S
storrsbred1
They both just alluded to the possibility that there is much more to this story. May said this was the tip of the iceberg in his opinion.
Look online. You can find out what the rumors are of what else is involved. This is going to absolutely blow up! Simply unbelievable! You couldn't make this up in your wildest dreams with your most sinical hat on. I cannot believe that it has gone on this long without it being made public! Truly mind boggling!
The Sandusky pimped out thing was a rumor that Mark Madden a radio guy said on someones show today, many other sites have picked it up and ran with it. Who knows if it's true, wouldn't shock me at all. As for Ray Gricar, he was the District Attorney that was first investigating this case in 1998 and he set up a sting with Sandusky admitting to one of the kids mom's that he was doing stuff with her child. His disappearance came 7 years later but it does seem extremely strange that he never charged Sandusky. They found his car in a parking lot and his laptop in the river with the hard drive damaged but no sign of Gricar, he vanished off the face of the earth.
Man, I hope JoePa didn't keep this as quiet as possible because he had his own skeletons.
Look online. You can find out what the rumors are of what else is involved. This is going to absolutely blow up! Simply unbelievable! You couldn't make this up in your wildest dreams with your most sinical hat on. I cannot believe that it has gone on this long without it being made public! Truly mind boggling!
If that is how you think 'cynical' is spelled, it might be best for you to not post anymore.....or at least use spellcheck
You beat me to it...Posts criticizing someone's spelling or grammar are best saved for responding to mis-spellings in posts calling others stupid, or even better, pointing out grammar mistakes . . . . Doing it in any other context really makes you look like an @ss.
Excalibur, it is not like it was a typo.....just pointing out it is hard to take anyone seriously when they 'mis-spell' a word like cynical. It takes two seconds to look it up and I believe, spell check points out incorrectly spelled words. Look at how many people are spelling tonight's opponent as 'Colombia.' Are we playing an entire country? Why is it so hard to spell common words correctly?
Excalibur, it is not like it was a typo.....just pointing out it is hard to take anyone seriously when they 'mis-spell' a word like cynical. It takes two seconds to look it up and I believe, spell check points out incorrectly spelled words. Look at how many people are spelling tonight's opponent as 'Colombia.' Are we playing an entire country? Why is it so hard to spell common words correctly?
If that is how you think 'cynical' is spelled, it might be best for you to not post anymore.....or at least use spellcheck
What you are implying is pretty horrific. Unfortunately, it answers a lot of questions about this mess, so it has to be given credence.The original "justification" that Joe Paterno and people in power at PSU, did not turn in Sandusky because they were "protecting the PSU brand" made zero sense. If Sandusky was the problem, you removed him after turning him in, and looked like heroes.
That Sandusky was the head of a rotting fish, where it was in the interest of many for him to not be arrested makes more sense, as sick as it sounds.
Its all conjecture on my part, but as the information rolled out in pieces "the protecting the program/brand didn't make sense". It was easier for me to believe that Paterno thought he could "fix" his friend/colleague without him going to prison, because Paterno is old and stubborn. No one at PSU was going to tell Paterno any different it would seem, so the Paterno reported the incident to his AD thing is sort of irrelevant. As now it has been reported that Paterno never even spoke to Sandusky about the incident McQueary reported seeing, I can't believe that "fixing" Sandusky was the reason either. I would feel better to be wrong and to know that Sandusky acted alone, but it just doesn't add up. I guess we will know more when the investigation/trial happens, if Sandusky doesn't off himself in the meantime.What you are implying is pretty horrific. Unfortunately, it answers a lot of questions about this mess, so it has to be given credence.
Who knows all the details at this point, but my guess is that this situation is very much akin to the Catholic Church scandal where people were more concerned with protecting the institution and their own reputations, and "protecting the simpel faithful" (a common term in the Catholic church scandal, and one I think that gives the exact right perspective on how bishops and Paterno and Penn State viewed their followers). In fact, even their actions where similar...rather than turning Sandusky in they let him resign and "took away his keys."
Easiest way to do this was to push for Sandusky to be prosecuted after the 1998 incident, or at least push him as far away from the program as physically possible. These are smart and educated people they had to have known that. It makes me think people knew of Sandusky prior to 98, and only when it went on paper as far as a police investigation/prosecutor involvement did they push him "to retire". Again conjecture, but there are smoking guns in multiple spots in the timeline.