I gotta ask - do you ever look up any, you know, facts before you post this stuff? Vandy beat Tennessee twice as well as #19 Alabama, hardly the work of a mediocre team. And Blakes shot 548 shots, exactly as many as her teammate Khamil Pierre, and Pierre played fewer minutes.Playing for UConn can hurt you on the individual awards. Sarah didn't play complete games pretty much every night, at least in her minutes played. She didn't shoot 15-18 times a game and she plays with the most talented roster in the country. The winner played on a mediocre team that allowed her to shoot as much as needed and like many said really didn't result in big wins.
For those that don't think Sarah cares I would strongly disagree. I think you will see in her play on Monday that she has a statement to make and I for one am looking forward to it.
I have to revise my post. Even though I believe that the network had multiple stories about Blakes after her scoring sprees, during the UConn tournament broadcasts, the announcers mentioned multiple times that Sarah was the "likely" national freshman of the year. I wonder if it will be mentioned tonight???? I sorta doubt it.Just another example of writers voting based on headlines (from a certain network???) and not based upon season long "playing" and game stats.
Maybe they should look at the player's season complete box score and not just one column. ufb.
Would NOT trade Sarah for anything !!!!
Huh?....ohhh I get it....sarcasmWell, one thing, they were in the same situation at the end of a game and Blakes succeeded where Sarah failed. Both were fouled shooting a three-point shot at the end of a game. Blakes hit all three of her shots, Sarah did not. That is what made the difference.![]()
Bingo!!!! Statement made and deliveredPlaying for UConn can hurt you on the individual awards. Sarah didn't play complete games pretty much every night, at least in her minutes played. She didn't shoot 15-18 times a game and she plays with the most talented roster in the country. The winner played on a mediocre team that allowed her to shoot as much as needed and like many said really didn't result in big wins.
For those that don't think Sarah cares I would strongly disagree. I think you will see in her play on Monday that she has a statement to make and I for one am looking forward to it.
I am in the group that believes that there will be a " split vote" on FPOY.I gotta ask - do you ever look up any, you know, facts before you post this stuff? Vandy beat Tennessee twice as well as #19 Alabama, hardly the work of a mediocre team. And Blakes shot 548 shots, exactly as many as her teammate Khamil Pierre, and Pierre played fewer minutes.
Blakes is a terrific player and is certainly first team All Freshman Team, if there is such a thing, but @Vowelguy is correct, the big numbers are eye-catching and sadly maybe the key criterion
View attachment 108278
If I recall correctly, I believe Shea Ralph coached her Vanderbilt Team in the NCAA last year. They won the play-in game against Columbia, 72-68, and lost to Baylor in the first round, 63-80.Sarah is probably happy for her. Blakes carried the Vandy team to their first NCAA in years and she had no AA to lean on. I would rather have Sarah, but you cannot deny what Blakes did was phenomenal.
Complex issue, not unlike the neverending debate around what exactly constitues the "MVP" (literal vs. figurative, team record vs. indivudal performance). "Freshman of the Year" is even more nebulous. What constitutes? Metrics / stats can be tweaked to support whatever interest. I.e. Make the conclusion, choose the stats to match.What good are gaudy numbers when they don’t translate to wins? Not arguing with you, vg, just pointing out a dumb obsession with equating “lots of points” with “great basketball “