He's been a starter for two years and among our leading scorers and, by the way, we've won nearly 60 games over those two years.
I'm well aware of the numbers, there's no need to rehash them.
I'm talking about how his coach, who we seem to trust implicitly, has that same level of trust in Solo. If he didn't, he wouldn't have played nearly the minutes he has, about 30 per game.
To everyone making this line of argument, that Solo needs to be squeezed out next year: How do you account for this year? For last year? He's been a huge cog for us, and we took the last two national champions to the final minute in each year.
Hurley is loyal, but not stupid. He wants to win, and he's good at it. There is no chance he would have played Solo all those minutes the past two years if he didn't think he was a big part of all that winning.
And half the board wants to toss him aside.