- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 63
- Reaction Score
- 50
I wish!! They were actually 4-16 from 3.
Seven players took the 16 shots, and each player missed at least one shot!
I wish!! They were actually 4-16 from 3.
I hate the superstar treatment myself but it's a fact of life, unfortunately. I made the the "my girls" crack because an elbow to the gut isn't all that heinous, it happens. It's elbows to the head and face that are the worst.
how unsportsmanlike DT is
She acts like all the guys ... you know, the ones with the huge contracts and vast followings. Get over it.
It's funny that Suns fans want to blame the officiating, or "star treatment" for getting beat. How about holding onto a 17-point lead? How about making some of those 9 missed free throws, or shooting better than 25% on those 16 3-point shots? The refs didn't set picks for Mitchell, Taurasi and Curry to get open for those 3-pointers right in a row at the end of the game. To me it looked like superior ball movement got them open, and then clutch execution on the shots. Maybe it's just me, but it seemed like it was the players who decided the game, not the refs.
The "star treatment" I remember Griner getting was being triple-teamed with the ball, getting grabbed and hit while the TV announcers are saying she has the right to her space and it should be a foul on the Suns. Griner holds the ball high to protect it and tries to twist out of the triple team, and the Suns players flop and act like they've been Barncastled, and the refs call an offensive foul on Griner. Then they review it for a possible flagrant, and the replays clearly show it shouldn't have even been a common offensive foul.
First of all, no. "All the guys" don't act like that. Are you suggesting that verbally abusing game officials over calls enhances the marketability of the player or the prestige of the league?
Yup. The same hypocritical league that lets one of these teams play in a freakin' casino (which the young girls don't know about??), and the other team plays in an arena named after a casino, and wears the name of the casino on the fronts of their jerseys. The NBA got over the role modeling thing 20 years ago. See Charles Barkley:David saved me a lot of typing.
My bottom line is that there's a rule book. It says what it says for a reason, I assume. Enforce it or change it. Don't have it apply to some but not others. These rules I cited were blatantly disregarded by Taurasi and others. In no way is this a gray area.
Does a league that talks a lot about role modeling for young girls see Taurasi's behavior as supportive of that goal?
Lisa Borders has to decide what kind of league she wants. If profanity-laced tirades against the game officials is an image she supports, change or delete the rule and own the decision.
I hate the superstar treatment myself but it's a fact of life, unfortunately. I made the the "my girls" crack because an elbow to the gut isn't all that heinous, it happens. It's elbows to the head and face that are the worst.
Yup. The same hypocritical league that lets one of these teams play in a freakin' casino (which the young girls don't know about??), and the other team plays in an arena named after a casino, and wears the name of the casino on the fronts of their jerseys. The NBA got over the role modeling thing 20 years ago. See Charles Barkley:
My point is, if the league really gave a hoot about being role models, then why would they play in a casino?This is an absurd turn in the discussion. "freaking casino"... geez. So you support a player being able to unleash a barrage of public profanity and disparagement on game officials in blatant disregard of the rules of the game, but are troubled somehow that games are played at the Mohegan Sun Arena because... ?
Nevermind, I'm out.
How come no one ever complained about this when she played for UConn?My dad and I watched both games today, and he commented on how unsportsmanlike DT is. She's arguably the Goat of WBB but for that reason I prefer Maya Moore.
Is gambling bad? I don't think so, when it is done responsibly. Shouting profanity at the authorities in the game, that's bad. Giving another player a cheap shot to get an advantage in a game, that's bad.My point is, if the league really gave a hoot about being role models, then why would they play in a casino?
We all know why - because they take what they can get. This owner has a business model that allows them to lose money on the team because it brings people into the casino to gamble. OK I'm fine with that. But is it really consistent with role models?? IMO can't have it both ways.
She was feisty and combative at UConn. She didn't hurl profanities or take cheap shots to the best of my knowledge. Because of her greatness, it seems, she has been allowed greater and greater latitude in her behavior and she has naturally taken it.How come no one ever complained about this when she played for UConn?