I guess we ought to chuck Lou.Napheesa is 32/37 from the floor in the last three games.
Unfortunately, Lou is 8/29 from three in the last four games.
Napheesa is 32/37 from the floor in the last three games.
Unfortunately, Lou is 8/29 from three in the last four games.
Lou gets a lot of glory and deservedly so. But Collier is one of the most unique players I've seen at UConn, or anywhere in WCBB. She's so quick and precise in her cuts. She really knows how to plant that foot and make that move to the hoop. She has great deception on the pick and roll. She has a great variety of shots around the basket. She has great awareness of where she is under the hoop. She knows her spots on the floor, and frequently she'll receive a pass, whether she's stationary or on the move, exactly on the block. Always on the block. She's knows which spots on the floor where her shot is most effective. When she goes in the lane she'll receive the pass in the same spot. Gabby plays with a lot of energy, but Phessa also plays with and incredible amount of energy and pace. Where Lou is silky on her shots, Pheesa is graceful. Pheesa has the best hands on the team for receiving passes; some of the best in WCBB. She's the best on the team at reading the ball off the rim. I don't think I've ever seen a more consistent player. She gives you the same game every game. The best part is, she's a sophomore. As teams develop schemes to stop her she'll get stronger. She's going to develop better footwork. She'll find more effective spots on the floor. She's going to become better defensively. She's going to become a better outside shooter. She's going to develop a better handle. She's going to learn to read her teammates better. Geno can say what he wants, but I don't think anyone thought she was going to be this good.
Victor is correct, "Unfortunately" is the key word here and is noting just that-KLS has been unfortunate with her shots lately for whatever reason. Water seeks its own level, and while KLS might be experiencing an ebb tide, soon the water will flow. Keep the faith!Napheesa is 32/37 from the floor in the last three games.
Unfortunately, Lou is 8/29 from three in the last four games.
No, she is missing them from the same spots that she was making them from previously, i.e., from one end of the 3-point line to the other. And spring will come -- you and she just have to have faith (and patience).I wish I could find a chart of Samuelson's shots taken. It seems like most of the shots that she has been missing are from deep at the top of the key. I always though her sweet spot was from the corner.
Geno can say what he wants, but I don't think anyone thought she was going to be this good.
That's something I sometimes forget about Pheesa and Lou--we'll get to enjoy them for another 2+ years! We're so spoiled!The best part is, she's a sophomore.
Lou gets a lot of glory and deservedly so. But Collier is one of the most unique players I've seen at UConn, or anywhere in WCBB. She's so quick and precise in her cuts. She really knows how to plant that foot and make that move to the hoop. She has great deception on the pick and roll. She has a great variety of shots around the basket. She has great awareness of where she is under the hoop. She knows her spots on the floor, and frequently she'll receive a pass, whether she's stationary or on the move, exactly on the block. Always on the block. She's knows which spots on the floor where her shot is most effective. When she goes in the lane she'll receive the pass in the same spot. Gabby plays with a lot of energy, but Phessa also plays with and incredible amount of energy and pace. Where Lou is silky on her shots, Pheesa is graceful. Pheesa has the best hands on the team for receiving passes; some of the best in WCBB. She's the best on the team at reading the ball off the rim. I don't think I've ever seen a more consistent player. She gives you the same game every game. The best part is, she's a sophomore. As teams develop schemes to stop her she'll get stronger. She's going to develop better footwork. She'll find more effective spots on the floor. She's going to become better defensively. She's going to become a better outside shooter. She's going to develop a better handle. She's going to learn to read her teammates better. Geno can say what he wants, but I don't think anyone thought she was going to be this good.
Different strengths for different players. What would Lou's shooting percentage be if she had to live on the block or receive hard pocket passes off the pick and roll?Napheesa is an incredible player without question. However, what would her shooting percentage be if she shot as many 3s as Lou? Lou is 77 out of 179. Napheesa is 9 out of 24. If Napheesa shot the 3 more, her percentage would increase. A difference of 155 3s is a lot.
I wish I could find a chart of Samuelson's shots taken. It seems like most of the shots that she has been missing are from deep at the top of the key. I always though her sweet spot was from the corner.
Different strengths for different players. What would Lou's shooting percentage be if she had to live on the block or receive hard pocket passes off the pick and roll?
And Pheesa can shoot the 3 and is good from 15-17. What I'm saying stands. It has NOTHING to do with toughness. Different players have different strengths and weaknesses, and if Lou had to play on the block her percentage would go down. Similarly if the majority of her game depended on setting hard picks and taking low or hard pocket passes. There her TO rate would go up.JordyG, Lou could play on the block. She's shown how tough she is. She played the semi final against Oregon St with a broken foot. She looked liked death warmed over against Maryland, threw up during the game, and if it hadn't been for her second half performance, UConn would have lost.What are you saying? Lou certainly is tough enough. She just happens to be their best 3-point shooter and one of the best in the country.
Here we are not talking about doing well. We're talking about effectiveness. We're talking about strengths and weaknesses, specifically about shooting percentages. chrissaran questioned what Pheesa's shooting percentage would be if she shot so many 3's. Ridiculous. My answer was Lou's shooting percentage would drop if she had to contend more with those trees inside. Lou just doesn't have the variety of shots inside to play most of the time on the block. Pheesa doesn't have the consistency of shot to do curls and step around screens. His argument is bankrupt.I think Lou would do quite well. The thing that has impressed me the most with these two is not the great stats, its in the critical moments/games when they happen. I.E. Pheese game against FL. ST., Lou at Maryland.... Not to excited about these conference games, let's see how they perform on Monday. Really excited to see them go against some size again.
I think some of them have been long too.Lou's 3pt shots have been short, maybe she's a little bit tired.
As Geno said, this is the worst that they will be. Yikes!That's something I sometimes forget about Pheesa and Lou--we'll get to enjoy them for another 2+ years! We're so spoiled!