He looked like a little boy against Mercer.Parker was a man among boys. Inside, outside game mixed with strength. He will be just fine in the NBA.
That's the fallacy of the argument. Everyone should go early folks always pick the highest possible projection and accept that as fact. I think a lot better indication of where someone WOULD have been drafted might be where they DID get drafted. Sullinger slid and was picked too low, but if you read his story that's happened to him at every level. He's a slightly overweight, earth bound kid who knows how to play.
I acknowledge there are some examples of kids who came out early and cashed in on irrational hype. Tryus Thomas comes to mind or Marvin Williams (UNC). But an occasional skyrocketing guy doesn't mean that every guy rumored to be a high pick would have stayed there, every single year there are guys who fall in the draft AND if a guy opts out of the draft it is very likely that he heard something behind the scenes that questioned him or made slipping a real possibility.
Kentucky's Will Young (the guy who dunked on Amida) .
Of course there are sophomores every draft... That's not the point. My original post clearly clearly said "stud" freshman. None of the 3 guys you named were stud freshman projected to even go the 1st round. aceboon's subsequent post listing Smart, Jones, Barnes, and Sullinger (projected top 5 to top 10 guys) pretty much hit the nail on the head so I'll leave it at that.Nick Stuaskas, TJ Warren, Rodney Hood?!!!
There are sophomores in every draft.
No one said top 5, BU said "I can't recall the last time one of these stud freshman returned to school and actually increased their stock."Sullinger slid mainly because of the issues with his back, besides all the other mumbo jumbo the main point is you countered BUHusky's post by naming 3 guys who weren't even 1st round picks after their freshman years, let alone lottery picks, who returned for their sophomore years. There seems to be a disconnect with you that pops up quite often in posts like these that renders debate useless.
Harrison BarnesOf course there are sophomores every draft... That's not the point. My original post clearly clearly said "stud" freshman. None of the 3 guys you named were stud freshman projected to even go the 1st round. aceboon's subsequent post listing Smart, Jones, Barnes, and Sullinger (projected top 5 to top 10 guys) pretty much hit the nail on the head so I'll leave it at that.
I mostly agree on Randle, but not 100% confident due to his length and lack of explosiveness. He will be a good player for certain, but I think his range is wide (we agree Parker's is more narrow and better). Randle could be Zach Randolph+ explosiveness or Rodney Rogers (this is prob too low, but let's see what Randle's actual height is).
What do you see in Randle to even sniff # 1?I think he could go #1 overall. I think Wiggins, Embid have huge variances in what kind of NBA players they'll be. Parker will very likely be an all-star or cusp all-star. I'd be picking between him and Randle if I had #1 leaning towards Jabari.
Honestly nothing (I watched Randle in NCAA only, 3-4 games), just hedging off declaring Jabari a consensus #1. I've only seen 2 full games from Wiggins and one from Embid. Parker probably 5 games so just not enough of anyone to feel really strong about order.What do you see in Randle to even sniff # 1?
I can't, for the life of me, figure out why Sports Illustrated feels compelled to put an essay by the kid explaining his decision on the front of their web page.
I think you meant James Young. Man, was that an impressive dunk though. I was watching in Gampel and the whole place fell completely silent in awe.
Glad to see he's leaving, though.
Randle got all the hype, but Young was their best player overall
Randle got all the hype, but Young was their best player overall
Maybe he really was torn. Caron Butler was. Rudy Gay was. Just because it makes sense to go pro doesn't mean it's easy.When I read that Parker was "torn" a couple days ago I was beginning to wonder if K would hoodwink him into coming back, Thankfully he made the right choice for himself.
Maybe he really was torn. Caron Butler was. Rudy Gay was. Just because it makes sense to go pro doesn't mean it's easy.
Exhibit A Jared Sullinger...Smart decision by him. I can't recall the last time one of these stud freshman returned to school and actually increased their stock. If anything it hurt their stock to varying degrees.
Why did he go to Dook in the first place? K isn't great at developing talent. Would love to see him on a structured NBA team though (not a huge celtics or Knicks fan so I just appreciate great players and great basketball). If he goes to a team like the Kings or Cavs, his career will be ruined
Cal's players are good in the leagueHe should have gone to Kentucky where Cal is sooooo good at developing talented one-and-done's ………..
If you appreciate great players and great basketball you should have been rooting for him to transfer to UConn for a couple more years, not go to the NBA…………
Need a coffee…….
First I think there are too many ill-conceived websites (nbadraft.net primary example) and espn idiots like Chad Ford that do mock drafts that can encourage kids to come out before they are ready (a zillion examples basketball skill-wise) and that is why I beat the drum hard about stay in school. Its obviously an opinion and its not personal if I argue against a giant wave of folks saying strike while the iron is hot.Exhibit A Jared Sullinger...
Why did he go to Dook in the first place? K isn't great at developing talent. Would love to see him on a structured NBA team though (not a huge celtics or Knicks fan so I just appreciate great players and great basketball). If he goes to a team like the Kings or Cavs, his career will be ruined