bendm
Utterly Impossible
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2018
- Messages
- 8,706
- Reaction Score
- 31,107
it's not that black and white lol. you're assuming we are guaranteed to get multiple proven immediate impact transfers every year when we dont even know who will be in the portal. it makes perfect sense to opt for the 4* HS recruit that staff can spend a year or more scouting and developing a relationship with rather than leaving the spot open for a transfer to be named later that you have 1 month to land.Why would you rather build with unproven, potentially non-contributing freshman over proven immediate impact transfers? That make no sense.
youre also disregarding what i actually said. i meant "build" as in a majority of every class are highschool recruits as opposed to transfers. i'm fully in favor of filling in roster holes with a transfer or two every year. so yeah i stand by what i said. i'd rather try to fill the schollys we know will be open with HS recruits and only replace unexpected departures w/ transfers.
Last edited: