Ok, Meyers, I apologize to you too. If you say you are not defending them, then you weren't. Some of your posts sure sounded like you were saying that they really owed her nothing and were doing her no damage. Obviously that was not your intent, so apologies.
connfan68 said:
↑
Not quite.
They are denying her the opportunity to continue her studies, as she can't afford it as a non-scholarship student. K-State may not get another decent wcbb recruit in a long time. Serves them right.
Well that's not true. She can go to K State for free. AND like millions of other people who can't afford to go to college, it's not K State's fault they can't afford it.
Meyers said:
Well that's not true. She can go to K State for free. AND like millions of other people who can't afford to go to college, it's not K State's fault they can't afford it.
I'm not defending K State, I don't like what they are doing. But some of you people need to think about what you are saying. The point was, she is not being held "hostage". She's being F& #ed over. And yes hopefully, K State regrets this down the road. (even if they fix it)
She is a financial hostage.
No, not really. She isn't being forced to buy anything. She isn't being forced to pay to leave.
I just don't think "hostage" is the right word.