Kind of silly to take one item out of a chain of events, and say "well let's just look at this separately." By that will logic a poacher who illegally shoots a deer can say "well, I just found it dead in the woods."
The facts aren't in dispute here. ESPN funded the raid of the big east to lower its overall cost to acquire games at a lower cost to the network. It then offered a lowball offer to the conference. When the conference refused that offer it financed further raids to destroy the big east.
With the benefit of hindsight, the conference should have taken the offer, in much the same way that, the victim, whose store is burned down by thugs should have with the benefit of hindsight, paid them protection money. That doesn't justify ESPN's actions anymore than it justifies the anrsonists actions. Criminal is criminal. Wrong is wrong.
Now, if I'm the ACC, I would be very nervous right now. Having gotten away with this in the past, ESPN is very likely to go back to this playbook again.
(Oh, and here's a pro tip, if you are replying to my post, you might want to use the reply function. That way, I'll see your response. Unless, of course, you didn't want me to. 😏)