- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 99,313
- Reaction Score
- 392,649
same, but mostly, after being moribund for so many years, I like the program having energy.A little corny, but I like it.
Agree but Beats Bigger Faster StrongerO
same, but mostly, after being moribund for so many years, I like the program having energy.
Edsall was 98% process and 2% loyalty. He liked a much slower, lower energy approach. He liked hidden gems. He liked recruiting in new places because slowly and steadily he found himself walled off from much of his old places. He made walls, and then he made those walls higher and thicker. He almost never moved around a wall once erected. By example he had a bump his first year in NJ and seemingly pretty much stopped recruiting the state thereafter.Seeing a huge emphasis on recruiting with this staff.
Edsall just basically gave up on competing for higher end recruits.
Edsall just never understood the importance here. He just believed he could bring in uncut gems and Coach them up. Well, the talent market just doesn’t work like that anymore. And he was outcoached as well as out recruited.
And as the results went South so did our expectations. We became conditioned to believe the trolls and the talking heads that suggested only one team in the entire FBS should drop football. That we should consider the situation hopeless. I never bought it but the Edsall approach led credence to those trolls and a bunch of basketball nitwits who wanted football to fail. The new commitment and everything coming out of Mora and his staff says that's over.Edsall was 98% process and 2% loyalty. He liked a much slower, lower energy approach. He liked hidden gems. He liked recruiting in new places because slowly and steadily he found himself walled off from much of his old places. He made walls, and then he made those walls higher and thicker. He almost never moved around a wall once erected. By example he had a bump his first year in NJ and seemingly pretty much stopped recruiting the state thereafter.
No he is right - most basketball fans support football (some maybe while holding their nose) but there were many that advocated dropping football."basketball nitwits"... @Jimdish255 and it's posters with comments like that, that creates the divide. Be better...
I completely understand that it's out there. Nothing gained by stating it. I'm sure that there will be comments about dropping football to pay Ollie...but hopefully it's all tongue in cheek.No he is right - most basketball fans support football (some maybe while holding their nose) but there were many that advocated dropping football.
It has actually been worse than that for years. There has long been a group within the AD that wasn’t on board with football. Not at the senior level, of course, but next level down. The guys who do the day to day work. I thought it would fade away as we had success and those guys retired, but it kept regenerating and then we hired Pasqualoni, Batsht Bob and RE2 which didn’t help the case. The argument has always been you can’t do both, though Michigan, UCLA, Baylor, Auburn, UNC, Florida and many others would beg to differ. After all, Villanova is the only school to win the NCAA Tournament without major football since we did it in 1999 though we in the process of upgrading starting in the fall of that year.No he is right - most basketball fans support football (some maybe while holding their nose) but there were many that advocated dropping football.
Nah a lot of the basketball fans would burn the university to the ground thinking it would save the program when in reality all it does it kill it. They can't fathom that under Ollie, they just weren't a good program and they wanted to blame everything else but basketball for why the program was average. They can't see past the trees to see the forest."basketball nitwits"... @Jimdish255 and it's posters with comments like that, that creates the divide. Be better...
Most are supportive of UConn Athletics period. Didn't mean to suggest otherwise. But as a long time basketball fan I never understood the vocal minority that takes an adversarial position.No he is right - most basketball fans support football (some maybe while holding their nose) but there were many that advocated dropping football.
Ehh, I'm a hoop first fan and it didn't bother me. The football nitwits that still pine for the AAC are the ones that divide, imo."basketball nitwits"... @Jimdish255 and it's posters with comments like that, that creates the divide. Be better...
I may do a poll on this at some point in time. I suspect that there is a substantial minority who route for all UConn sports. Another group who only support one or two sports, say basketball and football or women’s basketball and men’s basketball and a third group who actively root against sports other than the one they follow, which is so weird to me. I suspect that last group is relatively small, but vocal.No he is right - most basketball fans support football (some maybe while holding their nose) but there were many that advocated dropping football.