He's certainly struggling with his ball handling as is Jeremy but I think the rebounds were key. This years guards including JL are not rebounding like last year. It was good too see them go after the ballSaw the boards - most of them were just fortuitous position after the ball hit the court already, although credit where credit is due. Rebounding isn't what we need out of him. It's just the little things with the kid - he makes so many head scratching moves in a game, from the little things like overdribbling, to missing a layup to throwing the ball behind Lamb in transition, to getting stuck in double teams. He just doesn't do anything crisp, it's like he's in a physical fog.
no kidding Boatright is a stud and is flat out a great player who elevates everyones game. Napier is a limited player and is playing at his maximum level.
Agree with this. Also, for a few games now we've heard announcers saying "too much thought", etc., and many times we saw hesitant play and shooting. I'd like to see them just play for a change. Commit to defense, and stopping the other guys, and the offense will start flowing again.You're a limitedposter too. Ryan was special at times and also had his share of real stupid passes....too many!! You can't dismiss that fact just because of your infatuation.....I like them both and today there was passion, from everyone. Fact is though this was a Hall team who couldn't hot the side of a barn from 10 ft away and had no Herb Pope. I'll take the win but if they're tha sloppy with the ball against Lousiville and Cuse coming up they lose them both by a combined 50!
I have an infatuation with players that are special and are key for us winning. What I still don't understand why you guys have such high expectations for Napier and keep trying to convince yourselves and me that he is a big part of our success. He is not, the key to our success is Boatright first and foremost, then comes Drummond and Lamb, after that comes Alex and Roscoe. These are the guys who will win us a title. Roscoe and Drummond's intensity especially on defense and rebounding was the main factor besides Boat why we played so well today. If we play like we played today we should beat Lousiville. You are right that we were fortunate to play a reeling Hall team without their best big men, but I don't think it would have mattered in the final outcome.
Most of us have a memory to remember to separate, but related things:
1. He was the PG most of the time when we had Kemba Walker and was a key reason to our championship last year (read: without Napier, no title)
2. Kemba Walker had similar struggles as a Sophomore as Napier is now, and many people are/were saying the same things about him as you are about Napier.
Yeah short memories by people tzz so well-stated. And no matter who we were playin the first 12-13 games he was pretty damn good and needs to find that again. The 2 kids together could be formidable if they play off each others strengths no doubt. I see people saying Bazz sucks and is awful and it makes me laugh my a** off......yeah sure he is!!!! Kemba was really bad as a soph but found himself in time to make a great 2nd half run....should be interesting to see if Bazz can do the same..........I know one thing we need him to!! 3 TO's for Bazz and 4 for Ryan - one thing is for sure those numbers cannot happen against good teams.
I hear this excuse all the time how Kemba had a bad sophomore year similar to how Napier is playing. This is frankly is not very accurate. Kemba was very good but the problem was he wasn't the main guy and main player for that team. There was Stanley and Dyson and Gavin and other talented players who wouldn't allow Kemba to be the undisputed leader of that team and had to defer to them and take a backseat. Kemba unlike Napier wasn't made a captain of that team and wasn't declared the leader of the team because if he was he would have done some special things even with that team.
Shabazz's stats (35.8 mpg): 13.6 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 5.9 apg (/3.0 tpg), 1.7 spg, 39.7% FG, 35.5% 3-point, 74.2% FT
Kemba's sophomore stats (35.3 mpg): 14.6 ppg, 4.3 rpg, 5.1 apg (/2.9 tpg), 2.1 spg, 40.3% FG, 33.9% 3-point, 76.7% FT
Shabazz will never be as good as Kemba, but he's closer as a sophomore than your Replicant wants to give him credit for. He also has the ability to be more than just a role player as an upperclassman.
Shabazz's stats (35.8 mpg): 13.6 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 5.9 apg (/3.0 tpg), 1.7 spg, 39.7% FG, 35.5% 3-point, 74.2% FT
Kemba's sophomore stats (35.3 mpg): 14.6 ppg, 4.3 rpg, 5.1 apg (/2.9 tpg), 2.1 spg, 40.3% FG, 33.9% 3-point, 76.7% FT
Shabazz will never be as good as Kemba, but he's closer as a sophomore than your Replicant wants to give him credit for. He also has the ability to be more than just a role player as an upperclassman.
Shabazz's stats (35.8 mpg): 13.6 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 5.9 apg (/3.0 tpg), 1.7 spg, 39.7% FG, 35.5% 3-point, 74.2% FT
Kemba's sophomore stats (35.3 mpg): 14.6 ppg, 4.3 rpg, 5.1 apg (/2.9 tpg), 2.1 spg, 40.3% FG, 33.9% 3-point, 76.7% FT
Shabazz will never be as good as Kemba, but he's closer as a sophomore than your Replicant wants to give him credit for. He also has the ability to be more than just a role player as an upperclassman.
Agree with this. Also, for a few games now we've heard announcers saying "too much thought", etc., and many times we saw hesitant play and shooting. I'd like to see them just play for a change. Commit to defense, and stopping the other guys, and the offense will start flowing again.
no kidding Boatright is a stud and is flat out a great player who elevates everyones game. Napier is a limited player and is playing at his maximum level.