- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 10,040
- Reaction Score
- 10,553
Even when Temple's BE associate status ended, hadn't they been given a few years to achieve defined performance records (W-L) and failed?
PJ, I don't know a thing about you, but I think I love you. Keep preaching!Here's the pickle the B12 is in:
The logical adds for them are to go to 14 with UConn, Cincy, USF, UCF. Then they get into big markets (New England/New York, Ohio, Florida) and football recruiting territories. They also weaken the SEC and especially ACC in Florida. They do to the ACC and SEC -- diluting their hold on their biggest market and best recruiting territory -- what the SEC has done to the B12.
The challenge for them is: (1) ESPN absolutely hates that idea -- Florida is their gold mine and they have invested tremendously in the ACC which depends on Florida State remaining a flagship football program and SEC which depends on U Florida and Florida's cable market. Dilution of Florida would likely lead to retaliation, e.g. ESPN declining to bid on the B12's next contract. (2) Texas with its Longhorn Network is more loyal to ESPN than the B12. If the B12 crosses ESPN, Texas leaves for a Notre Dame type deal with the ACC, and B12 now has no presence at all in south Texas and is an AAC level conference, or only slightly above.
So ESPN has excluded Florida, and probably doesn't like losing UConn either but that is less bad because it only threatens BC, Syracuse, and Rutgers who don't draw much anyway. For ESPN Cincy to B12 might even be a positive as it may dilute B10's Ohio hold.
As a result, I've been predicting for a long time that UConn and Cincy going to 12 are the likely adds, and then when that proves inadequate and Texas leaves in 2024, either they add from (a) the Houston and BYU pool, seeking largest existing fanbases and consolidating a Texas presence, or (b) UCF/USF, taking it to ESPN with Fox's backing.
No precedent but if it were to ever happen, one program sticks out like a soRe thUmb.Agreed, definitely not analogous at all, just using it as an example of a football conference that has dumped a program before.
Is there actual precedence for a conference dumping an all-sports member? Tulane and Georgia Tech voluntarily left the SEC and South Carolina voluntarily left the ACC, but I can't think of an example of an all-sports member being dumped by a prominent conference.
Even when Temple's BE associate status ended, hadn't they been given a few years to achieve defined performance records (W-L) and failed?
No precedent but if it were to ever happen, one program sticks out like a soRe thUmb.
Fox caused the Big 12's demise.
CR post of the year.
That's not true. UConn accepted Big East offer to join in football in 1997. Temple's was voted out in 2001 and played a few more seasons (2004 last year?)Temple dumped from be to make room for uconn.
it's sort of the same thing isn't it... Maybe a different path, but it gets to the same end-game.I do not think it has happened and I don't think I will live to see it happen. It's much more likely that the cream of various conferences leave and form their own conference than that they throw the non-performers out.
The closest to this happening was when the Pacific Coast Conference disbanded and reformed as the Pac 8, adding Oregon St & Washington St while leaving Idaho & Montana behind.Is there actual precedence for a conference dumping an all-sports member? Tulane and Georgia Tech voluntarily left the SEC and South Carolina voluntarily left the ACC, but I can't think of an example of an all-sports member being dumped by a prominent conference.
ESPN told the old Southwest Conference to Dump,Rice, SMU, TCU,and Houston when they merged with the old Big 8 to form the Big 12The closest to this happening was when the Pacific Coast Conference disbanded and reformed as the Pac 8, adding Oregon St & Washington St while leaving Idaho & Montana behind.
No precedent but if it were to ever happen, one program sticks out like a soRe thUmb.
I See what yoU guys are doing there.There could Be another sChool on that list.
ESPN told the old Southwest Conference to Dump,Rice, SMU, TCU,and Houston when they merged with the old Big 8 to form the Big 12
The closest to this happening was when the Pacific Coast Conference disbanded and reformed as the Pac 8, adding Oregon St & Washington St while leaving Idaho & Montana behind.
I do not think it has happened and I don't think I will live to see it happen. It's much more likely that the cream of various conferences leave and form their own conference than that they throw the non-performers out.
Being on Fox hurts recruiting. Big 12's recruiting has stunk for a few years. Big 12 now stinks.
It's crazy how you can connect the dots.
Dig your heels in as much as you like with regards to being on ESPN.
The AAC is actually fairly decent and the Big 12 stinks out loud. What might the difference be?
UT will just hire Herman and the whole thing will be history.
Sort of related here cause there is some dead weight in the Big 12 at the bottom, but I wonder if we'll ever see a P5 conference expel a school again? The Big East dumped Temple cause of their on-field performance and perceived lack of investment in their football program and other schools through the years have voluntarily left P5 conferences (Tulane left the SEC in the 60s because of a concern that they were losing academically at the expense of football), but I wonder if we'll ever see that again.
There is some serious dead weight in the P5 (BC and Wake in ACC, Purdue in the B1G for example). Wonder if any other school will ever get its walking papers.
The Big East did not kick Temple out.
Temple was an affiliate. The Big East chose to not renew its relationship. That is a huge difference from kicking out a full member/partner in the conference.
Has never happened (at least for 50+ years). Never will.
The vote to add several football teams was agreed by Uconn with the caveat to be included if Uconn wished to move to FBS. 1997 Uconn said yes but non football teams agreed the BE football would not exceed 8 teams. Therefore when Uconn said yes the action against the only team in the BE football and not in the other sports became expendable. hense the "throw out" of TempleThat's not true. UConn accepted Big East offer to join in football in 1997. Temple's was voted out in 2001 and played a few more seasons (2004 last year?)
Uh, no. UConn was already an original member and becoming a football member didn't require an additional school being added to the mix. Nice theory though.The vote to add several football teams was agreed by Uconn with the caveat to be included if Uconn wished to move to FBS. 1997 Uconn said yes but non football teams agreed the BE football would not exceed 8 teams. Therefore when Uconn said yes the action against the only team in the BE football and not in the other sports became expendable. hense the "throw out" of Temple