[QUOTE="HuskyWarrior611, post: 1003667 the sense of talent Rodney is more talented than any PGs we've had in the past. He's not lacking on many skills either. I've said before that we have watched Ollie develop 3 PGs who used to be out of control bad decision makers into heady guys who seem to always make the right play. Purvis is the most talented out the bunch and I'm sure he will do the same with him and we are going to see something even better.
You're right completely whiffed on drummond. stix too.
Honestly if you think we're going to see the same Rodney that we saw at NCSU you must not have faith in Ollie's ability to develop guards and must not understand how players develop in college from their freshman to junior seasons. For comparisons sake let's compare Rodney's freshman numbers in a system that didn't fit him that had a great lead guard compared to Shabazz freshman numbers where he was maximized as much as he could be playing with Kemba.
Shabazz:
7.8 ppg
2.4 rpg
3 apg
1.6 stlpg
37% FG
33% 3FG
Rodney:
8.3 ppg
2.4 rpg
1.3 apg
.8 stlpg
44% FG
38% 3FG
Like I said I have no doubt we see a different rodney purvis this year than the one we saw at NCSU.
Now when I say talent I'm not talking about skills. Skills are shooting, passing, dribbling, etc. Guys like Stanley Robinson, Rudy Gay, Andre Drummond were tremendously talented guys. But had no skills. In the sense of talent Rodney is more talented than any PGs we've had in the past. He's not lacking on many skills either. I've said before that we have watched Ollie develop 3 PGs who used to be out of control bad decision makers into heady guys who seem to always make the right play. Purvis is the most talented out the bunch and I'm sure he will do the same with him and we are going to see something even better.
Did Shabazz win it or did Kemba win it? But I see. Then again if he was special his freshman year he probably wouldn't have left or would've been drafted.Shabazz won a National Championship, you left that out.
I have plenty of faith in Ollie and this staff's ability and I think we will indeed see a far better player than we saw 2 years ago.
My original point, if you read back, was that there was no evidence at NCSU that Purvis was anything special. I believe that was because of that staff and that system. Never said he didn't have what it takes, just that he was nothing special at NCSU.
I mean usually people equate talent to size and athleticism. That's why a Russell Westbrook is very talented compared to Chris Paul being highly skilled at this point in his career. Same way you'd say Dwight Howard is a very talented big why a guy like Pau in his prime was just considered the most skilled big in the game. Same with Tim Duncan. And I understand I'm used to it. But I just call it how I see it. I don't temper my expectations or raise them based on other people. I mean we've had guys get hyped and bust like Majok and Deng, then other guys who aren't hyped and exceed expectations like Shabazz and Kemba. Purvis on this board is more like the latter. So I expect him to exceed everyone's expectations. LolI think the problem you're having is that you're using the word "talent" as a proxy for athleticism. I don't think a lot of people see it that way.
But just generally speaking when you're talking about a kid who had a good but unspectacular freshman season, who hasn't played in a live game for more than a year, and you're putting him in the pantheon of all time UConn greats (he's "a more athletic Ben Gordon" - ), you're bound to get some push-back. Because, honestly, we do that all the freaking time around here and it works out that way basically never. And then all you've done is created a mountain of hype for the kid to be judged against.
Chill son the kid's in high schoolI appreciate the content, but the sentence structure makes it pretty difficult to read.
GO JALEN!
You could offer to edit his content. Would be a nice way to help a high school kid who does an amazing job covering Uconn recruiting.I appreciate the content, but the sentence structure makes it pretty difficult to read.
GO JALEN!
Take a look at 1:03. Bazz never showed us any of that!
Actually as someone whose job revolves around spoken and written language (and swallowing), I'll gladly give @3uconn pointers on his style. Hit me up if you're up for it, man.You could offer to edit his content. Would be a nice way to help a high school kid who does an amazing job covering Uconn recruiting.
Actually as someone whose job revolves around spoken and written language (and swallowing), I'll gladly give @3uconn pointers on his style. Hit me up if you're up for it, man.
I love how in this video it starts out with a layup, then a 10 footer, then a 14 footer, then an 18 footer with dunks and dimes to follow. I'm sure it was setup this way, but I hope and think it exemplifies his versatility.
hahahaha oh the bj innuendos you can make in my profession..... like inadequate lip closure, anterior spillage or oral contents, eliciting a gag, handling thickened liquids....
I appreciate the content, but the sentence structure makes it pretty difficult to read.
GO JALEN!
Dude doesn't really know what he's talking about. There's nothing really wrong with the sentence structure/syntax itself, it's more of a punctuation thing. We use commas and periods and stuff like that to add a kind of depth that is normally created with pauses, stress and loudness patterns, etc. in spoken language that is missing in written language. Emojis are taking over for some other suprasegmental/nonverbal stuff these days, which is of course great.Really? Don't read then. That's poor structures, yes?
When in doubt leave it out.Dude doesn't really know what he's talking about. There's nothing really wrong with the sentence structure/syntax itself, it's more of a punctuation thing. We use commas and periods and stuff like that to add a kind of depth that is normally created with pauses, stress and loudness patterns, etc. in spoken language that is missing in written language. Emojis are taking over for some other suprasegmental/nonverbal stuff these days, which is of course great.
Some work on using commas to better indicate phrase boundaries is really all 3 needs. On which, as I said, I'm happy to work with him, as opposed to just dismissing him like some of our more mature posters.