- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,798
- Reaction Score
- 10,140
Good comeback.We have no idea what Mora is upset about, but tampering with the outcome of a game is a crime. Aren't you a lawyer?
Good comeback.We have no idea what Mora is upset about, but tampering with the outcome of a game is a crime. Aren't you a lawyer?
Not a lawyer but I’d be somewhat surprised if the statutes covering match fixing didn’t require some intent to impact the outcome of the game. A third party school tampering with a player and telling them not to play in a bowl game does not care about the outcome of the Fenway bowl. Presumably their hope would be to get them to transfer sooner or reduce the risk of injury if they’ve already committed. You’re taking quite a strong position, should at least have some basis in a statute you can quote.I was not aware you had performed a forensic analysis of all the contacts between other schools and our players. Thank you for that.
The situation I laid out in my post is very much a crime, and I stand by my assertion that it is a virtual certainty that this has already happened, somewhere in college football.
Hot damn! We have a good coach who is also an honorable person!!!I'm 100% against grown men cheating the rules and teaching players horrible life lessons.
You chose a different body part than I was thinking of.NCAA is the most toothless entity in the world
Recruiting a player to your team is not match fixing.If a school or schools contacted players before a game and asked them to impact the outcome of that game by either not playing or not giving 100%, there is quite a bit UConn can do, including reporting the offending programs to the FBI and state law enforcement. I am certain this has happened already several times. I suspect that no one wants to make a big deal about it because so many programs are "cheating" this way, but fixing a sports event is a crime in many states, and I don't think gambling has to be involved.
Recruiting a player to your team is not match fixing.
Not a lawyer but I’d be somewhat surprised if the statutes covering match fixing didn’t require some intent to impact the outcome of the game. A third party school tampering with a player and telling them not to play in a bowl game does not care about the outcome of the Fenway bowl. Presumably their hope would be to get them to transfer sooner or reduce the risk of injury if they’ve already committed. You’re taking quite a strong position, should at least have some basis in a statute you can quote.
I hope you didn't go to UConn because your reading comprehension is terrible and you are a third rate troll.
sadly this is true. Better to isolate the best case. In the end, its going to be on UConn's lawyers and not UConn's football coach to establish what's going onHate to say it, last time we sued someone over conference realignment, it went poorly for us. Not exactly the same, but you are messing with the “Club”
With Coach on this, just hope it ends well.
When he’s having a day like this no purpose in engaging with him. He just drags the debate down to a moronic level and then tries to win with experience.I just reread your post. You are implying exactly that. Sincerely, Dr. "Patman". UConn PhD 2009.
edit: should I not take your posts at face value and instead opt for tortured logic of half statements and hidden gaps?
and I take bait easily... latent italian in meWhen he’s having a day like this no purpose in engaging with him. He just drags the debate down to a moronic level and then tries to win with experience.
No, it can'tCould Jim Mora just be threatening rather than UConn ready to file a court case. The threat may be able to control the situation.
Latent and Italian don't belong in the same sentence, paesano mio!and I take bait easily... latent italian in me
Yeah- I was thinking "gutless" as well...You chose a different body part than I was thinking of.