Not this last time. That was all about FB prowess and what FSU and Clemson wanted. Had we been challnging for the BE title and going to upper Tier bowl games we would have looked every bit as good as Lousville did.
I think that you are right.
Basketball always ran the ACC and was the prime sport...especially in Tobacco Road. Then FSU came along and later Miami and football was sort of semi important, but not to everybody.
But...funding changed. Basketball used to pay the bills and it sort of snuck up on the ACC when football came to account for 80% of the revenue.
The period of changeover was strife ridden as the old basketball gatekeepers wanted to assure, first and foremost, the premier basketball league while the football schools said.."Football is paying the bills...the conference will live or die on football...and we need more strength".
It finally came to a head when a chance to fill Maryland's spot opened up....and a group of football schools prevailed (with ESPN's tacit blessing).
Had UConn had the perception in 2011 as a strong football power, it might have gone UConn's way since the basketball gods at Duke and UNC would have turned cartwheels.
From a blog of the time: early 2012
"As a conference the ACC backed the wrong horse and it is a little late to climb aboard the football train. What happens next is anyone's guess. Certainly pulling Notre Dame in would be great, but the Fighting Irish have no need to make that move until they are at the end of their rope in the big picture.
The league is what it is; a basketball first conference pulling in two more solid basketball programs while swimming in a pond built for the football sharks. It happens. Sometimes you pick wrong in the grand scheme of things.
All you can do is recognize your mistake and hope to fix it in the future. In the case of the ACC, they have to hope they can fix it before things get to a point of no return. As teams look for a way out, a way to make more money, the ACC must come up with a strategy to improve their marketable product. "