the greatest injustice that has been visited upon on us and needs to be shouted to the heavens.
We might feel this way, but how else can you punish college programs? Using this argument costs us a ton of credibility and makes us sound like whiners, which severely undermines what should be the only point of contention, above.
The way they ALREADY punished the program: restricting the team's recruiting/scholarships. That punishes the coach and program, not the students on the team.
I almost choked when I saw the line in that article about the APR FROM FOUR YEARS AGO being responsible for this team being ineligible. That is disgusting. I knew it, but to see it in print like that just drove it home.
If there is some change in policy such that other high-profile schools avoid a postseason ban for the exact same infraction we had, then we have to start believing every anti-UConn conspiracy theory out there.What's sad is that a lot of people still don't know. Most fans are casual fans. My dentist is a St. John's alum, and when I had my teeth done we were talking about the season. He commented, "aren't they banned for recruiting violations?" When I explained the situation, he was offended and upset--and he doesn't like UConn.
What will annoy me is that everyone will figure out this is a sham, and UConn will be the only school so punished. Not that I want other schools punished necessarily (no good in rooting for injustices), but it would just frustrate me to high heaven when all of a sudden people realize it's bad right before UNC or UK is banned.