- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,908
- Reaction Score
- 8,293
I feel like on3 rates a few guys way differently than the others every year just to justify the existence of their site. Then they come out with an article about "why we rate them differently than everyone else" and it's never very compelling.I prefer 247 composite over the others. None are great. On3 and ESPN always seem particularly awful to me.
I think the on3 guy started 24/7, then sold it, started on3, and is hoping for the same.
Also, the NIL valuations on that site are not only stupid as hell, and nothing but but wild guess based on nothing, but I think detrimental....although, so far, not to us.