Mullins Projected Draft Projection | Page 6 | The Boneyard

Mullins Projected Draft Projection

Without a doubt. Ball was one of the guys last year who went to Hurley and said he wanted back after they lost to UF, while UK was coming to him with a bag. If nothing else, Hurley is a loyalist.

I'm also not sure anyone is going to pay up for a 30% shooter from three like Uconn will for him. His highest market value is likely with UConn.

The remarks from DP interview were interesting though. Who knows with the portal.
The interview was extremely interesting. I have my thoughts but I don’t feel like a night of back and forth. I do expect more changes than maybe expected. I also strongly feel Solo is one of the kids most likely to come back. I hope he does.
 
Have you looked at a 2027 mock or registered exactly how much weaker that draft is? Do you think Reed Sheppard or Zachary Risacher are a better prospect than Mullins? Draft quality is a big deal. The fall off from a historically amazing draft and a unbelievably weak draft is steep. In theory, he could go from 25 to 7-8.

If Mullins was hurt for much of the year, has a chance to mature, we really don't know what his potential can be next year. I'm honestly not sure a kid like Mullins has that much better a chance at a second deal in theory than a guy like Tarris. Tarris is pretty niche. We've all used the Hawkins comparison - if you get to the league as a shooter and don't make shots, you're kinda done. He was anything but a sharpshooter this year - we saw multiple balls missing the rim entirely. A big like Tarris is a bit more predictable in how he'll be used. Speaking of which, really love seeing Tarris mocked late first on some of these.
I have. And I haven’t seen Mullins projected any higher than he is now. So all these hypotheticals you are spewing are pure nonsense and noise imo.
 
Dan Hurley has now gone on Dan Patrick & Jim Rome making it sound like he thinks Braylon “should” come back if he’s not a super high pick. Sure seems like he’s making the push for him to return.
 
I have. And I haven’t seen Mullins projected any higher than he is now. So all these hypotheticals you are spewing are pure nonsense and noise imo.
Mullins isn't being projected in the 2027's because he's expected to go now up till now. The top of next year's draft will, as always, be made up of the 2026 freshmen class - which isn't great. Mullins would have easily been a top 6-7 player in it.
 
Mullins isn't being projected in the 2027's because he's expected to go now up till now. The top of next year's draft will, as always, be made up of the 2026 freshmen class - which isn't great. Mullins would have easily been a top 6-7 player in it.
Let’s just see. We will never agree on this. Time to move on. I am constantly refreshing Twitter hoping to hear about Luke’s replacement. Let’s start there.
 
.-.
Hurley told Patrick that a kid like Mullins could.
make more money staying in college than going late in the first round that’s crazy . But A big determining factor is how much a kid likes school . Which has restrictions like classes but has perks also like that environment provides structure that immature kids still need.
In the NBA you’re on your own for better or worse
 
Any mocks I've seen for 2027 don't even have Stokes 1. They often have Cameron Williams 1. There is a ton of euros in there, which are usually space fillers when not enough good Americans. If the upcoming draft is an A+, the quality of 2027 based on what I've seen is a D. Cameron Williams isn't a special player by any means based on what I've seen, nor is Jordan Smith. This thing has Reibe 15.


Mullins could feasibly go top 5 if he crushes it, that draft is that weak. Some of it will be based on who decides not to go this year obviously.
It’s what I said earlier, if Braylon returns and develops as expected he should absolutely be a top 10 pick in next years draft.
 
Right now he goes mid 25 or so.

With minimal slight improvements in next year's weak draft he probably goes 25-40.

With normal expectation improvements 10-15.

And if he knocks it out of the park he's a top 10 pick. Adding muscle, improvement on D. 40%+ from 3. Improving an already efficient 2 point game.
 
Once Solo's wrist heals I see no reason why he can't get back to being close to a 40% shooter from 3, and if that's the case, he will be our leading scorer next season.
I’m not about trashing solo but people really need to get a handle on what type of player he really is. If he’s our leading scorer and go to next yr we are a 15-15 type of team. It’s not who he is. Stop overrating his talent. If he’s healthy he’d be a very good 3 option on a championship level team
 
Without a doubt. Ball was one of the guys last year who went to Hurley and said he wanted back after they lost to UF, while UK was coming to him with a bag. If nothing else, Hurley is a loyalist.

I'm also not sure anyone is going to pay up for a 30% shooter from three like Uconn will for him. His highest market value is likely with UConn.

The remarks from DP interview were interesting though. Who knows with the portal.
It’s not about money with solo it’s about minutes if Mullins comes back with two shooting guards coming in. One of them most likely a starter. I always thought of solo closer to a Rashad Anderson type of player, is he willing to come off the bench senior yr? Or have minutes cut into?
 
.-.
I’m not about trashing solo but people really need to get a handle on what type of player he really is. If he’s our leading scorer and go to next yr we are a 15-15 type of team. It’s not who he is. Stop overrating his talent. If he’s healthy he’d be a very good 3 option on a championship level team
I say this with the assumption that Mullins won't be back, in which case who else is scoring for us? You honestly think we'll bring in 2 guys through the portal who will be our top 2 leading scorers and Solo can be the 3rd option? I don't. This is why I think it's so important for our success next season to have Mullins back because then you're not trying to replace the production of 3 starters.
 
Call me crazy but I think if Mullins stays with the two kids coming in next yr I think Ball may be squeezed out.
I said this in another thread, but they can't be on the court at the same time very often. Mullins is a shooting guard. He's not big enough or physical enough to be a 3 in our defensive system. His emergence as a passer late in the year is exactly what we do need from a SG and don't get from Solo. His defense is also vastly better as is his rebounding. If Ball is back, he should be in the John Gwynn role off the bench. I don't think Dan can afford his usual loyalty in that situation.
 
Braylon’s ceiling is several magnitudes above Liam’s. Liam has physical/athleticism limitations that Braylon does not. His absolute worst case scenario is dropping to 20th. Best case is 8th.

I don’t understand the negativity towards the G league. Players develop better in the G league playing against other pros than they would playing against DePaul in December.
He will be 22 nd or worse, so many dudes in this draft class…next year with an extra 10 to 15 lbs and a 40 %% from 3 averaging over 15 per game with a potential natty he is top 10, kinda like what Clingan did
 
I said this in another thread, but they can't be on the court at the same time very often. Mullins is a shooting guard. He's not big enough or physical enough to be a 3 in our defensive system. His emergence as a passer late in the year is exactly what we do need from a SG and don't get from Solo. His defense is also vastly better as is his rebounding. If Ball is back, he should be in the John Gwynn role off the bench. I don't think Dan can afford his usual loyalty in that situation.

I think many of us agree with that but I doubt Ball gets demoted after 3 years given his stature in the program. Have always thought Ball is the kind of player you have to make a lot of workarounds for to make a roster work.
 
I say this with the assumption that Mullins won't be back, in which case who else is scoring for us? You honestly think we'll bring in 2 guys through the portal who will be our top 2 leading scorers and Solo can be the 3rd option? I don't. This is why I think it's so important for our success next season to have Mullins back because then you're not trying to replace the production of 3 starters.
Well if we bring in a Donnie freeman and possibly a banger down low and or Reibe taking a sophomore step up then I pray that in your scenario solo is still our 3rd leading scorer or it’ll be a down yr. Sure he can be the guy here but it won’t be a very good team if that’s the case. As of right now, I’d say Mullins stays by the way. And PS - this is just me, I think landrew will be a beast the minute he steps on campus. Has that Caron butler feel to him. I do think Danny will hold him back a bit in the sense he won’t give him the keys like Calhoun did with butler but I do think that kid is going to be special
 
I said this in another thread, but they can't be on the court at the same time very often. Mullins is a shooting guard. He's not big enough or physical enough to be a 3 in our defensive system. His emergence as a passer late in the year is exactly what we do need from a SG and don't get from Solo. His defense is also vastly better as is his rebounding. If Ball is back, he should be in the John Gwynn role off the bench. I don't think Dan can afford his usual loyalty in that situation.
I’ve been saying I think he’s a Rashad Anderson. His defense is too shaky to be a starter and his shooting too erratic. When he’s hot ride him. Doesn’t matter if he’s a starter or not, but when he’s off his defensive inefficiencies mean he’s a 6th man type of guy. Hard in this day and age a college sports to keep guys in that type of roll tho.
 
.-.
I think many of us agree with that but I doubt Ball gets demoted after 3 years given his stature in the program. Have always thought Ball is the kind of player you have to make a lot of workarounds for to make a roster work.
He's been a starter for two years and among our leading scorers and, by the way, we've won nearly 60 games over those two years.

I'm well aware of the numbers, there's no need to rehash them.

I'm talking about how his coach, who we seem to trust implicitly, has that same level of trust in Solo. If he didn't, he wouldn't have played nearly the minutes he has, about 30 per game.

To everyone making this line of argument, that Solo needs to be squeezed out next year: How do you account for this year? For last year? He's been a huge cog for us, and we took the last two national champions to the final minute in each year.

Hurley is loyal, but not stupid. He wants to win, and he's good at it. There is no chance he would have played Solo all those minutes the past two years if he didn't think he was a big part of all that winning.

And half the board wants to toss him aside.
 
He's been a starter for two years and among our leading scorers and, by the way, we've won nearly 60 games over those two years.

I'm well aware of the numbers, there's no need to rehash them.

I'm talking about how his coach, who we seem to trust implicitly, has that same level of trust in Solo. If he didn't, he wouldn't have played nearly the minutes he has, about 30 per game.

To everyone making this line of argument, that Solo needs to be squeezed out next year: How do you account for this year? For last year? He's been a huge cog for us, and we took the last two national champions to the final minute in each year.

Hurley is loyal, but not stupid. He wants to win, and he's good at it. There is no chance he would have played Solo all those minutes the past two years if he didn't think he was a big part of all that winning.

And half the board wants to toss him aside.
The talent level is the argument. He was on this roster that could take minutes away from him the last two yrs? Next yr is different.
 
The talent level is the argument. He was on this roster that could take minutes away from him the last two yrs? Next yr is different.
You're going to have to explain that. We were talented enough to win a whole lot of games both years. He started and was a key player on a Final Four team, even with his shooting woes.
Again, Hurley trusts him.
 
He's been a starter for two years and among our leading scorers and, by the way, we've won nearly 60 games over those two years.

I'm well aware of the numbers, there's no need to rehash them.

I'm talking about how his coach, who we seem to trust implicitly, has that same level of trust in Solo. If he didn't, he wouldn't have played nearly the minutes he has, about 30 per game.

To everyone making this line of argument, that Solo needs to be squeezed out next year: How do you account for this year? For last year? He's been a huge cog for us, and we took the last two national champions to the final minute in each year.

Hurley is loyal, but not stupid. He wants to win, and he's good at it. There is no chance he would have played Solo all those minutes the past two years if he didn't think he was a big part of all that winning.

And half the board wants to toss him aside.
Ball brings an intangible to the starting 5 you don't measure in basketball play. Consistency, system, loyalty, trust, things you can't measure in the stat line. This is probably something coaches value more than fans.

If you look at him purely for basketball play, yes, you can make a significant upgrade. His defense has been discussed, he easily leads the team in WTF moments and his offensive game is fairly limited.

He's far more valuable to UConn than he is to any other program.
 
Dan Hurley has now gone on Dan Patrick & Jim Rome making it sound like he thinks Braylon “should” come back if he’s not a super high pick. Sure seems like he’s making the push for him to return.
Yeah this tells me that there’s definitely a decision to be made that he and his family haven’t made yet
 
You're going to have to explain that. We were talented enough to win a whole lot of games both years. He started and was a key player on a Final Four team, even with his shooting woes.
Again, Hurley trusts him.
Last yr we weren’t very good. This yr who was going to take minutes away from him? Ross? Well he actually did towards the end of the season. Now you have Mullins staying and two freshmen incoming with Ross staying. Landrew is going to play! Whose minutes is he taking? Not Mullins. And let’s not forget furphy might still be around.
 
.-.
Last yr we weren’t very good. This yr who was going to take minutes away from him? Ross? Well he actually did towards the end of the season. Now you have Mullins staying and two freshmen incoming with Ross staying. Landrew is going to play! Whose minutes is he taking? Not Mullins. And let’s not forget furphy might still be around.
Too many assumptions. If there is one player I know will be back, it's Ball.
 
Yeah this tells me that there’s definitely a decision to be made that he and his family haven’t made yet
I think Dan is making it very clear without saying it directly. He doesn't want Braylin to make the same mistake Liam made.

His body and game are just not NBA ready.
 
his poor shooting this year really didn't look good, and it's physicality related. if he's thrown into the league it'll be a bit tough, have to make a plan with long term career development in mind not short term cashing out
 
Too many assumptions. If there is one player I know will be back, it's Ball.
What’s the assumption? My take is I don’t think he will be back if Mullins stays. Is that what we are arguing about? Because if your position is Mullins leaves then I am in agreement with you, solo stays.
 
c
I think Dan is making it very clear without saying it directly. He doesn't want Braylin to make the same mistake Liam made.

His body and game are just not NBA ready.
It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. If the NBA is valuing him highly, it's not based on results. It's 100% based on projection, which seems a tricky spot to be in when you have so many more proven players in this pool. Seems like a risky move unless I'm a GM at the end of round 1.
 
What’s the assumption? My take is I don’t think he will be back if Mullins stays. Is that what we are arguing about? Because if your position is Mullins leaves then I am in agreement with you, solo stays.
You have no idea who is coming or going yet.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,363
Messages
4,567,874
Members
10,471
Latest member
EO2004


Top Bottom