Mister2
Looking for Mister1
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction Score
- 472
Thanks HGN....PAHuskey, I agree with you.Based upon pertinent numbers , Lou should win it. With only Laska and Vivians giving a little chase. Laska being the scoring leader of the 5 Finalists , and Vivians the leading scorer for an undefeated and Conference winning team. However , Lou is the leading scorer for an undefeated
and Conference winning team also. A team that has held the #1 ranking from wire to Wire and she's doing it in less min/game than all the others.
Good point.....Thanks HGN....
One other "stat"... points per minute:
Lou: .642
Durr: .650
Ogun: .607
Laksa: .615
Vivians: .650
This stat shows all 5 players produce at similar per minute rate, and convince me that the top 3 for this award are Lou, Durr and Vivians... and using the other stats, Lou...IMHO...is the clear Ann Meyers Drysdale award winner for 2017/18
Yep, you are right. That's why I said the statistical analysis I did was some what simplistic. But, IMHO, based on stats that we all want to see in a SG, Lou should win. But I know the voters will look for the player who is most consistently a producer, the player who comes through when her team needs it, the player who can manage to score some way despite what the defense is doing to her, the player who fights through elbows to the eye or other adversity to help her team, the player who can handle the ball (A/TO ratio). Yes, props to Laksa for scoring 40 pts in 2 games this year...but she scored 0 vs UConn in the 1st meeting. And she plays nearly the entire game most nights... if we assign points to the stats I provided, such as 1 point for best in category and 5 for worst... then take the overall total points, with low total score being best, Lou comes out best.The truth of the matter is awards are NEVER based on stats alone: stats play an important but never the whole part in the process. Otherwise choosing award winners can entirely be automated.
Obviously I believe KLS should win, based on the totality of her play, and I hope she does. However, I won't be surprised if it goes to Durr or Vivians (I'd be if it goes to either of the other 2).
Laksa is a prolific 3pt shooter... if I remember she has put up the most of the 5 finalists...and maybe most in the country, she just isn't the most prolific 3pt shot maker... VERY low percentage compared to 3 of the other finalists.I would be shocked of Laksa was the winner based on on name recognition but more importantly she is shooting under 40% not just on 3s but for overall FG% (39.7%)? I get she is not surrounded by the same talent but that is surprising to see.
Its not all about the numbers, which I was actually surprised to see that Lou leads by so much in key stats for the position. However I do not think anyone would say Lou does not pass the eye test either
I have not completed my homework, and am looking for assistance. According to Wikipedia, since 2012 the Ann Meyers Drysdale Award is the name give to what was previously known as the USBWA Women's National Player of the Year award. I cannot locate anything specific as to the rules and criteria applicable to the award. I see nothing on Wikipedia tending to limit the award to shooting guards. Any help?
I like Laksa just fine. But from what little I've seen of her, she does not involve her teammates nearly as much as Lou. And her stats w/r/t ORB, DRB, TRB, APG and SPG are nowhere near to Lou's. Granted, Lou arguably has better players surrounding her. That certainly helps load up other statistical categories.But I want to give props to Laksa
I have not completed my homework, and am looking for assistance. According to Wikipedia, since 2012 the Ann Meyers Drysdale Award is the name give to what was previously known as the USBWA Women's National Player of the Year award. I cannot locate anything specific as to the rules and criteria applicable to the award. I see nothing on Wikipedia tending to limit the award to shooting guards. Any help?
And, the first name of the award is "Shooting"... and while we all consider the entire game to be important, it would not be surprising if Offensive numbers are most important.... just sayingThis award (Ann Meyers Drysdale Shooting Guard of the Year) is a new award created by the WBCA. The Miller (SF), McClain (PF), and Leslie (C) awards are also new WBCA awards. The existing Lieberman award is also presented by the WBCA. So now there is an award for each position.
The USBWA's "Ann Meyers Drysdale Women's Player of the Year" is a different award.
The following stats compare the five finalists in categories that I would think are logically associated with Shooting Guards...there may be others, but these seemed to make sense to me:
And your table is "nicer formatted" than mine too... similar info that proves who should be the selectee.You inspired me to make my own table, which pulls in slightly different data than yours:
View attachment 28991
All stats from natstat.com/wbb (the artist formerly known as WBB State). The last row is their all-in-one metric. I included usage because there is an inverse relationship between usage and efficiency. In this case, Samuelson's usage is not so much lower that it adequately explains her extraordinary offensive efficiency.
Samuelson is the clear choice.
Laksa is clearly 5th out of 5, statistically. Of course, she plays with by far the least surrounding talent. She also plays the weakest schedule.
Laksa’s 3-Point percentage is higher than Ogunbowale’s.Make a is a prolific 3pt shooter... if I remember she has put up the most of the 5 finalists...and maybe most in the country, she just isn't the most prolific 3pt shot maker... VERY low percentage compared to the other finalists.