- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,381
- Reaction Score
- 23,714
Heard a good point on Lowe post podcast with Doris Burke. Why does the fact that KD and LeBron are so talented allow us all to opine on where they go? If they were less talented we'd be fine with any free agency choice. Its simply not within a fans right to impose an obligation based on someone else's talent.
As a Celtics fan I don't want LeBron to come to Boston, they have to give up Kyrie in my opinion and at least partially abandon the system they've put in place. Maybe its worth if for the 3-ish titles he might bring and the entertainment of watching him - but simply aesthetically I'm interested in something different. I'm against Philly for similar 'fit' reasons (its not spacing, its usage rate AND stifling growth of their stars skillsets) and I think the recent GM crap show will not help.
I'm in favor of either staying in Cleveland (more and more doubtful given workload), LA or Houston in around that order. Even though Houston would mess with Celtics title chances I don't think LeBron + Harden + CP3 will last long enough to be an insurmountable barrier to Boston's future title chances.
Either way, fans are wrong to place blame, burden and expectation for how someone else chooses to employ their talents. The talent does not belong to us.
Are we accomplishing anything with self-evident comments of that nature, though? Does anybody think the talent belongs to them?
"Man, KD is the worst for leaving."
"Now let me tell you something about America and what liberty means. Our ancestors fought tooth and nail for his right to make that choice!"
"I'm going to talk to somebody else."