LSU type schedule has Perks | The Boneyard

LSU type schedule has Perks

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PhillyCoach

Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
642
Reaction Score
4,068
Many posters went back and forth about LSU's easy schedule and Geno's (play the best.) All in all in a regular season I follow Geno's method. However, we now can see how an LSU easy schedule (UConn vs BE) has many benefits/perks.

Geno rarely played freshman in the past. Of course, out of necessity, Geno had to play KK and Ash. Now we see that both have easily earned the right to start. Geno was locked into playing 7 and sometimes in (tight games) a 6 man rotation. The EASY schedule allows the distribution of minutes to go to 9 players, with 7 getting lots of minutes. Remember the recent game when Geno had 4 freshman plus Ines -- starting the 4th quarter.

The Easy schedule helps build confidence. It develops a more relaxed player who can put into play all the practice moves/situations/skill building. One or two games of productivity can change an entire season. Ice is a different player now. She has now done it in a college game. She knows that she can do it. It is fun to help the team win. Did you see her smile after the game. That was the first time this season she had that look and vibe. The easy schedule makes it possible.

Geno seems more upbeat (winning 10 in a row helps) and he is having fun experimenting with combinations on the floor. His goal of having Ice and AE play together is shaping up.
Yes, it seems obvious to many, but an easy schedule has many perks. For UConn, this schedule was a blessing in disguise.

Now, I want to see the next step ---"how does all this translate into "good play" against a top 15 opponent?" I can't wait.
 
I think playing easy teams does very little for you. We've only had a few "easy" teams like Ball State, Toronto, and S. Conn. and what did we get out of it?
Not much!
The rest of our schedule were ranked or not too bad.
I think those losses we had earlier helped to put a bad taste in the mouths of our players and spurred them on to practice harder and smarter.

Like you, PhillyCoach, I follow Geno's method. Iron sharpens iron. It also gets our confidence up and its not a false confidence from playing "patsies".
 
And don't forget, Geno dislikes when his teams coast thru the season without much pushback, as he's had a difficult time in the past convincing teams that there are a whole lot of things that they needed to work on. Certain times, it came back to haunt them in the NCAAT.
 
I forgot to mention a top priority for most of us--keep the starters fresh and not over worked. Check the number of minutes per starter for the season. Everyone is under 31 minutes. Well rested so far and the BE schedule should keep them well rested. One more thing. Less stress for the coaches, players, and us (fans.)
 
And yet this “easy” portion of the schedule is still significantly better than LSU. Marquette, Creighton and Seton Hall up next are quad 1 wins. St Johns is in the top 100 and even Lowley Providence would have been in the upper half of LSU’s non-con.
 
.-.
Maybe no so good. But here we are rooting for teams above us to fall so we can get back into top 10. Good day so far, LSU falls, Stanford falls, Virginia Tech falls. We could be back. Keep it up Huskies. USC likely to fall to UCLA later. and Baylor and Texas lost yesterday, Baylor's second in a row.
 
Blond D. said:
I think playing easy teams does very little for you. We've only had a few "easy" teams like Ball State, Toronto, and S. Conn. and what did we get out of it?
Not much!
The rest of our schedule were ranked or not too bad.
I think those losses we had earlier helped to put a bad taste in the mouths of our players and spurred them on to practice harder and smarter.

Like you, PhillyCoach, I follow Geno's method. Iron sharpens iron. It also gets our confidence up and its not a false confidence from playing "patsies".
Expand ...
Agree that it’s best to play the best. FWIW, Massey had Ball St ahead of Auburn this AM (ranked 65 and 66). Geno’s “easy” games are one Kim’s hardest challenges thus far - apparently a challenge that LSU was not up to.
 
.-.
I really don’t pay attention to LSU or Auburn. No way to tell, but after watching today, i can’t see Uconn not getting into the 70s or more vs Auburn. LSU was not impressive given its all star line-up. But it’s only one game. I haven’t a clue how LSU’s schedule factors in.
 
.-.
UConn should be top 7 after this weekend
LSU Stanford UCLA and VT all lost and UConn is killin it.
 
Big upset day as #2 UCLA falls to USC! Some of the old weaknesses popped back up as their top five players not named Betts went 15/41 from the field! Rice, their vaunted pg, had one assist against five turnovers. UCLA turned it over 22 times and committed 32 fouls! JuJu was 16 for 16 as USC scored 24 points from the line!
 
Tonyc said:
UConn should be top 7 after this weekend
LSU Stanford UCLA and VT all lost and UConn is killin it.
Expand ...
I think the only one we pass in the ranking is VT of those 4. Possibly Baylor as well! But we saw what happened last week so I am expecting very little movement on our end. I hope I am wrong!
 
.-.
I believe we haven't seen Paige and Ice's real game yet. Paige, as amazing as she is, is still playing kind of tentative. Ice is just getting started. I hope this past St John's game is Ice's coming out party. Ice can be a real X factor this season if she plays loose and free. I love that Ice can knock down that three. It adds another dimension to her game. I would love to see her just drive that ball in the basket every time she gets it.
 
the LSU-type schedule did not "toughen" them up, or help them be able to handle adversity, or to play under pressure. They Lost to an UNRANKED Team with 5 losses on their record so far this season.. Yes, LSU was on the road, BUT on paper, this should have been their game.
 
Haley Van Lith had 3 points (1/9 from the floor; 1/2 at the line), no rebounds, 1 assist, and four TO's in her 28 minutes. Morrow had a Morrow-like game - 12 points, 15 rebounds, 2 assists and four steals. Sounds strange, but LSU was 0/2 as a team from 3, assuming the box score I looked at is correct. They also missed nine free throws.
 
Ranked teams lose, unranked teams win. It means little in reality except maybe a slap in the face for a ranked team like LSU (#7). Wake up, you're not as good as you think you are. UCLA (#2) losing to USC (#9) is not a surprise as the Trojans behind the play of Juju Watkins can beat anyone. Stanford (#8) losing to Colorado (#5) is, according to the rankings, how it should be. Baylor (#4) is going to tumble after losing two games in a row. But I seriously doubt that we will move up much. It doesn't matter where we're rated as long as we keep winning and more importantly learning, improving, developing, one game at a time. Come March is where we can (and hoping will) move up in the ratings.
 
I posted this in the LSU thread wrt ranking and how far they'd drop after yesterday's loss, and the perk for the lower SOS in early season didn't hurt them in the polls, especially as they were the pre-season #1. It takes a lot of voters a lot of courage to downvote a team that's winning against much lesser opponents, versus downvoting teams that lose to ranked ones.
 
PhillyCoach said:
Many posters went back and forth about LSU's easy schedule and Geno's (play the best.) All in all in a regular season I follow Geno's method. However, we now can see how an LSU easy schedule (UConn vs BE) has many benefits/perks.

Geno rarely played freshman in the past. Of course, out of necessity, Geno had to play KK and Ash. Now we see that both have easily earned the right to start. Geno was locked into playing 7 and sometimes in (tight games) a 6 man rotation. The EASY schedule allows the distribution of minutes to go to 9 players, with 7 getting lots of minutes. Remember the recent game when Geno had 4 freshman plus Ines -- starting the 4th quarter.

The Easy schedule helps build confidence. It develops a more relaxed player who can put into play all the practice moves/situations/skill building. One or two games of productivity can change an entire season. Ice is a different player now. She has now done it in a college game. She knows that she can do it. It is fun to help the team win. Did you see her smile after the game. That was the first time this season she had that look and vibe. The easy schedule makes it possible.

Geno seems more upbeat (winning 10 in a row helps) and he is having fun experimenting with combinations on the floor. His goal of having Ice and AE play together is shaping up.
Yes, it seems obvious to many, but an easy schedule has many perks. For UConn, this schedule was a blessing in disguise.

Now, I want to see the next step ---"how does all this translate into "good play" against a top 15 opponent?" I can't wait.
Expand ...
UConn doesn't have a player on the roster that isn't a top recruit. All of them would shine if they had the chance to play every game getting quality minutes and the last two years proved that out. If they are completely healthy last year Lou is a role player at best and most likely doesn't even get drafted. She gets time on the court with other great players and she moves up the draft board just as any person on the current roster would.

Geno has always had a short rotation and I think if they were 100% healthy this year it would be no different against the better teams. It is a system that has worked better than any other coaches system so why change now? This year I think the Freshmen are benefitting from injuries and proving they can play, but in the end my MIP by the seasons end will be Ice.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,543
Messages
4,581,543
Members
10,491
Latest member
7774Forever


Top Bottom