Yeah. Makes it easier to block/strip.A but smoother, but he's still releasing it just above chin height.
He was 3rd on the team in 3 pt% last season. His shot may not be textbook but some on this board are way too critical just because he doesn’t look pretty shooting the ball.I'd hope it's getting better. Hard to get worse. Or less conventional is probably better way to word it. Keep it up Andre.
Ugly shooting form certainly worked for him
He was 3rd on the team in 3 pt% last season. His shot may not be textbook but some on this board are way too critical just because he doesn’t look pretty shooting the ball.
For most of his 3s he was not being guarded and was wide openHe was 3rd on the team in 3 pt% last season. His shot may not be textbook but some on this board are way too critical just because he doesn’t look pretty shooting the ball.
For most of his 3s he was not being guarded and was wide open. A 6 ft guard could block his shot
So should we not count them as makes?Per minute he was also 6th on the team in attempts. It's easy to put up 36% when your closest defender is getting a massage from the trainer.
No they still count but the number of shots you take absolutely matters in the context of someone as a 3 point shooterSo should we not count them as makes?
Maybe... but right now his his limited offensive abilities may be the reason he's not in the NBA. So there's legit financial impacts to his shooting issues and limited offensive abilities in generalHe was 3rd on the team in 3 pt% last season. His shot may not be textbook but some on this board are way too critical just because he doesn’t look pretty shooting the ball.
Since he came to Storrs--His release point has gotten progressively higher. Would rather have the ball go into the hole at a reasonable rate than have a good-looking shot that doesn't go in. He is going to have more shooters surrounding him than in the previous two seasons .We don't need him to be an elite shooter.
He brings too many more valuable attributes to the table to get hung up on form of jumper. IMO--Results over form is more important.
Agree with you about the necessity to improve form for the NBA once drafted. My comments were about this year's CBB season. I would expect that the team that eventually drafts him will have confidence in their skill development guys/and his hard work to get him to where he needs to be if not resolved while at UConn.If his goal is to play in the NBA, and it should be considering his physical talents, a better shot technique will be needed. In college, he will need to play off the ball and the defense will have play off him also, for him to get his shot off. A small guard playing D in his chest, will be able to defend his shot. Now, he could go around them and finish or distribute. But in the NBA many players have all the tools.
For example, look at Tebow who won the Heisman. Unbelievably, they had to work from scratch on his footwork and throwing motion. Never worked for him and he faded from view. It's not like AJ is 6'9" (more like 6'5") and at that height he would have to be a SG or small forward which requires you to be a real offensive threat which he is not.Agree with you about the necessity to improve form for the NBA once drafted. My comments were about this year's CBB season. I would expect that the team that eventually drafts him will have confidence in their skill development guys/and his hard work to get him to where he needs to be if not resolved while at UConn.
An example would be Shonn Miller who shot 27% as the main focus at Cornell, then 37% here only spotting up and taking open looks.No they still count but the number of shots you take absolutely matters in the context of someone as a 3 point shooter
BB.. I get it.. Familiar w/Tebow as a former Bronco season ticket-holder.. AJ has work to do and I don't think anyone disagrees with that. The irony is that he brings some unique-and in some cases-- elite skills as a potential NBA player -- Shooting and shooting form is not one of them.For example, look at Tebow who won the Heisman. Unbelievably, they had to work from scratch on his footwork and throwing motion. Never worked for him and he faded from view. It's not like AJ is 6'9" (more like 6'5") and at that height he would have to be a SG or small forward which requires you to be a real offensive threat which he is not.
If his goal is to play in the NBA, and it should be considering his physical talents, a better shot technique will be needed. In college, he will need to play off the ball and the defense will have play off him also, for him to get his shot off. A small guard playing D in his chest, will be able to defend his shot. Now, he could go around them and finish or distribute. But in the NBA many players have all the tools.
Does it look better?
If Andre wins the Heisman equivalent as a college player, I think we can accept him putting off his form change until the pros.For example, look at Tebow who won the Heisman. Unbelievably, they had to work from scratch on his footwork and throwing motion. Never worked for him and he faded from view. It's not like AJ is 6'9" (more like 6'5") and at that height he would have to be a SG or small forward which requires you to be a real offensive threat which he is not.
Andrew does if he wants to be in the NBA. He needs to make way more 3-pointers at the same or higher percentage.Still slow and janky, but if it goes in 36%+ of the time, who cares?
There’s no style points.