Lunardi 72nd best bracketologist | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Lunardi 72nd best bracketologist

Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope next year I do not see one "Lunardi has spoken threads".
I also hope we have no reason to even be paying attention to Joey Rackets next year. He got wayyyy too much play on the BY and while many of us knew he was a hack, some fell victim to the ESPN brainwashing that his word is gospel.

It was rather comical to see his whine and complain that the committee got it wrong and that he got it right...better luck next year clown

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebask...e-committee-got-so-much-wrong-and-here-is-how
 
I also hope we have no reason to even be paying attention to Joey Rackets next year. He got wayyyy too much play on the BY and while many of us knew he was a hack, some fell victim to the ESPN brainwashing that his word is gospel.

It was rather comical to see his whine and complain that the committee got it wrong and that he got it right...better luck next year clown

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebask...e-committee-got-so-much-wrong-and-here-is-how
I think he can be fun to read, and his site is the most convenient one for looking at the necessary nitty-gritty details (less him, to be fair). He's also not the worst at his job. I do look forward to seeing the new brackets, but mostly for nostalgia's sake.

His whining here is insufferable, though. He looked bad and he knew it.
 
I think he can be fun to read, and his site is the most convenient one for looking at the necessary nitty-gritty details (less him, to be fair). He's also not the worst at his job. I do look forward to seeing the new brackets, but mostly for nostalgia's sake.

His whining here is insufferable, though. He looked bad and he knew it.
He's about as good at being a bracketologist as Uncle Jack is at being a lawyer...amazing avatar btw buddy
 
Because if your dense ass can't figure it out, then there is none. Brilliant.

LOL. Why don't you let me in on the secret? I guess the rest of the dense world could also use your help... since the criteria used to select Tulsa and Syracuse seems to be lost on almost everyone.
 
I think he can be fun to read, and his site is the most convenient one for looking at the necessary nitty-gritty details (less him, to be fair). He's also not the worst at his job. I do look forward to seeing the new brackets, but mostly for nostalgia's sake.

His whining here is insufferable, though. He looked bad and he knew it.
I thought Lunardi's piece was fine. His points on Syracuse, Monmouth and Tulsa seem perfectly fair.
It's also a fair point that matching the committee doesn't necessarily make you the best at this, because it sure looks like they're making it up as they go. NC State two years ago was a made-up pick, Tulsa this year. If you didn't have those teams in, you were being rational. It's not the analyst's fault if the committee is off the wall.
 
Let me get this straight, Lunardi can't guess what the committee is thinking?
 
LOL. Why don't you let me in on the secret? I guess the rest of the dense world could also use your help... since the criteria used to select Tulsa and Syracuse seems to be lost on almost everyone.
A lot of people had Cuse (still a surprise).

I do not think anyone is faulting him for Tulsa, no one had them.
 
Let me get this straight, Lunardi can't guess what the committee is thinking?
If you made your reputation claiming to be able to do exactly that, it's a problem.
 
If you made your reputation claiming to be able to do exactly that, it's a problem.

The committee is predictably unpredictable. Every year they seem to use a new matrix for picking teams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you perform embarrassingly, do you get to keep the job?
Nope, but he will. ESPN created this little sideshow and they make up the rules.
 
The difference this year is there is not one team that stands out and anyone, just about any team can win it.

Go Huskies, even though we are doomed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
242
Guests online
1,666
Total visitors
1,908

Forum statistics

Threads
164,032
Messages
4,379,161
Members
10,172
Latest member
ctfb19382


.
..
Top Bottom