You think Calhoun is the best ever because you are a UConn fan.
More with less? They recruit the rosters if he had less.... connect the dots?
I don't disagree with your conclusion, but there's clearly more to it than just that. Otherwise, there would be no point in discussing the topic at all.
If someone wants to tell me they're high school coach is better than K, fine. It'll sound ridiculous, but it is conceivable because there is nothing to disprove the assertion. That tends to happen when you focus on a singular element of a comparison. In this case, you could make a legitimate argument that 'coaching' is separate from recruiting and therefore more subjective. It's the type of argument you make when you have no other ground to stand on, sure, but that doesn't mean it's wrong.