And Louisville beat UCONN to a more stable conference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Louisville beat UCONN to a more stable conference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Louisville beat UCONN to a more stable conference.
That's my point!!
Wasn't clear, it read as you were trying to 1UP Louisvill
Well that too. I don't particularly care for Louisville.
I like Warde Manuel. Smart guy. Making some nice moves given the school's current circumstanses.
But he's no Tom Jurich...
Sent from my BlackBerry Z10 using Tapatalk 2
Any idea how UL can claim such a huge gain in AD revenue over the last couple of years? It is miles ahead of the rest of the BE, while sharing the same crappy tv money. I can't believe moving from Freedom Hall to Yum! acounts for all of it, as fannies in the seats hasn't changed much. It can't be all luxury suites, although apparently UL raped the city regarding rent and everything else. From where I sit, not knowing or caring much about college revenues (until it had a negative affect on UConn) it looks like UL is cooking the books as part of its push for getting into the B12 and later the ACC.I'm not a Louisville guy at all, but Tom Jurich is pound-for-pound one of the best ADs in the country (probably top 5). When you look at Louisville's conference situation, facilities and revenue now compared to when he started there (which coincided with the beginning of the BCS era), it's wouldn't be an exaggeration to state that no single athletic department has been transformed in a more dramatic fashion during that timeframe. WVU's Oliver Luck is up there, too, so I don't think that it's an accident at all that WVU and Louisville were both able to find lifelines out of the old Big East. There's only a finite amount of "proactiveness" that a school can take in conference realignment (as much of it might be due to fixed or closed to fixed factors such as location, TV market, academic reputation, etc.), but both Jurich and Luck maximized that finite amount to the fullest. Most ADs aren't extraordinarily good or bad either way (and Manuel probably fits into that large mass in the middle), but Jurich and Luck are definitely among the few that you can legitimately call high-impact ADs.
Um, that is called seizing the opportunity. Things were getting ugly real fast, in the Big East. WVU went to war and called in the big dogs when Louisville tried to take their spot in the Big 12. Luck and WVU get much props for fighting their way off the sinking ship.Come on Frank, Ollie Luck lucked out because TAM left for the SEC and they needed another school like QUICK, although I don't blame them for leaving. Jurich while supposedly acting in some capacity for the BIG EAST was wooing the ACC. While Herbst and Manuel were sipping drinks poolside in the Carribean. Should have been working the phones at least.
Any idea how UL can claim such a huge gain in AD revenue over the last couple of years? It is miles ahead of the rest of the BE, while sharing the same crappy tv money. I can't believe moving from Freedom Hall to Yum! acounts for all of it, as fannies in the seats hasn't changed much. It can't be all luxury suites, although apparently UL raped the city regarding rent and everything else. From where I sit, not knowing or caring much about college revenues (until it had a negative affect on UConn) it looks like UL is cooking the books as part of its push for getting into the B12 and later the ACC.
Um, that is called seizing the opportunity. Things were getting ugly real fast, in the Big East. WVU went to war and called in the big dogs when Louisville tried to take their spot in the Big 12. Luck and WVU get much props for fighting their way off the sinking ship.
There is no buyers remorse. The whining you hear now is more work by Luck to try and leverage some scheduling concessions for his school. I mean the travel in our current league is not going to be a picnic either.I say a good job for WVU and they wound up in a better spot than the AAC, obviously, but there is still a certain amount of buyer's remorse what with all the travel issues and associated expense.
Come on Frank, Ollie Luck lucked out because TAM left for the SEC and they needed another school like QUICK, although I don't blame them for leaving. Jurich while supposedly acting in some capacity for the BIG EAST was wooing the ACC. While Herbst and Manuel were sipping drinks poolside in the Carribean. Should have been working the phones at least.
Come on Frank, Ollie Luck lucked out because TAM left for the SEC and they needed another school like QUICK, although I don't blame them for leaving. Jurich while supposedly acting in some capacity for the BIG EAST was wooing the ACC. While Herbst and Manuel were sipping drinks poolside in the Carribean. Should have been working the phones at least.
There is no buyers remorse. The whining you hear now is more work by Luck to try and leverage some scheduling concessions for his school. I mean the travel in our current league is not going to be a picnic either.
L'Ville would have to have books to cook. I think they just make up numbers, it is certainly how they got the arena built.
It was a smart PR campaign. They just dumped all department revenues like sponsorships and donations, etc., into one sport. That's how they claimed that Ville bball was the most lucrative around. They just cooked the books a little bit, then called the media's attention to it.
The top line # has be for real however. Total revenues are real. They can only be cooked by giving ALL the school's royalty money to sports and by not including any facility money.
Another way is to start a capital campaign for sports facilities, and when you're ready to go, dump all the donations into sports as sports revenue while the academic side bonds the entirety of the buildout. I've seen that used to.
As for Louisville, if you go back just a few years, you'll see that they were under UConn in revenue. So, the extra revenue (about $15-20 million) seems to be entirely the result of free buildings and filling up extra seats. Jurich deserves the credit there.
I'm much less impressed by claims to Villebball being the most lucrative. If you look at Ville's column for AD revenues outside football and bball, it's barren. Everything got dumped into bball.
One way to compare the schools is sponsorships and royalties. UConn brings in $25 million while Louisville is up to $16 million from $12 a couple years ago.
Can't like this post enough. He is public enemy #1 for where we are today.I understand the bitterness but most of it is directed at the wrong AD. The ground work for UConn's conference situation was all laid out by Hathaway. He hired PP, he allowed the APR situation to occur, he woefully understaffed our compliance department, alienated big doners, and never got the new basketball facility off the ground. It took Pendergast, what, like three months (during a recession!) to get enough cash to start the building process... and it had been on the table for what seems like a decade.
But they are accounting for revenues that should, under any equitable arrangement, be going to the city/arena, so I say you don't have books to cook. You have two books, spread across two entities, with all the revenue being accounted for by the school, and all of the expenses by the arena/city/state. I've had some wealthy neighbors if I took their paychecks, and sent them my mortgage, would that make me rich?? In L'Ville, Kentucky I suppose so, but not anywhere else.
EDIT: And I would add, they are also co&kblocking the city from trying to lure an NBA franchise (long-short for sure), so not only are they stealing revenue, they are actually preventing the city/arena from attempting to pay the $890M that the arena is going to end up costing them, all while not producing 1/2 of the TIF revenue that they promised the city. And this is the "partner" the ACC selected.
That happens at every school anyway. The academic side takes care of facilities and you never see it on any ADs ledgers. Well, you do see it a little bit. Michigan's AD, for instance, shells out $2 million a year for the bonding of facilities to the academic side. But the academic side spent more than $260m for this purpose just 2 years ago. $2 million to service $260m? Hmmmmm.
But that is at least kept within the sphere of the university. What I am talking about here is accounting for revenues that by all means should not be going to Louisville at all, absent, what appears to be, complete corruption in Louisville/Kentucky, while simultaneously moving the costs completely outside of the university (unlike the Michigan example).