Kansas, Nova, Virginia and the ESPN Hype Machine | The Boneyard

Kansas, Nova, Virginia and the ESPN Hype Machine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,634
Reaction Score
25,669
It's just been constant all year. These were their network coaching stars Self, Wright, and Bennett, the dream dies hard. So far the only one left out is Roy Williams and his program of term paperback writers.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
129
Reaction Score
186
Serious question, when was the last time Kansas hasn't been a 1 or 2 seed? I tried to look it up and couldn't find any info on it but I feel like since Bill Self has been coach they are always a 1 or 2 seed and more often than not, lose in the first weekend.
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2011
Messages
552
Reaction Score
942
Serious question, when was the last time Kansas hasn't been a 1 or 2 seed? I tried to look it up and couldn't find any info on it but I feel like since Bill Self has been coach they are always a 1 or 2 seed and more often than not, lose in the first weekend.
2009 they were a 3.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
10,837
Reaction Score
12,979
Serious question, when was the last time Kansas hasn't been a 1 or 2 seed? I tried to look it up and couldn't find any info on it but I feel like since Bill Self has been coach they are always a 1 or 2 seed and more often than not, lose in the first weekend.

good question, self has been exposed
 
Joined
Nov 9, 2011
Messages
552
Reaction Score
942
roy, K, cal, pitino are all bigger stars and advancing to the sweet 16. so did espn underhype them?????? or are they purposely not talking about it as part of a larger conspriacy against uconn? pls respond OP
 

Mr. French

Tremendous Individual
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
3,869
Reaction Score
15,727
Your point is correct, but your reasoning is way, way off.

Those guys aren't the example of the NCAA / ESPN / fix situation.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
1,046
Reaction Score
1,290
Kansas never loses at home, so they are good for very few losses, don't play a lot of tough games always predicted in Oct to be good etc.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,042
Reaction Score
6,596
Kansas was a mystery to me especially after the epic beat down by UK, but why wouldn't they hype nova and uva? 2 loss teams that steam rolled through their respective conferences.

Who should they have been hyping? Teams that are in the sweet 16? Unc looked like garbage up until the acc tourney (and reverted to garbage in the championship), WVU was up and down, msu is only not a surprise because of izzo, Wichita state was questioned all year because of sos, ucla was a joke for 3/4 of the season, etc

UK, duke, and Wisconsin are the only 3 teams that are doing what they're supposed to do right now. Arizona is too, but I don't think they've looked quite as dominant
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,790
Reaction Score
26,250
Ollie and Napier certainly got their fair share of positive hype after last year's run. I hate ESPN as much as the next yarder, but to say they hyped teams with 1 or 2 losses most of the season is absurd. I am fairly confident, that if UConn was 30-2, we would be hearing the same sort of buzz.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,660
Reaction Score
32,863
The news is that there is a new King in the state of Kansas, and it ain't the Jayhawks.

I didn't realize that Wichita State has been trying for decades to schedule games with them, and it took the Tournament to make it happen.

Lets see if the narrative now changes to give WSU the recognition and the in state Title they deserve.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
830
Reaction Score
516
Well Nova isn't an ESPN darling because they don't even have TV rights to NBE games. That being said, I could be wrong because ESPN produces so much s.hitty content that every year any team is simultaneously one of the best and worst teams of all time.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
5,290
Reaction Score
19,770
Ollie and Napier certainly got their fair share of positive hype after last year's run. I hate ESPN as much as the next yarder, but to say they hyped teams with 1 or 2 losses most of the season is absurd. I am fairly confident, that if UConn was 30-2, we would be hearing the same sort of buzz.

Based on the fact that we've been one of those dominant teams before and gotten a ton of buzz out of it, I'd tend to agree with you.
 

Dooley

Done with U-con athletics
Joined
Oct 7, 2012
Messages
9,960
Reaction Score
32,818
Let's play a fun game. Rank the biggest paper tigers in college basketball:

1. Kansas
2. Syracuse
3. Arizona
4. The entire Big East conference
5. UCLA
6. Indiana
7. Virginia
8. The Big 12 conference
9. Other - Write In Nominations
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,364
Reaction Score
68,239
I don't get all the Virginia stuff. They had a ton of injuries. That makes them a paper tiger?
 

Inyatkin

Stairway to Seven
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
2,479
Reaction Score
9,715
Either Michigan State and Izzo are awesome or Virginia is a paper tiger. It can't be both.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,277
Reaction Score
35,109
Let's play a fun game. Rank the biggest paper tigers in college basketball:

1. Kansas
2. Syracuse
3. Arizona
4. The entire Big East conference
5. UCLA
6. Indiana
7. Virginia
8. The Big 12 conference
9. Other - Write In Nominations
Why is Arizona a paper tiger?

In 2011 they were a 5 seed, destroyed Duke and lost in the E8.

In 2013 they made the S16 as a 6 seed.

In 2014 they were 1-seed who lost to a 2-seed on a controversial travel in the E8.

They've literally performed to seed or better every year Sean Miller has gotten them in the tournament. And this year, as a 2-seed, they're in the S16 playing 6-seed Xavier. My bet is they are back in E8.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,085
Reaction Score
71,218
I posted a long thing in another topic and I'm not going to repeat all of it, but Self's teams consistently overachieve in the regular season (finish higher in final poll than pre-season poll), and thus always have a good seed. Therefore, when they get beat, it's a major upset. If they had been 5 or 6 seeds lower, where probably they deserved to be a few of the years they got upset, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's all about how the narrative is framed by their seeding.

Honestly, we all knew they weren't a 2-seed this year. Anyone who didn't pick Wichita to beat them hasn't been watching this season. But they had a 2-seed's resume, because once again they overachieved this year. They won the Big 12 (the supposed best conference) with 10 freshmen and sophomores. Last year they lost Embiid to injury. And then 8 years ago they got upset twice in a row as high-ish seeds. In Self's other years they made 7 Sweet Sixteens.

UConn has a down year, we miss the tourny. Self's down years are a 2-seed getting beat in round of 64/32.
 

Inyatkin

Stairway to Seven
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
2,479
Reaction Score
9,715
Or maybe Bill Self is a great coach whose teams win 30 games in a down year and they lost to a really good, highly motivated Wichita State team. You know, the team that was in the Final Four two years ago and started 35-0 last season.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,957
Reaction Score
74,110
Winning is hard in college basketball, which makes UConn's string of rings all the more impressive. People shouldn't expect that they're due for another one anytime soon because very good teams come up short every year. Doesn't mean they're chokers or paper tigers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
286
Guests online
2,175
Total visitors
2,461

Forum statistics

Threads
159,078
Messages
4,179,553
Members
10,049
Latest member
MTSuitsky


.
Top Bottom