It could hurt - it could help.Couldn't hurt, could it?
It could hurt - it could help.
Hasn't played position all year. Fumbles and picking up blitzes would be a concern I would think.
His dad on the UConn FB Facebook page requesting it could hurt as well - or not.
Our running backs have not been as good as advertised other than Newsome. Maybe this could be a good move. McAllister has been very good on special teams. He clearly seems to want more playing time based on how hard he plays on special teams.
That is actually true. Now that the offensive line has stabilized a bit, I expected to see more progress in the RBs. Other than Newsome, there hasn't been much to get excited about. I really thought Johnson and Marriner would have taken a step forward by now. At this point, Max looks like the best option behind AN. You would have to assume that McAllister was behind RJ and JM if he was moved to defense. Or...he choose to move himself. Either way, hard to believe he would be better off to move back. Especially mid season.
And....does Pal intentionally spell players names wrong...or just careless? "Allister"? "Steward"? Surprised he didn't spell it "Boil".
replace word REQUEST with TELLS/ASKS/QUESTIONS/COMMENTS...Posting a comment on a Facebook fan page really isn't a request ... just a passionate fan's opinion. I doubt this even registers a blip on the coaching staff's radar.
Allister was a very good high school running back. He hasn't gotten any burn at CB.
We moved Walsh the other way and it paid off.
Walsh was not moved by "we" but rather than a threat to transfer if not put on the D side of the ball.
Curious... Got any verifiable proof to back up that bold statement? First hand info, second hand info or run of the mill rumor mill?
Please don't ask him this. If he knows something, you're just encouraging him to screw his source. If he doesn't know anything, you're just encouraging him to make something up.
This is stuff we shouldn't know, if true, and shouldn't think might be true, if false.
No spitting match here Pal but I disagree. Walsh was not moved by "we" but rather than a threat to transfer if not put on the D side of the ball. He does have value there but the vision at the time he was going to be the next Dion Anderson / Tank Sherman type fullback. With our present core of RB's it is obvious a fullback of his caliber would be much more valuable on the O side of the line. The D could get by without him, the O desperately needs his type. Our RB situation is one deep at 170 lbs not sure of all the team comrade our head coach preaches. Our QB is the second leading rusher on the team which is not designed to run the option. JMHO a pay off would be to have Walsh on the other side of the ball...Just say'n...
Is there ever a good time for your mom to be on Facebook?Glad my Mom didn't have Facebook when I was playing...
No spitting match here Pal but I disagree. Walsh was not moved by "we" but rather than a threat to transfer if not put on the D side of the ball. He does have value there but the vision at the time he was going to be the next Dion Anderson / Tank Sherman type fullback. With our present core of RB's it is obvious a fullback of his caliber would be much more valuable on the O side of the line. The D could get by without him, the O desperately needs his type. Our RB situation is one deep at 170 lbs not sure of all the team comrade our head coach preaches. Our QB is the second leading rusher on the team which is not designed to run the option. JMHO a pay off would be to have Walsh on the other side of the ball...Just say'n...
Same with McAllister and glad his family wants to see him playing.I'm sure there are about 90 sets of parents want to see their child play...It would be AWESOME if they were all on social media giving their input.