As a UCONN fan, I will always be indebted to Coach Calhoun, but I have to agree with Jacobs on this one. This is UCONN and Coach Ollie's time in the sun. It is wrong for coach Calhoun to be in the news with the BC job. If it's not true, then he should deny it in no uncertain terms, which he has not. This tells me the stories are true. Which is terrible, especially, after how BC left the Big East and how they screwed UConn's entry into the ACC. Coach ...if you want to coach again, do it anywhere but BC!!!
You say that as if was true. This entire 'story' is a construct. Jacobs knows this to be true that's why he used the following language.Typical Jacobs stuff. He seemed to enjoy the "fact" that it was BC who wasn't interested in Calhoun and not the other way around. He basically calls Calhoun an attention whore who took the spotlight off the UConn team. I don't think there is any evidence to support this. Jimmy is an all time great HOF coach. Jacobs is a mediocre writer at a dinosaur newspaper. He deserves a punch in the throat along with Mick Cronin.![]()
If those reports are both accurate — and there is no evidence that either is untrue — it also should be the end of the story, right? Calhoun, who'll be 72 in May, wants to coach BC. BC doesn't want Calhoun to coach BC. Period.
Starting to think that where there's smoke there's fire.
Guys, don't call Jeff Jacobs names. He might call you out for it on Joe Zone's high school production quality CPTV show.
dtrumpet said:This story would be dead if JC wanted it that way.
Starting to think that where there's smoke there's fire.
I don't think he'll be the next BC coach but his people probably reached out. If he wants to get back into coaching then his agents would not be doing their job if they did notYeah, and it's starting to really piss me off. I would've like a definitive statement from JC that was in no way, shape, or form interested in the BC job.
The Bill Clinton like talk is getting annoying.
That said, I'll eat my shoes if JC is the next BC coach.
Would it though? Jacobs got exactly the result he wanted here. He was just licking his chops at the smell of this one.
He's incredibly transparent.
The lack of basic understanding within our own fan base is staggering. He already said he'd never say never to listening to anyone. If he eliminates BC, then the story becomes UConn's continuing grudge for the BC traitors, ACC blackball, etc. Posing this question to JC is the equivalent of "Are you still beating your wife?" There is no good answer.JC's had numerous opportunities to say " I have no interest in the BC coaching job." That wouldn't close all the doors, just this one. Easy as that.
I don't think he'll be the next BC coach but his people probably reached out. If he wants to get back into coaching then his agents would not be doing their job if they did not
I agree with Jacobs. This is JC being JC.
I got "stalked" by this guy, many years ago, as he was writing an article about a few good volunteers trying to enforce a rule in a youth sports tourney. It came down to knowing the rules before you entered the tourney, but then a few coaches started in on gamesmanship, and made a farce of the rules for the remaining 90% of the teams that had followed them. I spent weeks screening my calls ...
He did that two years ago. I realize that you've missed most of the time between then and now because the results have been positive, despite your hopes to the contrary. You might try paying a little attention.At some point Jim Calhoun just needs to step aside and let his hand picked successor run the show.
Some people forgot the simple saying, "any press is good press". What I think Calhoun is doing for himself and the school he build. Unless he's actually a Catholic and wants to atone for supporting evolution. He's free to do as he wants.
Besides, who are any of us to tell Calhoun what the duckk to do?
If he wanted to coach again, at BC no less, then he doesn't get to hold WM hostage in naming his successor. this.
Yeah, because that worked out so badly.If he wanted to coach again, at BC no less, then he doesn't get to hold WM hostage in naming his successor. this.
Calhoun could have shut it down by saying, no I'm not interested in coaching and have not pursued any jobs. Instead it's this nebulous,I haven't contacted BC or if I felt this good 2 years ago I never would have retired.What Jacobs misses is that this is the time of year where coaching vacancies generally get filled. The fact that he thinks Calhoun is consciously trying to deflect attention away from the current team just demonstrates how far removed from reality Jacobs is. Do I hate the fact that this has become a story with the biggest game of Ollie's tenure just hours away? Yeah, but if JC wants to get back into coaching, he has to put out feelers now.
Cheddie said:I have to weigh in on Jacob's side. As huskiesnyc wrote, JC could have emphatically shut this down. He clearly left the door open, and allowed the writers in. Read the quotes tweeted by Duffy yesterday. Duffy Calhoun: "Someone is speculating, and like I said, I would never say never, and from that it's grown it's own life a little bit." Duffy: Calhoun said he "can't speculate" if he'd show interest should B.C. reach out to him. Duffy: Calhoun (cont): "I haven't thought about it..well I shouldn't say that, that would be untrue. I haven't done anything about it." Duffy: Calhoun (cont): You could say, 'well, say you're never going to coach again.' I'm not going to say that."