A-10 might be a step up from the little League that they're in now.Be careful what you wish for Hartford haters. UConn without Hartford is the A-10.
A-10 might be a step up from the little League that they're in now.Be careful what you wish for Hartford haters. UConn without Hartford is the A-10.
Outside of the big 4 cities in the northeast (Boston, NYC, Philly, DC), UConn has the 4th largest arena (19K) in the region. Not surprisingly, the 3 larger arenas (Buffalo, Newark, and Baltimore) all have pro (NHL tenants) and are also 2x to 4x Hartford's population. The other midsize cities in the region have arenas with a capacity between 8K and 14K. Assuming that Hartford is not getting an NHL team in the foreseeable future, Thus, the AHL is what Hartford has. The AHL has and average attendance (2013) of about 6K per game (Hartford averages 5K currently) with a high of 8K (Hershey). Thus, Hartford should look for a viable replacement for the XL in the 8K to 10K range. The only reason for a new arena in Hartford to be larger is to host UConn men's basketball games. Does it make sense for Hartford (and the State) to build an arena that will only hit its max capacity 8 to 10 times a year while, at the same time, taking away a superior environment for college basketball in person and on TV ($$) as college students provide better support game time than a bunch of politicians? Separate the two issues. Build a new XL that will meet Hartford's needs reasonably that can also be used as a second home for UCconn when the students are on break and get a 12K to 14K arena in Storrs that UConn and it's fan deserve.
That's rediculous. An 8-10k seat arena? This is a venue that serves the whole Hartford/Springfield market. What would an 8k seat arena do for the region? AHL hockey? That's about it. There are 3 small arenas within reasonable distance and the extra seats in the middle of our market (30th largest in the US) actually would put the venue shoulders above the competition. Also I don't care that you "know the NHL isn't coming back" but the good thing about that is what you think doesn't matter.Outside of the big 4 cities in the northeast (Boston, NYC, Philly, DC), UConn has the 4th largest arena (19K) in the region. Not surprisingly, the 3 larger arenas (Buffalo, Newark, and Baltimore) all have pro (NHL tenants) and are also 2x to 4x Hartford's population. The other midsize cities in the region have arenas with a capacity between 8K and 14K. Assuming that Hartford is not getting an NHL team in the foreseeable future, Thus, the AHL is what Hartford has. The AHL has and average attendance (2013) of about 6K per game (Hartford averages 5K currently) with a high of 8K (Hershey). Thus, Hartford should look for a viable replacement for the XL in the 8K to 10K range. The only reason for a new arena in Hartford to be larger is to host UConn men's basketball games. Does it make sense for Hartford (and the State) to build an arena that will only hit its max capacity 8 to 10 times a year while, at the same time, taking away a superior environment for college basketball in person and on TV ($$) as college students provide better support game time than a bunch of politicians? Separate the two issues. Build a new XL that will meet Hartford's needs reasonably that can also be used as a second home for UCconn when the students are on break and get a 12K to 14K arena in Storrs that UConn and it's fan deserve.
I think we should relocate UCONN out of state, somewhere where land is cheaper and we might grab some incentives from a new state!
BS. Hartford makes games accessible to taxpayers on the shoreline from New Haven west. Not to mention, playing in hartford means legislators get to walk to the games after work. And if you don't think that matters you've never worked at the state capital.
The "makes games accessible to taxpayers" argument is so soft and weak its sad. Oh, but legislators get to walk over! Where is my fainting couch!
Do you guys have any idea how far fans travel for games at most state schools? It's a hell of a lot longer than Westport to Storrs- even with the terrifyingly bad traffic.
The "makes games accessible to taxpayers" argument is so soft and weak its sad. Oh, but legislators get to walk over! Where is my fainting couch!
Do you guys have any idea how far fans travel for games at most state schools? It's a hell of a lot longer than Westport to Storrs- even with the terrifyingly bad traffic.
businesslawyer said:I don't disagree with that but what damn difference does it makle how far someone who lives in bumf@@k, Arkansas, or Nebrask, or Alabama, is willing to drive to see the State U play. It only matters what people in CT are willing to do.
And I've worked two sessions in the CT General Assembly. I have seen the legislators booze up in the building and walk to the Civic Center. You can tell me it should be irrelevant all you want. It isn't.\
They're building a new hockey arena on campus. Football attendance has been a disaster, so I'm not sure why we would want basketball to emulate that model.Wait, don't we play our football games and hockey games off campus? What's the problem with basketball at a new arena in Hartford. I think the Uconn students somehow make the trip to East Hartford but find it too difficult or expensive to go to Hartford. Talk about XL, Gampel is at least 10 yrs to old.
businesslawyer said:I don't disagree with that but what damn difference does it makle how far someone who lives in bumf@@k, Arkansas, or Nebrask, or Alabama, is willing to drive to see the State U play. It only matters what people in CT are willing to do. And I've worked two sessions in the CT General Assembly. I have seen the legislators booze up in the building and walk to the Civic Center. You can tell me it should be irrelevant all you want. It isn't.\
They're building a new hockey arena on campus. Football attendance has been a disaster, so I'm not sure why we would want basketball to emulate that model.
Based strictly on revenue, playing in front of more and higher priced seats lends to playing more games in Hartford. The political benefit of supporting the City also factors in here.
But I see a different model going forward. The NHL games were an event, the AHL games decidedly, no. It helps the bars because 2000 people downtown is still 2000 people downtown, so the State will want them.
When UConn sold 12k seats at the old CC regardless of the opponent. That was better than selling 8k at Gampel and helped build the statewide following.
Today, UConn has different goals and the $ benefit to playing in Hartford just isn't what it used to be. What UConn needs now is a rabid fanbase, that comes from demand for tickets and high market visibility and winning. The visibility you get from TV these days. What they need is excitement.
Also, you now have FB to carry the brand in the Hartford area plus a little bit of Hockey. Schedule big games over winter break in Hartford if you can. That will serve both masters. Playing Cincinnati or Temple in Hartford does nothing for UConn.
UC990411 said:Really? Click this link. http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=400497020
The atmosphere at that game rivaled anything that has gone on in gampel the last 5 years.
Do these events draw more than 10k? I can't see anyone wanting to watch these from the upper seats.Not sure exactly what the demand is in Hartford but there are other uses besides UConn basketball that would draw more than 8,000-10,000 people. Just looking at the XL Center calendar I see lots of concerts, Disney on Ice, WWE, Monster Jam (how many people in CT go to this?), Harlem Globetrotters, obviously the AAC Tournament (which you can't count on every year), Marvel: Universe Live (?), and P&G Gymnastics Championships. Other uses could be UFC, circus, etc. So I think a Hartford arena would draw more than 10,000 people more than 10 times a year. Are there enough dates to make it worth putting more seats in? I can't answer that question.
The reason attendance has declined is pricing policy. I had a friend who had to give up his season tickets when he was priced out.I'd hope that someone has done market research on this to determine the optimal price point. The debacle of the 90s pricing and treatment of longstanding fans should never happen again. I also hope that some thought has gone into maximizing the broadcast value of the games. Having students courtside helps that, in my opinion, although ZLS may know if it really matters.
Was at both and yes.Florida game at Gampel last year?