A couple of false straw men here: 1) "Test her against a tougher opponent" yet she failed the test against a lesser opponent. Not a very good way to inspire confidence.
2) "Development more important than early season win" If win not than important let's find a test/game we know she can pass. How did she play against St. Johns?
Not straw men, simply statements.
1) This thread is about her play. Okay, why not test her play against a better opponent to see if she can be a reliable bench player? If not, then we’ll stick with the starters forever.
2) Wins are important to get you into the tournament, but UConn should win the majority of its games and win the AAC championship so enough about regular season OOC wins-losses. I would’ve played her even in the St. John’s game and if we lost because she sucked and it was all her fault, great. Then never play her again.
Practice does not imitate real game situations. Practice alone cannot allow someone to gain experience. If she’s making mistakes in practice then I get not trusting her, but obviously he saw something in her when he recruited her and relegating her to the bench hasn’t helped her improve, so why not try something different?