Plebe
La verdad no peca pero incomoda
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2016
- Messages
- 19,681
- Reaction Score
- 71,438
Breathed on Turner from about 4 feet away.Missed that intentional on Fuerhing. What did she do?
Breathed on Turner from about 4 feet away.Missed that intentional on Fuerhing. What did she do?
Unbalanced calls all game. Hard to overcome the disparity.That’s some bad reffing there
Unsportsmanlike. For some reason that no honest person can fathom.
ND 82
Louisville 69
Breathed on Turner from about 4 feet away.
Because it's way more important for Notre Dame to play Boston College twice.Boggles my mind why these two don’t play each other twice in the ACC regular season.
And the gap between rule and application is yawning.View attachment 38145
Rule 10, Section 13, Art. 1(c)
The contact was minimal but that was the applicable ruling.
In 99% of similar instances, it’s a “play on”.View attachment 38145
Rule 10, Section 13, Art. 1(c)
The contact was minimal but that was the applicable ruling.
Grow upSo did anyone catch the handshake between muppett & Waldo?
Beat #2 by 14. Easy game.
The best part is there was not rancor or bad sportsmanship and certainly nothing for Walz to grumble about postgame.
Except for the way too many bad calls--it was a fun game to watch. Aike was up to her old tricks and got away with it.Unbalanced calls all game. Hard to overcome the disparity.
We saw the fear in their eyes in the third quarter, and the third quarter is always ours and always will be ours."
-- Marina Mabrey
Was that quote towards the refs?
And the gap between rule and application is yawning.
There's no doubt in my mind that Dunham was intentionally fouling Turner so as to put ND's worst free throw shooter on the line. Turner went down before Dunham could actually make much contact, but the fact remains. It's a textbook example of that particular rule.
Suddenly I'm living in an alternate universe. It's almost as if I haven't been watching basketball my entire life.There's no doubt in my mind that Dunham was intentionally fouling Turner so as to put ND's worst free throw shooter on the line. Turner went down before Dunham could actually make much contact, but the fact remains. It's a textbook example of that particular rule.
The fact that the refs often ignore that rule doesn't make the call here any less correct.
Besides, ND was up 7 with the ball with less than 30 seconds left. The only thing that call affected was the final margin of ND's victory.
Suddenly I'm living in an alternate universe. It's almost as if I haven't been watching basketball my entire life.
What? You mean dunking is LEGAL now??Rules change over time. I just cited the current rule for that situation.
Rules change over time. I just cited the current rule for that situation.