NBA Rules

[BoatShow]

You can make the argument it's unfair to a team to have go the whole length of the court with, lets say under 3 seconds to go. If a team scores with a couple seconds left it effectively ends the game prematurely. It's a horrible argument but hey, you can make it.

 

[Gurleyman]

Lamb also traveled on his breakaway dunk against SD State (after his steal and hit ahead to Napier, who gave it back to him). Officials ignored it. Thankfully.

 

[HuskiesAllDay]

only on the boneyard could a game like that that had everyone buzzing result in a "the NBA sucks" thread

No idiot. It's a "that rule sucks" thread. Which it does. The game was great. The rule is idiotic.

 

[whaler11]

The stupid rules pre exist anyone making money on commercials. So let's not pretend that's the reason.

 

[HuskiesAllDay]

The advancing rule makes the end of games more exciting and prevents the game from dragging out.

It prevents fouling in the back court which is a positive. You can't send someone to the line as easily to prevent the other team from shooting a 3. You can still do this once the ball is advanced, but its harder.

I'd prefer a more exciting end-of-game scenario.

Comparing it to football makes you sound like an idiot. It takes 3 seconds to advance the ball to the other half if there's a clean inbound pass.


You sound like another anti-heat or anti-Lebron cry baby by complaining about a rule NOW that has been in effect for as long as I remember the NBA.

No genius. In both scenarios the ball is advanced with no time passing simply by calling a timeout. I am not "crying" because the Heat won. I have said it for years that the rule is idiotic and I am simply restating that. There is no other call like it in any sport. If you call a timeout at any other time, then you don't advance the ball. So please enlighten me since you are so wise and give me one good basketball related argument as to why it makes sense.

 

[UChusky916]

No genius. In both scenarios the ball is advanced with no time passing simply by calling a timeout. I am not "crying" because the Heat won. I have said it for years that the rule is idiotic and I am simply restating that. There is no other call like it in any sport. If you call a timeout at any other time, then you don't advance the ball. So please enlighten me since you are so wise and give me one good basketball related argument as to why it makes sense.

As I said in my other post, it provides a more exciting end-of-game scenario. The long NBA season gets boring. The advancing rule provides more drama and buzzer-beaters are anything but boring.

Whether it makes sense or not doesn't matter.

 

[JaYnYcE]

Sports is theater and the rule creates drama. NBA is still the superior product to college at the end of the day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[tentoes4rings]

In my opini

 

[sammydabiz]

Sports is theater and the rule creates drama. NBA is still the superior product to college at the end of the day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Couldn't disagree more with you.......I can hardly watch the NBA (besides the playoffs) conversely, I could watch college any time......the college game is way better as a spectator than NBA ......anyday of the week

 

[JaYnYcE]

Couldn't disagree more with you.......I can hardly watch the NBA (besides the playoffs) conversely, I could watch college any time......the college game is way better as a spectator than NBA ......anyday of the week

Only time I can watch college basketball is when UCONN plays. I can skip all the blown layups and average at best overall talent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[sammydabiz]

Only time I can watch college basketball is when UCONN plays. I can skip all the blown layups and average at best overall talent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ya I hear ya,
The only time I can watch the NBA is during the 4th quarter of a playoff game. I can skip the free lanes to the rim, the over abundance of rules, and general tediousness of the NBA

 

[Scoe]

Ya I hear ya,
The only time I can watch the NBA is during the 4th quarter of a playoff game. I can skip the free lanes to the rim, the over abundance of rules, and general tediousness of the NBA

The one thing I dont like is the pace of the NBA games near the end, I get teams need to call timeouts and officials need to review plays to make sure they get the call right, but it shouldnt take 1-2 minutes to make a call and then another minute to hand the ball off to a player on an inbounds play. Jeff Vangundy was right on when he was mentioning how ridiculous it was for the officials to review an obvious play. The NHL does it right the officials just make the call and then boom play on.