I remember how disappointed I felt watching him frosh year.Here's the thing about Hawkins. He made a remarkable jump forward in 22-23 from 21-22, seems to be making another large jump from 22-23 to this year, and there is little reason to think he's going to level off any time soon.
I know it won't happen, but the Boneyard needs to remember, when judging the future of other freshmen, how little impact Hawk had on the team his freshman season.
He couldn't dribble. Hilarious to look back on nowI remember how disappointed I felt watching him frosh year.
He did look great until the Auburn disaster...and then he started playing well and Georgetown concussion ended his season and lowered the team's ceiling. They don't lose to NMSU with a healthy Hawk.Here's the thing about Hawkins. He made a remarkable jump forward in 22-23 from 21-22, seems to be making another large jump from 22-23 to this year, and there is little reason to think he's going to level off any time soon.
I know it won't happen, but the Boneyard needs to remember, when judging the future of other freshmen, how little impact Hawk had on the team his freshman season.
I know it won't happen, but the Boneyard needs to remember, when judging the future of other freshmen, how little impact Hawk had on the team his freshman season.
Donnie Marshall, Kevin Ollie, Andre Jackson, Nels Giffey and a host of players in between would beg to differ.It was pretty obvious how much potential he had after freshman season though. I certainly wasn't disappointed. There's a reason why he was on mock draft boards and pre-season lists despite only averaging 7ppg as a freshman--it was clearly he was bursting with talent.
I see that same potential with Solo. He isn't there yet, but the pieces are apparent. Not to the same extent as Hawkins, but it's there.
The concern will be if Ross and/or Stewart don't show those pieces by the end of the season. Right now, they're basically just on the court existing. It's rare that a kid goes from 9th/10th man to a serious, starting caliber player.
I was in preschool during Marshall and Ollie's freshman year so don't remember that, but Giffey started 10 games and got major run early in the year and in the championship game, while Jackson was a 6th/7th man and played 16 mpg.Donnie Marshall, Kevin Ollie, Andre Jackson, Nels Giffey and a host of players in between would beg to differ.
Donnie Marshall, Kevin Ollie, Andre Jackson, Nels Giffey and a host of players in between would beg to differ.
Klay Thompson reincarnated. But more athletic. Crazy to think.He's going to be a 25PPG scorer either next year or the season after that. Been saying it all along that he has a $200M jump shot
Ball just has "it". He gets to the rim sometimes and can't finish but once he gets used to running into 6'10 dudes in the paint instead of hs kids he'll be fine. He cuts well, his shot looks decent (when he's not rushing his feet and actually gets set) and he defends very well.It was pretty obvious how much potential he had after freshman season though. I certainly wasn't disappointed. There's a reason why he was on mock draft boards and pre-season lists despite only averaging 7ppg as a freshman--it was clearly he was bursting with talent.
I see that same potential with Solo. He isn't there yet, but the pieces are apparent. Not to the same extent as Hawkins, but it's there.
The concern will be if Ross and/or Stewart don't show those pieces by the end of the season. Right now, they're basically just on the court existing. It's rare that a kid goes from 9th/10th man to a serious, starting caliber player.
I agree with this. His ability to drill it with a hand in his face, in addition to the speed of release, makes him truly unique. I can't believe how many open threes he's missed though. If he'd nailed the 6-7 wide open looks he's had, the national hype train would be something fierce.He's going to be a 25PPG scorer either next year or the season after that. Been saying it all along that he has a $200M jump shot
I don't know much about Donnie or Ollie--I was very young--but I do know that Andre and Niels don't apply here. Niels started a bunch of games and was one of the best 6th-men in the country by tourney time. Andre started games and averaged 16 mpg. He was another clearly high potential player.
Also, can we consider you named FOUR players--two of whom don't even apply--out of the past, what, 30 years of basketball? How many deep bench players have we had--30 40? 50? You're actually kind of proving my point.
Ball just has "it". He gets to the rim sometimes and can't finish but once he gets used to running into 6'10 dudes in the paint instead of hs kids he'll be fine. He cuts well, his shot looks decent (when he's not rushing his feet and actually gets set) and he defends very well.
Agree completely on Ross and Stewart. We need one of them to step up and be able to contribute or the bench depth is not going to be enough. Diarra is a good leader and a pretty good defender but his lack of offense lowers the ceiling.
It was pretty obvious how much potential he had after freshman season though. I certainly wasn't disappointed. There's a reason why he was on mock draft boards and pre-season lists despite only averaging 7ppg as a freshman--it was clearly he was bursting with talent.
I see that same potential with Solo. He isn't there yet, but the pieces are apparent. Not to the same extent as Hawkins, but it's there.
The concern will be if Ross and/or Stewart don't show those pieces by the end of the season. Right now, they're basically just on the court existing. It's rare that a kid goes from 9th/10th man to a serious, starting caliber player.