Jacobs says it!

[Hoophound]

Not sure that was the perspective he was portraying in the article but I agree with you on the surface, it's a better pond for us. What pond is UConn in? Did you see the Carleton score?

I think he is making a great case for UConn going back to the Big East being good for the conference. It is kind of oddly written. The title doesn't really jive with the last third of the article. Usually, the conclusion makes your opinion clear. He justifies his opinion, or the article title anyway, early and wraps it up by rattling off five reasons UConn coming back would be good for the conference.

 

[Husky1964]

We ALLOW FriarJ to post constantly on our board usually snarky when his board would ban us if we posted the same. I speak from experience having been banned more than once in Friar land. Also Syracuse. Why do we allow Snarky on our board?

 

[FriarJ]

We ALLOW FriarJ to post constantly on our board usually snarky when his board would ban us if we posted the same. I speak from experience having been banned more than once in Friar land. Also Syracuse. Why do we allow Snarky on our board?

You allow me in all your divinity. To you Husky1964 I will forever be grateful.

 

[upstater]

Huh? care to explain why me posting in this thread portrays a massive inferiority complex? You of all people who has never been wrong and will run a thread into the ground to prove it should not be commenting honestly, but go ahead and give me the reasons you see an inferiority complex.

Yes, I can explain. You post. Then reply, whatever when someone responds. Like you're only here to troll.