Michelle Voepel reprising the bad for basketball argument | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Michelle Voepel reprising the bad for basketball argument

The level that Michelle will go to to be relevant and noticed is just outrageous. Just as an example this is her family car.
1617302971718.png
 
Sitting here thoroughly enjoying opening day at the Stadium. My Yankees currently up 2-1 over the Jays in the bottom of the 3rd.......Just sayin.
Kraken kracks one!! (Will be so good to see the Yankees being bad for baseball this year!)
 
The level that Michelle will go to to be relevant and noticed is just outrageous. Just as an example this is her family car.View attachment 66528
Thank God I had finished my coffee before seeing this. I don't think my screen could take another spew of it this morning after the reading of connie's post.:eek:
 
Sitting here thoroughly enjoying opening day at the Stadium. My Yankees currently up 2-1 over the Jays in the bottom of the 3rd.......Just sayin.
One of the most entertaining things there is: sit in a room and listen to the banter between Yankees and Sox fans. As long as it stays at banter.....
 
Poor Ms. Voepel. She may be a good person. I would not know for I don’t know her personally. I know her only by what she writes, says and opines. She wrote So. Carolina should have won, another way of saying Uconn should have lost. She picked Baylor to win or Uconn to lose. Someone said she now picks Stanford to win. She asked Geno about the non-call at the post-game press conference making it an issue. What has the Uconn done to deserve the surrounding controversy. It is the officials who didn’t make a call for whatever reasons. Some say Bayor was robbed of a win as if Uconn shouldn’t have won. I must admit that as a Uconn fan I have a bias in favor of Uconn. In my opinion, Ms. Voepel has anti-Uconn bias in her opinions, statements, writing. How subtle it might have been, she has shown her bias whenever possible. She is entitled to her opinion as a person, but I wish she were more objective as a sports writer in public domain. Just my 2 cents.
 
.-.
I’m not a big fan of paraphrases. I say if you can’t make your point in a single phrase, don’t say it.
I was going to agree with you and then I saw what you did. ;) I still agree, no more paraphrasing for me.
 
Jeeez, are we really the WCBB equivalent to the Damn Yankees. Does that make me the equivalent of a Yankees fan.
Oh, God what a horrible thought.
I need a whiskey, make that a quart of Knob Creek.
Started to pop for a bottle of that maybe a week ago. Not sure if I've ever had it. Went with Elijah Craig small batch instead. Sublime.

Let me know what you think of KC, if you would.
 
I know we often say NC or bust at Connecticut, but for many programs just reaching the final four is an incredible achievement. Think about how for the last 13 seasons, or 14 years, no team in Connecticut’s bracket has broken through. That’s since 2008, or when Tennessee last won a NC!!! We have continued to be at this bad for basketball level for a long time. Now it seems we are poised to once again be really bad for basketball. With the team we have next year, it should be another final four at minimum. And 3 years of Fudd and Bueckers should keep the ball rolling.
This might be an understatement, I'm excited about the size they have coming in over the next 2 recruiting classes to join forces with Aaliyah Edwards
 
.-.
Well, maybe a little bit of a hot take on my part... I'll admit that "shouldn't happen again" is not exactly "should end". Still, I think Michelle has made it clear that she's had enough U
Voepel: It matters a ton, for all the reasons Charlie said. This is a meeting of two very different generations of coaches who are both successful. No one has accomplished more than Geno Auriemma's 11 NCAA titles. It's hard to imagine we'll ever see another program replicate this, and for the growth of the sport, it's probably best if that's the case.

I can't figure out how the OP twisted this into "Paraphrased - "UConn in it's 13th straight f4. Better for WCBB to end that streak.""
'
Regardless what the OP intended Michelle's take is foolish beyond words. UConn dominance has been one of main contributors of the growth of the sport. When does excellence become passé'?
The last I looked they were beaten in the FF their last two trips because other programs have taken the challenge and tried to compete to their level. If you don't have a UConn or Tenn back in the day what are you aspiring to?
 
Thank God I had finished my coffee before seeing this. I don't think my screen could take another spew of it this morning after the reading of connie's post.:eek:
True, Connie DID pull off the upset!!
 
Yawn... Was Tiger Woods bad for golf? Serena Williams bad for tennis? New York Yankees, Montreal Canadiens, Boston Celtics, Green Bay Packers, Chicago Bulls, LA Lakers, New England Patriots, New York Islanders, Edmonton Oilers, ...

As great as Connecticut is, and has been for most of 25+ years, they're not a new phenomenon in sports, and no other sport has ever been ruined by a dominant player or team.
 
In the history of spectator sports it's been the dominant teams that have grown the sport. I think Michele confuses popularity with competition. She sees building the sport as having more successful programs around the country. But pro basketball took off in the Jordan era when there really wasn't anyone to challenge them. Would pro football be better without the NE Patriots all these years? Or the Cowboys of the 70's? Baseball regained it's popularity during the 90's when the Yankees dominated?

I had to laugh after ESPN's Twitter page was inundated with howls about one bad call the other night. It answered a question. I always wondered what happened to all the UConn trolls who lived on the old ESPN wcbb message board. Now I know, they moved to Twitter. Don't think for one second that ESPN wasn't thinking about them when they hyped that non-call while ignoring all the other non-calls that happened throughout the game. They are pandering to a large block of fans who want UConn to lose more than they want any other team to win.

I'm sure that Voepel, Creme, Hayes et al truly want to build wcbb from the inside but their employer (Disney/Hearst) only wants more viewers watching and if it's hatred for UConn that gets them to watch then D/H is OK with that.
Just wanted to point out that the NBA actually 'took off' a few years prior to the Jordan era. Rather than during a time of no competition, it actually was a period of intense competition featuring the rivalry of Magic/Bird, Lakers/Celtics that has most often been credited with the skyrocketing popularity of the NBA. Having said that, as a UCONN wcbb fan I love watching my team win every game, but can see the advantage, to the growth of the game beyond UCONN nation, of some legitimate rivalries. It's good to have a worthy opponent just fall short of beating us every year!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,510
Messages
4,579,538
Members
10,489
Latest member
Djw06001


Top Bottom