Duffy really glosses over the fact that it was the WAY he left. I think most, if not all, UConn fans understand his decision to leave. He was a senior and this was his place shot at the NCAAs. Roscoe was undoubtedly the more "disloyal" person, but he hasn't said a word so there is little to no vitriol. THAT is where this article should've gone.
I really liked Duffy's coverage during the year. But lately, he's seemed to become more like the other talking heads, trying to find stories and stir up speculation where there isn't any. I know it's the off-season, but come on!
Let's be honest, Bazz isn't going pro. Duffy promoting that idea is dumb. Saying Shabazz can't improve his stock with another year is even dumber.
Same case here. UConn's program is going in a different direction without AO. Oriakhi would not have fit into this team's culture and he's the reason the team was so fractured last year. As Benjordan states, its about the WAY he left, texting Pressey in the locker room after the NCAA tournament loss, and bad-mouthing a Hall of Fame coach and his methods.
Again, Duffy must be looking for things to write about, because I don't think anyone really cares about Oriakhi anymore. Yeah, people have disdain for him, but does this really warrant an article?! It's in the past.
Go back to writing good stuff about the team Kevin, you've been disappointing lately.
Also, he says the loyalty is overblown because it would have made absolutely no sense for the guys that stayed to transfer and sit out a year. This is ridiculous, Roscoe Smith did it, and Napier, Boatright and Daniels could have done the same thing.
I think one takeaway from the article is that it wasn't the transfer that irked fans so much but it was the childish comments on the way out. Never burn your bridges like he did. It will be noticed by pro scouts in evaluating players as potential team mates, not that AO has any shot at an NBA team.
They could have but it wouldnt have made any sense as they would have had to sit out a year before they were eligible. Who knows what they would have done in AO's situation. We like to romanticise the fact they stayed but they didn't really have any other great alternatives.
Yes, he wanted to play the 3 and UConn wanted him to play the 4. His decision apparently had nothing to do with the APR ban.Did it make sense for Roscoe?
Yes, he wanted to play the 3 and UConn wanted him to play the 4. His decision apparently had nothing to do with the APR ban.
If he stayed he might have been the 5. He could probably see that coming.Yes, he wanted to play the 3 and UConn wanted him to play the 4. His decision apparently had nothing to do with the APR ban.
I don't see the problem with the article, really. He does mention that Oriakhi messed up by taking shots at the program on his way out. I suppose he could have talked more about how ineffective Oriakhi was last year, but I don't think he was looking to completely slam the kid in this article.
And for the 100th time, Shabazz Napier is obviously thinking long and hard about declaring for the draft, and it's not because of a Kevin Duffy article. The fact that anyone would even mention Duffy as someone with any sort of influence over Napier's thought process is absurd.
I think the article overstates the villain aspect and Duffy overuses fan feedback (social media = from the internets where everyone is a critic and vitrol at its worst). Yes most fans are pissed the Oriakhi transferred and the initial and continued shots at Calhoun. But "one of the few true villains" is a little extreme for a guy that was on a national title team. Ultimately other than the internet there are no real world ramifications for UConn fans that are upset at Oriakhi for bashing Calhoun and tranferring. Fans are going to quickly move past it and eventually Oriakhi will grow up and stop with the constant criticism and shots at Calhoun. Perhaps he will be contrite in the 3rd of his Italian league career (sorry couldn't help it).
When did I say that? Oh, I didn't.
I'm implying that Duffy's articles are starting to turn into those written by someone who cares more about page views and reader attention by speculating rather than actually reporting anything. This AO article isn't reporting anything new, its just written to stir people up. And Duffy's viewpoint on Shabazz "not being able to improve his draft stock" next year seems like more of the same because that's simply not factual. NBA scouts are saying he should stay in order to improve.
It's just a shame because I liked Duffy. Last off-season he was one of the few to provide some actual insight and inside information on the team rather than the typical media speculation.