Free - the problem that I have with your line of reasoning is this, and I will probably get killed for saying it.
If I was the ACC I'm not sure I don't pick Louisville over UConn. The thought that it was our slot and it was stolen from us just doesn't ring true to me. I know that I'm not a student of the CR game and know all of the ins and outs of TV contracts and DMAs, but when this got done they were ahead.
APR, Calhoun leaving, football still not widely respected, all are factors.
In the long run I think we will prove to be the better program. But in the long run I also believe we end up in a power conference. Like I said, I don't follow the ins and outs of this like some of you do, but all of the key facts and figures about all of the candidates are public. We were both on a list. 1 and 1a. Some of the ACC schools wanted us. Some wanted LV. And some actively were against us if you believe what you read. Was anyone actively against LV? I've never heard as such.
Could Warde and Herbst have convinced FSU, Miami, BC and Clemson to change their minds? I have no idea. But it always seemed to be uphill with the ACC. I think that we were a bit deluded thinking this was a lay up.
I am not writing this to back up Free at all, but I'd point out that even Jurich said UConn was penned in.
This goes back to 2011 when UConn had the probation and APR issues too and it was surely a candidate to join. Remember, too, that Ville also had the same APR problems UConn had, so it's irrelevant.
But in 2011, the expansion started with UConn and Syracuse, then BC nixed it in committee.
Something really funky happened after. You had the UVa people (a mix of people with UConn and Notre Dame ties) come out in the media talking about an expanded ACC expansion. Some insiders on ACC message boards were reporting that ND and UConn were about to be added. It was in many newspapers. We began to talk about this on this board.
A week after that, the Blaudschun article interviewing Flipper appeared, and it confirmed what a couple insiders said on some boards (for instance, a Villanova poster on the Rutgers board laid out the same dang story about UConn being the initial choice and BC blocking them). While people focused on the BC-blocking-UConn angle, the ACC and the BE offices were focused on a poison pill in the story.
Flipper claimed that ESPN engineered everything. And, ESPN engineering the inclusion of UConn and the addition of ND might have made sense in a variety of ways. It would have gotten two big TV draws onto ESPN's permanent ACC platter. Such an expanded expansion would have also overridden any of BC's blocks.
After the article came out, Flipper was called to the principal's office and read the riot act. Pitt, Syracuse, the ACC offices, and especially ESPN were incensed. The BE offices were no doubt mighty interested in what the Flipper had to say. The same insiders reporting info before were saying that Flipper had essentially killed ACC expansion for a future year for fear that ESPN's involvement would come up in legal action. ND as well was probably driving a harder bargain at the time since joining the ACC meant giving up traditional football games in the midwest. And, as long as UConn and Ville were still around, ND wasn't desperate yet.
In a nutshell, UConn should have already been in the ACC. It was Florida St's peevishness at Tobacco Road that allowed them to pull a power play (after accusing the ACC offices of looking out for bball and not for football), just to show who is boss. They proved their point.